Search Results

1. [2021] NZEnvC 136 The Canyon Vineyard Ltd v Central Otago District Council [pdf, 507 KB]

   ...unacceptable visual impact from the Canyon site, including from the Function Centre; and • Lot 4 has an unacceptable visual impact from the road and from the historic schoolhouse premises. 4 The revised proposal [9] After the appeal was filed, further revisions were made to the application, such that Bendigo’s proposal now entails: (a) subdivision of land bounded by Blue Mines Road into 14 lots; (b) land use consent for the creation of residential building platforms on...

2. People remanded and offending on bail December 2023 [xlsx, 104 KB]

   ...extracted using updated methodology. All data in this workbook is based on the charge outcome year of the finalised charge and excludes organisations. Previous data for people remanded and offending on bail has been based on the year the bail charge was filed or the year the offence committed on bail occurred. Contents: Table 1a: Number and percentage of people with finalised charges who were remanded on bail or in custody, by remand type, 2014 - 2023 Table 1b: Number and percentage of peop...

3. People remanded and offending on bail jun2024 [xlsx, 104 KB]

   ...extracted using updated methodology. All data in this workbook is based on the charge outcome year of the finalised charge and excludes organisations. Previous data for people remanded and offending on bail has been based on the year the bail charge was filed or the year the offence committed on bail occurred. Contents: Table 1a: Number and percentage of people with finalised charges who were remanded on bail or in custody, by remand type, 2014/2015 - 2023/2024 Table 1b: Number and percenta...

4. [2011] NZEmpC 78 NZ Tramways and Public Passenger Transport Employees Union & Ors v Wellington City Transport Ltd [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...Transport Limited, as a local authority trading enterprise. All resignation and retirement gratuities contained in the earlier regulations were 1 WA 172/10. retained. The statement of problem filed on behalf of the applicants records subsequent developments: All subsequent agreements with Wellington City Transport Limited (both under Wellington City Council and private ownership as Stagecoach & Infratil) through to the cur...

5. [2012] NZEmpC 39 Imperial Tobacco New Zealand Limited v Pereira [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...Burt and Sarah Backhouse, counsel for the plaintiff Carolyn Heaton, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 2 March 2012 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A D FORD The application [1] On 15 February 2012, the plaintiff (Imperial Tobacco) filed a statement of claim electing under s 179 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act) to have the whole of a determination 1 of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) dated 25 January 2012 heard de novo by this Court. T...

6. [2009] NZEmpC WC 4/09 Tse v Cieffe NZ Ltd [pdf, 39 KB]

   ...this. An oral agreement was reached about the way the relationship would operate. Her principal work was on the company’s internal system. She was to scan all of the company’s existing archived documentation so it could be electronically filed and searched. She also had some reception duties and general office administration duties to do. [13] Payment was negotiated at an hourly rate. The job was part time for 20 hours a week. They expressly agreed that she would invoi...

7. [2009] NZEmpC WC 4/09 Tse v Cieffe NZ Ltd [pdf, 39 KB]

   ...this. An oral agreement was reached about the way the relationship would operate. Her principal work was on the company’s internal system. She was to scan all of the company’s existing archived documentation so it could be electronically filed and searched. She also had some reception duties and general office administration duties to do. [13] Payment was negotiated at an hourly rate. The job was part time for 20 hours a week. They expressly agreed that she would invoi...

8. [2010] NZEmpC 41 Shortland v Alexander Construction Co Ltd [pdf, 38 KB]

   ...[45] I wish to commend both counsel for the concise manner in which this case was formulated and for the efficient manner in which the hearing was conducted. Costs [46] Costs are reserved. If they cannot be agreed, Mr Petherick is to file and serve a memorandum by 14 May 2010. Mr Webster is then to have 21 days to file and serve a memorandum in response. AA Couch Judge Judgment delivered orally at 4.41 pm on Tuesday 13 April 2010...

9. [2012] NZEmpC 8 Gazeley v Oceania Group (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...substantive merits of Mrs Gazeley’s personal grievance remain before the Authority. [6] As usual, where only interim relief is in issue, evidence was provided by affidavit. Mrs Gazeley swore three affidavits and 12 affidavits by other persons were filed in support of her claim. Those other deponents were Mrs Gazeley’s husband, five employees or former employees of Woodlands, three relatives of residents at Woodlands and three women who have worked with Mrs Gazeley at other f...

10. [2012] NZEmpC 17 Transpacific Industries Group (NZ) Ltd v Harris & Others [pdf, 90 KB]

    ...claim for unpaid commission. [29] Transpacific is directed to file and serve within 20 working days after the date of this judgment a statement of claim complying with regulation 11 of the Employment Court Regulations 2000. The usual period for filing and serving statements of defence will then apply. Comment [30] This matter has become a test case about whether clause 7.1 is generally unenforceable. Mr Harris has been chosen by Transpacific as the individual defendant. That...