Search Results

1. Wyatt v CAC 10040 & Barefoot & Thompson [2012] NZREADT 22 [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...its handling of a 13 April 2007 sale of rural land owned by the appellant’s family trust. [2] In dismissing the appellant’s appeal on 23 February 2012, we reserved leave to apply with regard to costs. On 22 March 2012 the second respondent filed 2 submissions seeking costs. The appellant filed response submissions on 29 March 2012, and first respondent on 11 April 2012. [3] Counsel for the second respondent seek the following orders, namely: [a] Scale costs pl...

2. Kamhara v CAC10046 & Jhagroo [2012] NZREADT 9 [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...that they would object if Mr Jhagroo ever applied for a licence again. 3 [7] Mr Jhagroo did in fact come back to New Zealand and is now working for Zest Realty as a salesperson. The REINZ investigation was never concluded and the file, the Tribunal understands, remains with the REINZ. It has not been passed to the Real Estate Agents Authority during the course of this investigation. Committee Decision [8] In its decision the Complaints Assessment Committee found tha...

3. Warminister v Flint and Radnorshire LCRO 202 / 2009 (18 February 2010) [pdf, 61 KB]

   ...stated he has no intention of producing the omitted documents to anybody until it is established that the absence of the documents is fraudulent. At the hearing it appeared that Mr Warminister was alleging Mr Flint had removed documents from his file, however, on reading the complaint it is clear that the allegation is that Mr Flint did not give certain documents to the Complaints Committee when answering the first complaint. [20] There is no professional breach in this. While the C...

4. Salisbury v Hexham LCRO 25 / 2009 (12 May 2009) [pdf, 54 KB]

   ...these reasons the Committee concluded that no further action was necessary and dismissed the complaint. Mr Salisbury made an application for review to this office on 12 March 2009. [2] This review was conducted on the basis of the application, the file of the Standards Committee which was made available to me and the submissions of the parties. The parties have consented to this matter being considered without a formal hearing and therefore in accordance with s 206(2) of the Lawyers...

5. 2017 NZSSAA 041 (21 July 2017) [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...[1] XXXX appeals the decision of the Chief Executive not to grant her an increase in her accommodation supplement of $40 from 30 April 2016. This decision was upheld by a Benefits Review Committee on 24 August 2016. [2] Since her appeal was filed Ms XXXX’s rent has increased again on 20 February 2017 to $430 per week. This last rent increase occurred after Ms XXXX was given notice to vacate the home she had lived in for 24 years. [3] When she had to move Ms XXXX was unable to...

6. GT v TJ LCRO 10 / 2011 (20 January 2012) [pdf, 57 KB]

   ...The Practitioner‟s involvement with any employment matters was minor and peripheral, although it appears that he was present when the Applicant was requested to hand over his keys etc when his employment was terminated. [6] The Applicant filed complaints against several lawyers from the Practitioner‟s firm, including the Practitioner. He argued that he was a client of the Practitioner‟s firm and that the Practitioner ought not to have acted against him in the employment mat...

7. [2018] NZEnvC 044 Whangarei District Council v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...RPS modified to remove the struck through words above. [21] Costs are not usually an issue in appeals on plans and policy statements. I leave the question open in the current case however. If any application for costs is to be made it should be filed and served within 15 working days of the date of this decision. Any reply thereto should be filed within 10 further working days. LJ Newhook Principal Environment Judge

8. Murray - Ohawini B1 (2020) 217 Taitokerau MB 99 (217 TTK 99) [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...Land Court COVID-19 level 2 protocol issued by His Honour Chief Judge Isaac dated 13 May 2020. [6] In line with the directions of Court, Georgina Murray was contacted to ascertain whether or not she had any further evidence or submissions to be filed. She informed the Court that no further evidence was to be filed. 217 Taitokerau MB 101 Ngā kōrero a te kaitono – Applicant’s submissions [7] The applicant seeks to occupy an area of 2540m2, for the benefit of the descendan...

9. TTOT - Application for Review of Decision of Local Registration Authority [pdf, 352 KB]

   ...to the Tribunal. • You can also print and fill in this form by hand. Use a black pen or blue pen, and print clearly IN CAPITALS. • Answer every question on the form unless the instructions tell you otherwise Payment information The fee for filing an application is $600. To confirm accepted payment methods and instructions on how to pay the fee, visit our website: https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/trans-tasman- occupations/apply/ If you need further assistance, then please...

10. Evans - Tokata A14 (2005) 82 Tauranga MB 151 (82 T 151) [pdf, 327 KB]

    Minute Book: 82 T 151 In the Maori Land Court of New Zealand Waikato Maniapoto District DECISION: File: A20040005100 IN THE MA TIER of an application by Hod Matua Evans under section 164 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 in relation to Tokata A 14 and Others (Aggregated) Block Hori Matua Evans is an owner in Tokata 14 and Other (Aggregated) Block. The block comprises 239.9631 hectares. The total number of shares in the block is 221000 shares. The applicant holds 54236.7016...