Search Results

1. NZCVS Cycle 4 2020-21 Methodology Report [pdf, 5.1 MB]

   ...COVID-19 impact 19 Stage 2: Dwelling selection 19 Main sample 19 Fieldwork processes 20 Māori booster sample 20 Stage 3: Respondent selection 20 Probabilities of selection 21 PSUs 21 Dwellings 21 Respondents 22 Process for incorporating address files 22 3. Questionnaire design 24 Introduction 24 Mode of interviewing 24 The questionnaire 26 Selection of incidents 28 Selection of incident scenarios 28 Individual and cluster victim forms 29 Offence codes 29 Victim definition 2...

2. NZCVS Methodology Report Cycle 2 (2019) [pdf, 4.9 MB]

   ...selection 19 Stage 2: Dwelling selection 19 Main sample 19 Fieldwork processes 19 Māori booster sample 20 Stage 3: Respondent selection 20 Probabilities of selection 21 PSUs 21 Dwellings 21 Respondents 22 Process for incorporating address files 22 3. Questionnaire, incident selection and automated offence coding 24 Introduction 24 Mode of interviewing 24 The questionnaire 26 Selection of incidents 28 Selection of incident scenarios 28 Individual and cluster victim forms 28 O...

3. NZCVS 2023 Methodology Report (Cycle 6) [pdf, 4.3 MB]

   ...COVID-19 impact 18 Stage 2: Dwelling selection 18 Main sample 18 Fieldwork processes 19 Māori booster sample 19 Stage 3: Respondent selection 19 Probabilities of selection 20 PSUs 20 Dwellings 20 Respondents 21 Process for incorporating address files 21 3. Questionnaire design 23 Introduction 23 Mode of interviewing 23 Computer-assisted video interviewing 24 The questionnaire 25 Selection of incidents 27 Selection of incident scenarios 27 Individual and cluster victim forms...

4. [2010] NZEmpC 142 Wang v Hamilton Multicultural Services Trust [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...failure to supply Mr Wang with a copy of the original Treasurer’s Review Report, which preceded the redundancy, the Trust was held to be deficient and Mr Wang received an award of $1,000. That has been paid to him. [5] On 8 January 2010, Mr Wang filed a challenge in this Court relating to the whole of the determination and seeking a hearing de novo. [6] In May 2009, prior to the termination of his employment, Mr Wang had lodged in the Authority another employment relationship...

5. [2008] NZEmpC CC 8/08 Butcher V OCS Ltd [pdf, 80 KB]

   ...were limited to the factual findings of the Authority and the directions given by Judge Couch when determining the nature and extent of the hearing pursuant to s182(3)(b) of the Employment Relations Act 2000. That enabled the parties to file an agreed statement of facts, which they have not chosen to do, and to provide a bundle of documents which were the same as the documents presented to the Authority. The hearing was confined to liability. Because of these limitations...

6. Tipene v Tipene - Motatau 2 Section 49A4F(2014) 85 Taitokerau MB 2 (85 TTK 2) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...after that on 26 February 2011, Tania was told she would be required to pay rent of $50 per week for the right to occupy the house. [5] Tania left the house approximately four months later in protest at the rental policy. [6] Tania subsequently filed a notice of intention to appear to oppose Joseph’s application. Tania says: 1 The Trust imposed rent which was unfavourable to me as they did not consider compensation or recognition for the renovations or that I still had two depen...

7. Bhana v Paniora - Wairau North 1B2C (2013) 69 Taitokerau 139 (69 TTK 139) [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...Bulla and Reihana both agreed that this meeting was a waste of time. Without karakia whakamutunga they both stood up and left. [24] No one disputed the minutes. The application [25] Shortly after the meeting, on 23 June 2011, Barbara Bhana filed the application for an occupation order. In December 2011 she filed additional material in support, including a letter from the Far North District Council (“the Council”) setting out its requirements, correspondence from a local kau...

8. LD & KL Trust v MT & HB LCRO 25/2015 (15 April 2016) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...the complaint 37 Letter JK to LCS (26 September 2013). 16 made contact with Mr JK and advised him that a complaint could not be processed as being against “[Law Firm A]” as that firm was not an incorporated law firm. [76] I note from a file note of the discussion with Mr JK38 [77] Messrs MT and HB instructed [Law Firm B] to respond to the complaint on their behalf. Ms BL that he suggested the complaint could be processed against all of the directors of the nominee company,...

9. Berry v Rondel LCRO 130 / 2011 (26 April 2012) - Penalty Decision [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...Travel to [...] This claim is for $200.00 for trips to and from lawyers in [...]. Ms Berry records that the distance each way is 65 km. Mr AK objects to this claim because he says there is no explanation of why the trips were necessary when the files could have been sent direct to the [...] lawyers. Given that the amount claimed is minimal, I do not intend to pursue Ms Berry for further explanations and will allow this claim. 9 Mr Rondel’s accounts These are dealt w...

10. Family Legal Advice Service Operational Policy v1.8 June 2018 [pdf, 1 MB]

    ...Clients seeking funded legal assistance for just completing court entry forms may access the full Family Legal Advice Service, subject to them meeting financial eligibility requirements. If an application for a parenting or guardianship order is filed in the Family Court, the service is available to assist the respondent (if eligible) to prepare a notice of response. More detail as to the specific breakdown of tasks within each activity can be found in Appendix 5. Not included as par...