Search Results

1. [2023] NZEnvC 111 Schmuck v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 12 MB]

   ...two Hearing Commissioners in the first matter appealed, that they found the complexities raised by parties and the sheer volume of materials, equally daunting. We have sympathy for them. [11] Many substantial statements of evidence have been filed, and clearly that was the pattern in the two proceedings before Hearing Commissioners. [12] It has not been possible to prioritise resolution of these appeals in the circumstances of such egregious abuse of resource management processe...

2. Kaupapa Maori Resolution Pathways [pdf, 792 KB]

   Kaupapa Māori Resolution Pathways Research Report August 2022 Awa Associates CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................... 3 GLOSSARY ............................................................................................ 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................... 7 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................

3. Baker v Paora - Te Tii Waitangi B3 (2015) 113 Taitokerau MB 31 (113 TTK 31) [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...Taitokerau MB 116 (19 TTK 116). 2 81 Taitokerau MB 29 (81 TTK 29). 113 Taitokerau MB 34 beneficiaries. Mr Coutts was to file a further revised trust order by 5 February 2015. A further draft (version 13) trust order was subsequently filed and is the subject of this decision. [5] On 17 September 2014, Ms Paora filed her application for enforcement of obligations of the Trust. 3 The application, which was supported by material filed by Hinewhare Harawira, raised conc...

4. Smitheram v Hanns [2010] NZWHT Wellington 24 [pdf, 483 KB]

   ...had been properly specified or manufactured to meet the wind zones and fire rating specified for the units or the glazing compliance with the requirements of the Building Code for window performance. [28] The Wellington City Council property files in the assessor‟s report referred to a certificate from Wellington Glass and Mirror Ltd stating the glazing complies with NZDS 4223. NZS 4223 is the Glazing Standard. This is a different standard to NZS4232 which is the standard fo...

5. Directory of Official Information A-C [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   Directory of Official Information Listings A-C About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz

6. [2012] NZEmpC 71 Premier Events Group Ltd and Ors v Beatttie and Ors [pdf, 67 KB]

   ...nature of a set-off, which is in the form of an unjustified disadvantage personal grievance. I decline that application to strike out Mr Regan’s grievance. It was raised by the service on BAPL of Mr Regan’s grievance proceedings which were filed in the Employment Relations Authority. The date of its raising, so far as that can be best estimated, was 25 June 2010. The 90 day period provided for in s 114 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act) is calculated by counting ba...

7. Jace Investments Limited and Anor v CAC304 & Anor [2015] NZREADT 86 [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...COUNSEL Mr G Brittain for the appellants Ms K Lawson-Bradshaw for the Authority Ms H R Smith and Mr S Caradus for the second respondent DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL The Present Applications for Costs [1] On 23 September 2015 Mr Brittain as counsel filed a memorandum for Maketu Estates Ltd seeking costs against the Authority and/ or the licensee broadly on the basis that these proceedings have been delayed due to the alleged inability of the Authority to obtain instructions from its...

8. Smith - Taheke 2 (2014) 84 Taitokerau 166 (84 TTK 166) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...proper consent from the trustees of the Mihi Moria Maude Smith Whānau Trust, I considered that the support of the two major owners in the land was sufficient to justify an occupation order. However, I adjourned the application for Mr Smith to file a revised sketch plan of the proposed occupation site and written consents from the said trust. [6] Mr Smith has now addressed the matters I raised with him on 17 March 2014. Furthermore, following my further direction of 17 April 2014,...

9. Williams – Harataunga West 2B2B2B2 (2014) 74 Waikato Maniapoto MB 6 (74 WMN 6) [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...unnecessarily. Given that the appeal grounds relate only to the appointment of one of the trustees, a concern may be the impact any appeal would have on the normal operations of the Trust. [15] In any case, there have not been any submissions filed on this point even though parties were provided with that opportunity. [16] Weighing all matters I consider that the interests of justice would be best served by granting leave to appeal against my provisional determination....

10. Selwyn v Hobson (2011) 18 Taitokerau MB 1 (18 TTK 1) [pdf, 112 KB]

    ...this with the surveyor but that did not happen. On my reading of the District Plan a 2230m² area should be sufficient. Accordingly, I intend to make the partition order on the basis of an area of 2230m². As yet, only a contour plan has been filed. Henry Junior and Angela will need to file a sketch plan. [10] Second, and of greater significance, at present Lot 4 does not have legal access to Paparore Road. Access is via Lot 2 DP 27209 (“Lot 2”) which is General land owned by...