Search Results

Search results for Filing.

18707 items matching your search terms

  1. MH v Accident Compensation Corporation (Impairment Assessment) [2025] NZACC 013 (22 January 2025) [pdf, 279 KB]

    ...notifications from the programme, one in November and a second in December. There is no recent update from the programme regarding progress towards [reduced calorie] diet and exercise goals. [26] On 21 January 2024, Mr Stryder, for the appellant filed a review application in respect of the draft IRP issued on 8 November 2023 (see above paragraph [17]): Megan Main, please raise a Review with ICRA over ACC’s Maddie Cottles IRP Decision dated 8.11.23. We disagree with the dates/l...

  7. [2012] NZEmpC 44 Lyttelton Port Co Ltd v Maritime Union of NZ [pdf, 74 KB]

    ...Davenport, counsel for second defendant Judgment: 7 March 2012 ORAL JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE GL COLGAN [1] A little more than 24 hours ago the application for an interlocutory injunction to prevent anticipated unlawful strike action was filed and shortly afterwards there was a telephone conference call with counsel for the parties. Today‟s hearing, which began shortly after 4.30 pm, was arranged, giving the greatest time available to the defendants in particular to prep...

  8. Maori Trustee v Forde - Section 186 Block V Longwood Survey District (2013) 19 Te Waipounamu MB 249 (19 TWP 249) [pdf, 100 KB]

    ...compensation and easement conditions, the application was adjourned to give the parties an opportunity to reach an agreement. The issue of costs was reserved until orders were finalised. [3] Orders were finalised on 17 May 2013. Counsel for the applicant filed a memorandum as to costs dated 30 May 2013, and counsel for the respondents filed a memorandum in reply dated 13 June 2013. The additional parties have not sought costs. Submissions Applicant [4] The applicant seeks an awa...

  9. Deputy Registrar - Taheke 23A and Taheke 23B (2012) 39 Taitokerau MB 264 (39 TTK 264) [pdf, 1.2 MB]

    ...applied to the Chief Judge under s 45 alleging that the 1976 title orders were wrong because the area of Taheke 23A should not have been two acres. I express no view on the s 45 application but observe that, had an application to re-partition been filed, it would have given the Court greater flexibility in deciding the final configuration of 39 Taitokerau MB 269 the titles, including possibly reducing Taheke 23A from 2 acres. The s 45 application has not been concluded. Discu...

  10. [2016] NZEmpC 37 Zespri International Limited v Yu third Interlocutory [pdf, 100 KB]

    ...Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for directions as to key search terms BETWEEN ZESPRI INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Plaintiff AND JOSEPH YU Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on 16 and 23 March, and 5 April, by hearing on 6 April, and by further submissions on draft judgment filed on 15 April 2016 Appearances: M Richards and A Chote, counsel for plaintiff P Skelton QC, counsel for defendant...