TB v KP LCRO 174/2016 [pdf, 167 KB]
...that Mr KP had failed to respond to Mr TB’s telephone calls or other inquiries. (b) Noted that whilst the letter dated 1 April 2016 was “assertive, it was not discourteous or intended to be offensive”.2 Application for review [14] Mr TB filed an application for review on 28 July 2016. He sought reconsideration of his complaint in terms that: (a) The High Court had since held that the caveat must lapse.3 (b) The Committee had failed adequately to address his complaint abou...