Search Results

1. Induction guide for legal aid providers - v1.4 June 2017 [pdf, 649 KB]

   ...all questions the best they can and provide the necessary documents. Before sending the application to your legal aid office, must make sure it: • is fully completed including all financial details • includes any supporting information • is filed before the matter has been finally disposed of by a Court or tribunal. Incomplete applications If an application is incomplete or missing essential information, the grants officer will write to you and your client to request the infor...

2. Green - Estate of George Amos [2002] Chief Judge's MB 54 (2002 CJ 54) [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...Office, and Horahora 1 A4B and 1 A4E at the Maori Land Court. The amount required of $84,000 was also received by the Maori Trustee and the settlement of the three Horahora Blocks was concluded. 2.11 On 21 September 1998 the Estate of George Amos filed the application to the Chief Judge pursuant to section 45/93 requesting the orders of confirmation made on 2016/1980 in respect to Horahora 1 A4B, 1 A4E and 1 A4F be cancelled. 2.12 Between the 517/1999 and 717/1999 an inquiry was und...

3. Johnson v CAC 20003 & Harvey [2016] NZREADT 68 [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...finding against him. [3] The appeal and cross-appeal were heard in Nelson on 15 and 16 August 2016, as a de novo hearing. Both the Johnsons and Mr Harvey gave and called evidence on their behalf, and witnesses were cross-examined. Submissions were filed following the hearing: for the Johnsons on 22 August 2016, for Mr Harvey on 30 August 2016, and for the Authority on 5 September 2016. [4] The Tribunal records that when Mr Harvey filed his appeal, he applied for interim and perm...

4. [2019] NZEmpC 123 Elisara v Allianz New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 319 KB]

   ...[67] A permanent non-publication order is made in the terms set out at [65] above. [68] It is hoped that in the circumstances, the parties can agree on the issue of costs. If that does not prove possible, I will receive memoranda, with the company filing and serving any memorandum within 28 days of the date of this judgment, any response within a further 14 days, and anything strictly in reply within a further seven days. Christina Inglis Chief Judge...

5. Te Manutukutuku 74 [pdf, 11 MB]

   ...commissioned by the Tribunal was undertaken dur­ ing 2017 and 2018. The Tribunal held four hearings between August 2018 and June 2019. Following the final hearing of claimant and Crown evi­ dence in August 2019, written clos­ ing submissions will be filed and the Tribunal will prepare its report on the claims. In the third, the Tribunal will hear the claims of Ngāti Raukawa and affiliated groups, other claim­ ants not yet heard, and issues affecting Māori across the dis­ trict...

6. [2020] NZEnvC 159 Upper Clutha Environmental Society Incorporated v Queenstown Lakes District Council.pdf [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   ...provisions may file memoranda of counsel in reply on any point of disagreement with what QLDC so provides or proposes ... Supplementary submissions [6] Queenstown Lakes District Council ('QLDC') consulted with parties interested in the EZF and filed a memorandum of counsel responding to the court's directions ('28 April memorandum').3 This attached a copy of Decision 2.2's Ch 3 provisions marked up with amendments that QLDC proposes. [7] Reply memoranda...

7. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Fendall [2018] NZLCDT 26 [pdf, 349 KB]

   ...5 [15] In addition, she gave evidence that she had made a number of appearances for long standing Youth Court clients for which she did not charge, but which she did not declare to the insurer. [16] Further false declarations were filed in October 2012, November 2012, December 2012, January 2013, February 2013, May 2013, August 2013, October 2013 and November 2013. [17] In November 2013 Sovereign engaged a private investigator to carry out surveillance of Ms Fendall

8. Mokaraka v Mokaraka - Waima C8 [2022] Māori Appellate Court MB 17 (2022 Appeal 17) [pdf, 343 KB]

   ...direction, we noted:4 [6] In reviewing the matter the coram have determined that the issue of jurisdiction, in regards section 44(5) of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, needs to be addressed prior to hearing the matter. Counsel for the respondents filed submissions dated 11 October 2021. However, despite being notified, the appellants did not file any submissions. Te take The issue The issue for determination is whether the Court has jurisdiction to proceed with the present...

9. [2021] NZEmpC 198 Head v Chief Executive of the Inland Revenue Department [pdf, 388 KB]

   ...Furthermore, an incorrect procedure was initially adopted, which resulted in IR having to apply to the Court for necessary directions as to the correct process for such an application. [14] Over eight months, multiple amended statements of claim were filed as late as one week prior to the commencement of the hearing. IR incurred additional costs by having to file amended statements of defence. [15] The addition of new plaintiffs also resulted in a requirement for further...

10. [2021] NZEmpC 120 Lye v ISO Ltd [pdf, 285 KB]

    ...determination was challenged. By the time the matter was heard Mr Seymour was no longer employed by ISO. Mr Lye, who was one of the original applicants in 2018, and remains employed by ISO, stepped into his shoes.15 [16] Amended pleadings were filed with Mr Lye challenging the whole of the 2019 determination. As well as seeking a compliance order, he claimed relief requiring ISO to be compelled to comply with the availability provisions in ss 67D and 67E of the Act by means of ag...