Search Results

Search results for Filing.

18704 items matching your search terms

  1. LCRO 78/2017 UT v HB (26 June 2019) [pdf, 346 KB]

    ...Committee regarded matters such as a headstone and plaque for Mr JWS as issues for the beneficiaries “to discuss and agree with Mr HB” and therefore was outside the Committee’s jurisdiction to consider. Application for review [20] Ms UT filed an application for review on 24 April 2017. She asks why Mr HB “did not apply or even try” to apply for a declaration that Mr JWS’s proposed 2009 will was a valid will. She seeks compensation and reimbursement for the burial rel...

  2. [2020] NZEnvC 181 BW Offshore Singapore Pte Ltd v Environmental Protection Authority.pdf [pdf, 1.4 MB]

    ...PTE LIMITED v ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AUTHORITY 2 A: The appeal of BW Offshore Singapore Pty Limited and V Mahindran (BW Offshore) is allowed and the abatement notice is cancelled. B: Costs are reserved. Any application for costs is to be filed within twenty working days, any reply within a further ten working days, and a final reply, if any, five working days thereafter. REASONS Introduction [1] This is an appeal against abatement notices AN003, AN004, AN005 and AN006 iss...

  3. LCRO 24/2017 HC v DASH (24 January 2020) [pdf, 216 KB]

    ...displayed a fundamental lack of understanding of the nature of the transactions; and (c) in respect to the [City] property transaction, he had counselled the need for the parties to obtain independent advice at the outset (29 April 2013). [16] Das filed further submissions to the Standards Committee on 28 September 2016. [17] In providing a summary of Das’s position, his counsel submitted that: (a) Mr HC had acted for multiple parties on the same (or interrelated) transactions...

  4. [2021] NZACC 52 - Thompson v ACC (17 March 2021) [pdf, 230 KB]

    ...position to provide a view that non injury issues are entirely driving his clinical presentation. [41] In relation to a connection between Mr Thompson’s incapacity and the covered injury, Dr Hilliard said: Based on the information on file, my assessment and examination of Mr Thompson, together with the surveillance footage recently shown to me, I can confirm that he has no condition that is causally linked to any covered injury on this claim. [42] On 7 August 2018, Dr A...

  5. [2022] NZEmpC 48 E Tu Inc v Mount Cook Airline Ltd [pdf, 314 KB]

    ...IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed in full from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN E TŪ INCORPORATED Plaintiff AND MOUNT COOK AIRLINE LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 26 May 2021 and further submissions filed on 29 November 2021 and 7 December 2021 (Heard at Christchurch) Appearances: P Cranney, counsel for plaintiff K Thompson, counsel for defendant Judgment: 18 March 2022 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE K G SMITH [1]...

  6. [2024] NZEnvC 090 Bowkett v Whangarei District Council [pdf, 2.3 MB]

    ...ENVIRONMENT COURT A: The stay on the abatement notices ceases on the issue of this decision. B: In respect of the appeals against abatement notices, questions of costs can be applied for by the parties within 20 working days; any reply is to be filed within 10 working days after that; and any final reply, if any, five working days thereafter. C: The Court orders the removal of all the gabion baskets, the plinth, and the boat ramp (including the mattress gabion baskets underneat...

  7. KC v Accident Compensation Corporation (Mental Injury and Social Rehabilitation) [2023] NZACC 011 [pdf, 276 KB]

    ...SPILLER [Date of mental injury - s 36(1); claim for rehabilitation assistance outside New Zealand – s 128; and claim for cover for mental injury, ss 20 and 25, Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] The appellant has filed the following appeals: (a) Appeal 155/22 is against a review decision dated 29 August 2022. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review of the Corporation’s decision dated 23 May 2022 advising that the date of the appellant...

  8. [2023] NZEnvC 154 Middle Hill Ltd v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.4 MB]

    ...The appeal was upheld to the extent that the zoning for the Middle Hill site (known as Area D) was changed to General Business. [2] We directed, in paragraphs B and [263] that a draft order setting out the amendments to Plan Change 25 was to be filed for our consideration: B: Amendments to plan change 25 are to be made as follows: (i) traffic rules are to be made in terms of those agreed between the parties and described in paragraph [88]; (ii) provision is to be made for a 3-me...

  10. [2019] NZEnvC 125 Schmuck v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 2.7 MB]

    ...to the Court 10 working days thereafter. B: In the event that any party disagrees with that final consents and conditions, they are to provide separate memoranda identifying the clause and dispute, their preferred wording and why. That is to be filed within a further 10 working days. D G SCHMUCK v NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL 2 C: The Court will then conclude whether it can proceed on the papers or will need to convene a further hearing. D: Given our conclusion on jurisdiction,...