Search Results

1. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Halse [2021] NZLCDT 7 (19 March 2021) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...the outset of the hearing, the practitioner faced two charges of unsatisfactory conduct. The first related to conflicting interests (Rule 5); the other to acting for more than one party (Rule 6). Having read the evidence-in-chief and submissions filed by both parties, our provisional view was that the second charge (Rule 6) seemed insubstantial. Although Mr Halse acted on both sides of the loan transactions, he obtained informed consent – many times over the years – as require...

2. LCRO 78/2019 EW v PT and AM (3 February 2021) [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...CONCERNING a determination of [AREA] Standards Committee X BETWEEN EW Applicant AND PT and AM Respondents The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr EW filed an Application for Review dated 19 June 2019, received in this Office on 20 June 2019. Part 2 of the application form requires the name of the other party to the review to be completed. Mr EW named the other party as being [Law Firm A]...

3. WXY v Attorney-General (Strike-Out Application) [2014] NZHRRT 37 [pdf, 59 KB]

   1 (1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAMES, ADDRESS OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE PLAINTIFFS AND OF THEIR CHILDREN (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT 37 Reference No. HRRT 007/2014 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN WXY PLAINTIFFS AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL IN RESPECT OF THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH DEFENDANT...

4. [2019] NZEmpC 126 Postal Workers Union of Aotearoa Inc v New Zealand Post Ltd [pdf, 341 KB]

   ...half.7 Costs reserved [28] Costs are reserved. If they cannot be resolved between the parties, the Postal Workers Union may apply to the Court within 20 working days of the date of this judgment. NZ Post then has 14 working days within which to file and serve its response, with any reply from the Postal Workers Union to be filed within a further five working days. J C Holden Judge Judgment signed at 2 pm on 11 September 2019...

5. LCRO 153/2017 ACE v BDF (28 September 2018) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...his contact time with the children. She complains that Mr BDF did not take any action to further her objectives. [8] Ms ACE considers that Mr BDF: had a moral duty to encourage me to involve the authorities or to do that himself (for example, file a report of concern with CYF) or at the very least immediately act on these suspicions within the court environment as he had been asked to. [9] She alleged that Mr BDF’s inactivity continued for some two years. [10] Ms ACE also comp...

6. Worksheet - Inspector staff and DLC member costs [xlsx, 33 KB]

   ...year Not applicable DLC chair 0 costs used in "licensing decisions" worksheet DLC member 1 0 DLC member 2 0 DLC member 3 0 Use of Spreadsheet “Inspector, Staff and DLC member costs”   This spreadsheet file has four worksheets, designed to assist a TA to record and calculate staff costs relating to alcohol licensing. NB: in these sheets, cells highlighted in yellow need to be filled in. Cells highlighted in red need to be filled in from another...

7. [2020] NZEnvC 101 Southland District Council v Chartres & Otherspdf [pdf, 744 KB]

   ...heard? (18] Counsel for the Council submits16 that the details of the interim orders are not unduly contentious, and therefore a hearing is not necessary nor is it necessary for the respondents to be provided an opportunity to make submissions or file evidence. [19] Given the history of the discussions and complaints as set out in Mr Roy's affidavit17 , and the fact that Mr Chartres has been aware of this application (in draft) and the Council's position for quite some time...

8. [2020] NZEnvC 131 Caradoc Davies v Clearwater [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...application for suspension. [7] Subsequent to my February decision the Clearwaters applied to the Council for a variation of the consent under s127 RMA to correct the problems, before lodging this fresh application. Analysis [8] All parties filed submissions and spoke to them in the hearing, at the end of which I reserved the Court’s decision. [9] It is apparent from the s127 decision of the senior planner under delegated authority dated 6 May 2020, that the two prime matters...

9. [2020] NZEnvC 163 Lindis Catchment Group Incorporated v Otago Regional Council.pdf [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...reply5 suggesting relevant amendments to be made as per the Orders in each decision. A memorandum on behalf of the Council dated 17 September 2020, accompanying affidavits of Mr M A Hickey and Mr B Cowie, and a final suite of conditions have been filed to reflect the relevant changes sought. [4] No other party has made submissions on the water permits which are the subject of this decision. However, the LCG and ORC confirm that their response6 has been prepared with the bene...

10. [2019] NZEmpC 110 A Labour Inspector v Gill Pizza Limited [pdf, 244 KB]

    ...from the Court, and (2) if found to be employees, need to return to the Authority for determination as to the workers’ substantive entitlements. The procedural complexity and its associated costs, including time, effort and financial costs (filing fees in the Court for a s 6(5) application being $306.67, together with a hearing fee for each half day of $250.44; $71.56 (filing fee) and $153.33 (hearing fee) respectively in the Authority together with any legal costs of representat...