Search Results

1. [2014] NZEmpC 92 H v A Limited [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...matters under investigation. These orders were sought on the basis that if his name was published it would likely have an adverse effect on his family, although the details of the plaintiff’s concerns and the nature and extent of the material filed in support of the application were not referred to by the Authority in its determination. What were sought, therefore, were interim rather than final orders. [3] On 13 December 2013 the Authority made an interim non-publication order...

2. Hall v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 6 [pdf, 228 KB]

   ...Council disputes liability to pay the DBH fee for obtaining the WHRS Assessors report in reliance on Holland as Trustees of the Harbourview Trust v 13 Auckland City Council3. The fee declined in Holland was not the DBH fee but the Tribunal filing fee. Mr Binnie has claimed the sum of $204.45 being half the cost of the Tribunal filing fee and this sum is not been awarded as I accept that it is a cost of the proceedings. However I do not accept that fee paid to DBH for the...

3. Mane-Waihou A8C1B1 (2018) 169 Taitokerau MB 108 (169 TTK 108) [pdf, 602 KB]

   ...Road.8 This would appear to have been a largely uncontested application. The boundaries of the occupation order are relevant to Barney’s current application for partition. Current applications [12] Since 2005, several applications have been filed that concern the homestead, the land interests gifted to Lawrence and Barney, and other land interests that remain in Lucy’s name. Most of the outstanding applications have been the subject of hearings before other Judges. They we...

4. Abraham v Auckland City Council [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...[1] The Claimants lodged a claim under the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 (“the Act”) in relation to the dwelling at 1/4 Fitzroy Street, Ponsonby, Auckland. The claim was deemed to be eligible under the Act. The Claimants filed their Notice of Adjudication under s 26 of the Act with the Weathertight Homes Resolution Service (“WHRS”) in March 2006. [2] Initially there were three respondents, but later the Third Respondent was struck out and the Fourth and F...

5. Algie & Ors v ACC [2013] NZACA 1 [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...class or representative action under the aegis of the named appellant and 20 other appellants in respect of retrospective claims for backdated attendant care payments under the 1972 and 1982 Acts. [2] At the Authority’s direction, Mr Miller filed three Bundles of Documents to identify each appellant’s date of accident, their age at the date of accident, their injuries and the rehabilitation and compensation each has received, plus applications and decision letters and review decis...

6. [2014] NZEmpC 92 H v A Ltd [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...matters under investigation. These orders were sought on the basis that if his name was published it would likely have an adverse effect on his family, although the details of the plaintiff’s concerns and the nature and extent of the material filed in support of the application were not referred to by the Authority in its determination. What were sought, therefore, were interim rather than final orders. [3] On 13 December 2013 the Authority made an interim non-publication order...

7. LCRO 275/2016 KN v YL (4 March 2019) [pdf, 277 KB]

   ...She had raised concerns with the partners of DAB regarding Mr KN’s conduct. Those concerns had prompted DAB to terminate Mr KN’s employment. [25] Armed with both comprehensive exposition of, and comprehensive response to, the complaint filed, the Committee observed that there was no scope in New Zealand for multi-disciplinary practices. The Committee noted the prohibition on income sharing between lawyers and non-lawyers in relation to the provision of legal services and stat...

8. Chaudhary v CAC 414 [2019] NZREADT 24 (7 June 2019) [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...the commission by 50 percent. She could not remember if this was after he sold the house, or before, as it was so long ago. [12] Mr Gooch telephoned Mr Chaudhary on 30 January 2017 and advised him of Mr Rajan’s complaint. Mr Gooch made a file note of this conversation, as follows: I ring 027 212 6426 and speak to Akhil Chaudhary about complaint made against him by Mani Rajan. Chaudhary states he is a good friend of Rajan and they had tea together last week. He admits he agr...

9. Director of Proceedings v McMillan [2020] NZHRRT 19 [pdf, 411 KB]

   ...Member REPRESENTATION: Ms K Eckersley, Director of Proceedings Ms C Humphrey for defendant DATE OF DECISION: 28 May 2020 (REDACTED) DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 [1] These proceedings under s 50 of the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 were filed on 4 February 2020. 1 [This decision is to be cited as: Director of Proceedings v McMillan [2020] NZHRRT 19.] 2 [2] Prior to the filing of the proceedings the parties re...

10. [2021] NZACC 70 - Te Miha v ACC (29 April 2021) [pdf, 324 KB]

    ...(NDI), nephrotoxicity and acute kidney injury. [2] The treatment injury claim form noted “likely long-term nephrotoxicity from lithium; possible diabetes insipidus secondary to lithium; and acute kidney injury/high Nat”.1 The claim was filed following three admissions of Ms Te Miha to hospital in 2017. [3] In respect of each claimed injury, there is need to consider whether the claimed injury is a personal injury, whether the claimed injury was caused by treatment and...