Search Results

1. Hojsgaard – Part OLC 127 (1997) 5 Taitokerau Appellate MB 159 (5 APWH 159) [pdf, 3 MB]

   ...Chief Registrar Maori Land Court. ._. I .;?:F><. '-?:r.= I ~ tl _"'~_ . :: It ... I,.. ....-. ~ .~~! T :~.,:_ I~. t=............ .. - ... -- .. - -- -. '. . - - - -----------..---- Fcll~ Ib7 9 - If the appellant files a submission objecting, Mr Mathias to be served, he to have two weeks to answer. j The $400 costs of record to be re~ed bv the Registrar. Dated ., Ro' on U-s \<?; I day0' .-s,J ~ 1997. - ,.- - j:: -fI=: ;:t - - ... -f-�...

2. Auckland Standards Committee 3 v PL [2016] NZLCDT 12 [pdf, 59 KB]

   ...not ignore the possibility that the transaction may have proceeded to completion. (i) The respondent has an unblemished record having been in practise in excess of 30 years and is held in high regard by his community attested to by affidavits filed in his support. [18] The Tribunal accepts these mitigatory factors except to acknowledge the receipt of evidence from the applicant, referable to penalty, as to the respondent 7 having a finding of unsatisfactory conduct in May 20...

3. IJ v QT LCRO 94 / 2011 (18 January 2012) [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...fashion. All parties agreed to this proposal and a further review hearing took place by teleconference. The participants were the Practitioner and his counsel, and Mrs T. [9] Notwithstanding the unfortunate procedural pathways that this review file has taken, there has been no prejudice to either party in this review. The Practitioner was given a full opportunity to hear the main arguments of the Applicant (through his wife) and had an opportunity to respond to those matters....

4. Auckland Standards Committee v Eteuati [2009] NZLCDT 17 [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...Following the practitioner’s initial meeting with the complainant she failed or refused to meet with her client on request or otherwise communicate with her or her representatives concerning the appeal. She failed or refused to hand over the file in respect of the appeal on request as a result of which the complainant has suffered a loss of important records concerning her medical history. [3] The conduct of the practitioner exposed the complainant in the submission of the Soci...

5. 2018 NZSSAA 002 (10 January 2018) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...is therefore not a matter that is within our jurisdiction to determine, it is a distinct issue that should have been the subject of a request for a review. Perhaps anticipating that jurisdiction would be an issue, on 24 November 2017 Mr Howell filed an email stating that he was attaching his submissions. He did not seek leave to file them out of time. He also attached his submissions to the BRC stating: These are provided to show the issues raised before it to show the scope...

6. HJ v MN LCRO 26/2013 (11 March 2015) [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...appointed Mr SE as liquidator in early December 2010.2 [6] Mr HJ appears to have been very open with Mr SE, and Mr SE in turn objected to advice Mr MN had provided in relation the company’s obligations to IRD and his refusal to disgorge his file or the deed of release of the GSA. [7] Mr HJ sent a letter generally outlining his interactions with Mr MN, and querying his conduct and the advice he had provided.3 Standards Committee [8] The Standards Committee distilled 10 areas o...

7. Complaints Assessments Committee 403 v Misa NZREADT 11 [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...the parties had agreed to a statement of facts and that Mr Misa would admit the first charge on the basis of the agreed facts. In the circumstances, the Committee seeks leave to withdraw the second charge. [3] Counsel for the parties have also filed submissions as to penalty. The Charge Factual background (taken from the agreed statement of facts) [4] Mr Misa is a licensed salesperson, and at the relevant time was engaged by Harcourts BRCE in Manurewa (“the Agency”). The c...

8. Paraone-Kawiti v Maori Trustee - Pukahakaha East 5B [2013] Chief Judge's MB 354 (2013 CJ 354) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...Tukaiteuri". [2] At this hearing and following the decision counsel for the applicant raised the issue of costs. Counsel for the respondent stated that he did not have any issues with respect to costs. [3] On 11 November 2011 counsel for the applicant filed a memorandum seeking costs as follows: (a) An order as to costs pursuant to s 79 ofTe Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 (the Act) to pay the costs of the applicant attending the 19 March 2010 hearing of $1,135.84 to be paid by...

9. Zhai v The Real Estate Agents Authority [2018] NZREADT 33 [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...2017 CE, and that he was not eligible to apply for a new licence for a period of five years after the cancellation. [12] Mr Zhai was also advised of his right to apply for review of the Registrar’s decision, under s 112 of the Act. Mr Zhai filed an application to review the Registrar’s decision on 20 March 2018. Submissions [13] Mr Zhai said in his application for review: I am writing to you to explain the reasons for not completing the 2017 calendar year verifiable conti...

10. Vertongen v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 413) and Dunlop [2018] NZREADT 44 [pdf, 235 KB]

    ...____________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL ____________________________________________________________________ [1] The background to this proceeding is accurately set out in the submissions that were filed on behalf of the first respondent by counsel, Mr Simpson. The following statement is taken largely from his submissions. [2] Mr Vertongen (the Appellant) appeals against the decision of Complaints Assessment Committ...