Search Results

1. MacDonald v MacDonald - Wairau Block XII Section 6C2C [2016] Māori Appellate Court MB 259 (2016 APPEAL 259) [pdf, 276 KB]

   ...TWP 68). 2016 Maori Appellate Court MB 261 take it over at valuation. The parties were subsequently unable to agree on the valuation of the land, and the negotiations between them in relation to the land broke down. [6] Phillip filed an application for partition proposing to divide the land at its narrowest point, with the front half comprising two-thirds of the vineyard and the road frontage to Wairau Bar Rd, and the rear portion comprising the remaining one-third of...

2. [2019] NZSAAA 1 (4 February 2019) [pdf, 417 KB]

   ...agent. On 28th March the Secretary upheld the original decision. At the end of April the appellant appealed to this Authority. [4] The basic facts are not in dispute – although it has to be said that there is some confusion, both in original file and in the Secretary’s decision and the Ministry’s Regulation 37(2) Report, over the precise nature of the relationship between the appellant and Mr and Mrs M over the period she was in their care and subsequently. In 2001, at the age o...

3. [2018] NZEnvC 151 NZ Energy & Ngati Rangi v Manawatu Wanganui Regional Council [pdf, 3 MB]

   ...flows at the locations identified in condition 11 for the 1 New Zealand Energy Ltd duration of this consent. 10 All flow and water level records shall be transferred at least twice daily at approximately 12 hourly intervals, to the Council via File Transfer Protocol (FTP) and be in a format compatible with the Manawatu-Regional Council's system 11 Structures and equipment for the purpose of flow measurement and recording shall be installed and operated at the following locat...

4. [2022] NZREADT 1 - DU v Real Estate Agents Authority & DC (1 February 2022) [pdf, 333 KB]

   ...of the other offer. Submissions of the Authority [89] In her submissions of 15 October 2021, Ms Bergin, counsel for the Authority, submits that the Tribunal should not strike out the appeal, as requested by the licensee. The parties have now filed submissions and the Tribunal is in a position to make a decision on the appeal. Considering the substance of the appeal is consistent with the consumer focus protection of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 (the Act). It is noted that th...

5. [2024] NZEmpC 198 Fredricsen and anor v Air New Zealand Ltd and Air New Zealand Ltd v Fredricsen and anor [pdf, 305 KB]

   ...after 30 September 2021, due to a regulatory change from the Government, so that any disadvantage from that date could not be said to be unjustified. Therefore, no compensation was awarded for any loss arising after that date.5 [4] Both Captains filed a non-de novo challenge in relation to the quantum of remedies ordered by the Authority. Air NZ filed a de novo challenge to the Authority’s determination. The two challenges were consolidated, and the hearing progressed on a de...

6. [2024] NZREADT 40 - CAC v Tafilipepe (25 October 2024) [pdf, 367 KB]

   ...M Clement, counsel The defendant: J R Smith, counsel SUBJECT TO NON-PUBLICATION ORDER DECISION (Charge and Penalty) Dated 25 October 2024 2 INTRODUCTION [1] Complaints Assessment Committee 2204 (the Committee) filed Charges in the Tribunal against Sonia Tafilipepe. She is charged with misconduct under s 73(a) of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 (Act), being disgraceful conduct. In the alternative, Ms Tafilipepe is charged with misconduct under s 7...

7. [2007] NZEmpC WC 16/07 J v Commissioner of Police [pdf, 10 KB]

   ...suppression order was made in the following terms. [2] There is a suppression order made prohibiting the publication of the plaintiff’s name and any details which might lead to her identification. On the basis of the medical and other evidence filed on behalf of the plaintiff and the nature of the allegations in the statement of problem, I am satisfied that at this stage her private interests outweigh the public interest in knowing her identity at least until the case has been...

8. [2011] NZEmpC 30 Van Interiors Ltd v Malik [pdf, 9 KB]

   ...April 2011 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE GL COLGAN [1] This challenge is dismissed for non-compliance with court directions and for want of prosecution. [2] As long ago as 23 August 2010 the Court, by minute, required the plaintiff to file and serve an amended statement of claim that complied with reg 11 of the Employment Court Regulations 2000. Despite repeated reminders to the plaintiff by the Registrar, when the matter came before me on 21 March 2011 I issued a further...

9. [2011] NZEmpC 155 Te Runanga O Kirikiriroa Trust Inc v Allen [pdf, 41 KB]

   ...ARC 122/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN TE RUNANGA O KIRIKIRIROA TRUST INCORPORATED Plaintiff AND MALLORY ALLEN Defendant Hearing: By memorandum filed on 24 November 2011 Appearances: Alex Hope, counsel for plaintiff Rose Alchin, counsel for defendant Judgment: 29 November 2011 CONSENT JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C INGLIS [1] The parties have settled this challenge and cross-c...

10. [2012] NZEmpC 72 Borrill v Elite Fitness Equipment Ltd [pdf, 41 KB]

    ...paid by way of weekly instalments of $50.00. The first payment is to be made within five working days of today’s date. 1 [2011] NZERA Auckland 331. [6] A notice of discontinuance will be filed forthwith. [7] There is no issue as to costs. Christina Inglis Judge Judgment signed at 2pm on 1 May 2012