Search Results

Search results for Filing.

18677 items matching your search terms

  1. [2019] NZEnvC 022 Fitzgerald v Kaikoura District Council [pdf, 1.8 MB]

    ...each LOT. All new services shall be laid underground. As-Built Plans 19. The consent holder shall submit to Council as-built drawings of all new and existing services created. 20. Two A3 size copies of as-built plans and copies of the electronic files (e .g .. dwg or .dxf files) showing all works and information as detailed in NZS 4404:2010 Schedule 1D. 21. Plans shall be cert ified by a suitably-qua lified person stating that they are a true and accurate record. 22. Where the n...

  2. C v I [2018] NZIACDT 20 (18 June 2018) [pdf, 213 KB]

    ...should identify what his claims are for the refund of fees (apparently the whole of the fees paid), the amount of any compensation and the grounds for requiring Mr I to pay compensation. Timetable [31] The Registrar and the complainant may file submissions regarding sanctions within 10 working days of the issue of this decision. [32] Mr I’s representatives may file a reply within a further 10 working days. [33] Any party may apply to vary the timetable. 9 Public...

  3. Q v I [2018] NZIACDT 16 (18 June 2018) [pdf, 214 KB]

    ...should identify what his claims are for the refund of fees (apparently the whole of the fees paid), the amount of any compensation and the grounds for requiring Mr I to pay compensation. Timetable [31] The Registrar and the complainant may file submissions regarding sanctions within 10 working days of the issue of this decision. [32] Mr I’s representatives may file a reply within a further 10 working days. [33] Any party may apply to vary the timetable. Publication of the ad...

  4. Q v I [2018] NZIACDT 18 (18 June 2018) [pdf, 213 KB]

    ...what his claims are for the refund of fees (apparently the whole of the fees paid), the amount of any compensation and the grounds for requiring Mr I to pay compensation. 9 Timetable [31] The Registrar and the complainant may file submissions regarding sanctions within 10 working days of the issue of this decision. [32] Mr I’s representatives may file a reply within a further 10 working days. [33] Any party may apply to vary the timetable. Publication of the a...

  5. [2019] NZSSAA 40 (21 May 2019) [pdf, 189 KB]

    ...of XXXX’s rights. [2.2] If the Authority could consider evidence that XXXX received income, then he disputed that the money deposited into his bank account was income, so he says it did not affect his benefit entitlements. [3] The Ministry filed a report, which appeared to contain a record of XXXX’s benefit status, his entitlements, the income he potentially received and calculations concerning the calculation of an overpayment. It was only contentious in the respects identi...

  6. Chen v Christchurch City Council [pdf, 31 KB]

    ...Developments Limited and Sonic Properties Limited. Mr Dalziel accepts that he was responsible for closing the two development companies into liquation in 2001 shortly after the units had been sold. 12. Mr Dalziel spoke to the witness brief he filed dated 16 March 2009. Mr Dalziel said he was the owner and director of a company that purchased land at 32 Cranmer Square, Christchurch. He was not a property developer “as the company was formed for business reasons and was...

  7. Brightwell - Okauia B3B1 Block (2017) 135 Waikato Maniapoto MB121 (135 WMN 121) [pdf, 202 KB]

    ...Brightwell, Irene Collins and Marree Keepa Judgment: 15 February 2017 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE S TE A MILROY 135 Waikato Maniapoto MB 122 Introduction [1] Evelyn Kaye Brightwell filed an application on 26 February 2016 for succession to her mother Evelyn Elizabeth Douglas, who died on 15 November 2014. The application was expressed to be on behalf of the trustees of the William Donovan Douglas Whānau Trust, whic...

  8. KIT v Zhu [2019] NZIACDT 46 sanctions (8 July 2019) [pdf, 126 KB]

    ...in the process, it has not been shown this led to any loss to the complainant either. It is conceivable that had Mr Zhu been personally engaged earlier with the complainant, he may have discovered the interim visitor visa and therefore delayed filing the student application or better explained it at the outset. Certainly, he should have investigated the complainant’s immigration status prior to lodging the student visa. I note though that this specific head of complaint, acting w...

  9. [2020] NZIACDT 52 - TBE v Proudman (4 December 2020) [pdf, 202 KB]

    ...Africa, was offered a position in New Zealand while working in Australia. His prospective employer engaged Fragomen to assist with immigration to New Zealand. He was contacted by Ms Proudman in April 2018. [7] On 10 July 2018, Ms Proudman filed with Immigration New Zealand work visa applications for the complainant and his wife, and dependent child student visa applications for their daughter and son. [8] Immigration New Zealand approved visas for the complainant and his son o...

  10. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Kennelly [2020] NZLCDT 6 [pdf, 143 KB]

    ...COUNSEL Mr P Davey for the applicant Mr D Neutze for the respondent 2 REASONS FOR THE DECISION OF THE NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL CONCERNING LIABILITY AND PENALTY Introduction [1] The applicant filed a charge against Mr Kennelly under s 241 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (the Act) which was framed as misconduct consisting of a wilful or reckless contravention of rule 10.3 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: C...