Search Results

Search results for Filing.

18705 items matching your search terms

  1. OIA-119293.pdf [pdf, 2.9 MB]

    ...thresholds and Property Managers must be appointed where property is valued above the thresholds. The different appointments are to recognise greater scrutiny is needed of higher value property. • Property Managers have the additional responsibility of filing financial statements with the Family Court. If the Property Manager is an individual, known as a Private Property Manager, the statements must be examined by the Public Trust. The examination is paid for from the represented pers...

  2. [2025] NZREADT 25 – ZA v REAA 2204 & DU (14 July 2025) [pdf, 141 KB]

    ...response, particularly given it allegedly occurred in 2014. The Committee recognised that the Disputes Tribunal had adjudicated on the size of the property and the outgoings payable. THE APPEAL [23] A notice of appeal (29 September 2024) was filed in the Tribunal, along with submissions (29 September 2024) and supporting documents (including an “Updated REA Complaint Form” dated 30 September 2024). [24] The Tribunal issued Minute 1 on 8 November 2024 directing that the appeal...

  3. Waitangi Tribunal - Poverty Bay [pdf, 4.2 MB]

    Rangahaua Whanui Dis t r ic t 5b POVERTY BAY SIÂN DALY February 1997 Working Paper : Firs t Release WA I T A N G I TR I B U N A L R A N G A H A U A W H A N U I S E R I E S Other Rangahaua Whanui reports District reports District 1: Auckland, R Daamen, P Hamer, and B Rigby District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B Bargh District 8: The Alienation of Maori Land in the Rohe Potae, C Marr District 9: The Whanganui District, S Cross and B Bargh District 11a: Wairarapa, P Goldsmith Distri

  6. Regulatory Impact Statement Family Court Review [pdf, 174 KB]

    ...insufficient historical fiscal and statistical data to accurately predict the average costs of performing some tasks associated with Family Court processes. There was insufficient time for piloting proposed processes or for undertaking an historical file review (ie, looking at court documents) to obtain further data than what is recorded in the electronic case management system. There has been extensive consultation on identifying the issues facing the Family Court and the options for r...

  7. Tane v Tanetinorau Opataia Whanau Trust - Hauturu East 7 [2013] Chief Judge's MB 119 (2013 CJ 119) [pdf, 673 KB]

    ...NOlman Tane states that "[i]t was not until 5 December 1996 when the MLC provided a search schedule that we were fully infOlmed of our grandfather's other land interests, such as HE 12, 13 and 14". [9] On 22 December 2003, NOlman Tane filed an application for an order vesting the interests of Purangi Tanetinorau in Hauturu East 8, 12, 13 and 14 blocks in him as the executor ofPurangi Tanetinorau's estate pursuant to s 81 of the Maori Affairs Amendment Act 1967. T...

  8. Memorandum of Counsel for Wellington International Airport Limited (dated 07 May 2018) [pdf, 1.7 MB]

    ...Airport Limited Lane Neave PO Box 25626 Wellington 6146 Solicitor Acting: Amanda Dewar Email: amanda.dewar@laneneave.co.nz Phone: 03 379 3720 Dated: 7 May 2018 lane neave. Page 2 of 4 May it please the Court: 1. This memorandum is filed on behalf of Wellington International Airport Limited (WIAL) in response to the Nineteenth Minute of the Environment Court dated 20 April 2018. 2. This directed WIAL to (in summary): (a) advise the Court when its recommendation for RES...

  9. LCRO Annual Report 2009 [pdf, 520 KB]

    ...increasing applications can be seen. Using that information as a guide a general projection can be made that in the ensuing year up to 200 applications for review will be made. The following graph illustrates the number of applications for review filed each month (includes the 12 th month). 0 5 10 15 20 25 August September October November December January February March April May June July N o . o f re v ie w s Month Application for Reviews Lay Observer Complaint...

  10. LCRO 75/2016 XN and WN v VO (25 February 2019) [pdf, 242 KB]

    ...concluded that there was “insufficient information to determine” this aspect of Mr and Mrs N’s complaint which “would be more appropriately addressed in the Civil Courts”. Application for review [30] In their application for review filed in this Office on 14 April 2016 Mr and Mrs N say the Committee did not consider five aspects of their complaint. They “seek a proper examination and determination” of each aspect, and a finding that Mr VO “acted deceptively”.