Search Results

1. Rupapera v Katene - Ngāti Tu 22D Trust (2008) 209 Aotea MB 25 (209 AOT 25) [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   ...of the Companies Office records, say that the directors and shareholders, with 50 shares each, are the second respondent and Miriama Manuirirangi. J understand Mrs Manuirirangi is the second respondent's wife. [3] The applicants have also filed an application for the enforcement of obligations of trust raising a number of additional concerns about the trust's accounts, expenditure and in general terms the mandate and authority of the first and second respondents to act.

2. LCRO 3/2018 MA v JE and BN (19 June 2018) [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...that all correspondence was routinely sent to Ms MA, although Mr JE acknowledges it is possible that a letter from [Law Firm 2] advising the property would be sold may not have been sent. That letter arrived about the time Mr JE transferred the file to Ms BN, at which point Ms BN says she discussed Ms MA’s position with her at length based on what [Law Firm 2] had advised in its letter. [14] Mr JE says that in his telephone conversations with Ms MA he was at pains to outline he...

3. Letter to submitters on Panuku Development Auckland Limited [pdf, 339 KB]

   ...by the Environment Court after the deadline will not entitle the submitter to become a party to the proceedings unless an application under section 281 of the Act is made, and subsequently granted, to waive the statutory time frame within which to file and serve the section 274 notice. There is no filing fee for lodging a section 274 notice. A waiver of the usual requirement to serve copies of any section 274 notices on “all other parties" other than the Applicant (Panuku) and t...

4. Pace - Margaret Rose Karaka [2018] Chief Judge's MB 86 (2018 CJ 86) [pdf, 407 KB]

   ...18 May 2018 DECISION OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC 2018 Chief Judge’s MB 87 Introduction [1] This application filed by Justin James Pace (“the applicant”) pursuant to s 45 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 seeks to amend a succession order dated 28 January 1987 at 221 Rotorua MB 8 relating to Margaret Rose Karaka (“the deceased”) who is the gr

5. [2017] EmpC 156 Coomer v JA McCallum & Son Ltd [pdf, 309 KB]

   ...party. It submitted that the Court should not interfere with the decision. [26] While both parties analysed the Authority’s reasons for making the order, which invites a limited challenge addressing the exercise of discretion, the plaintiff has filed a de novo challenge under s 179(1) of the Act. The Court must make its own decision.11 [27] Mr Coomer’s submissions relied almost exclusively on maintaining he was the successful party and, therefore, no proper basis existed to eith...

6. Henric Eden v Complaints Assessment Committee 413, Dean Abraham & Angela Sanson [2017] NZREADT 53 [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...submissions: (a) That there was no mechanism under the Privacy Act for this Tribunal to grant leave for the evidence to be adduced; (b) Further, there is no jurisdiction for the Tribunal to obtain another party’s insurance details and details of their file; and 4 (c) It wasn’t relevant to the question of whether or not Mr Abraham and Ms Sanson had disclosed the information to the Appellants. [12] Accordingly, the Tribunal did not grant the request. Evidence [13] Duri...

7. Stowers v Short -Tumu Kaituna 14 (2021) 251 Waiariki MB 144 (251 WAR 144) [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...decision-making for the trust. [3] Although there was an earlier application before the Court in relation to this matter, this has since been superseded by the current application. This application was dated 13 December 2020 and leave was sought to file the amended application. [4] On 16 December 2020, after hearing from the parties, pursuant to rule 6.9 of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011, I adjourned this matter to Chambers for a Reserved Decision.1 Te Ture - The Law [5] Sect...

8. [2021] NZEnvC 054 Nga Kaitiaki O Te Awa O Ngaruroro [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...coverage should apply: • the standard conditions • the standard conditions as modified or expanded or both [Give details on separate sheet] 6. [To be completed only if this application has been lodged out of time.] This application was not filed in accordance with guideline 6(2) because (reasons) This application, although filed out of time, should nonetheless be granted because Applicant information: Applicant's name Solicitors Name of responsible person Business...

9. PSPLA - Form B: Application for an individual licence [pdf, 642 KB]

   ...to the Authority. • You can also print and fill in this form by hand. Use a black pen or blue pen, and print clearly IN CAPITALS. • Answer every question on the form unless the instructions tell you otherwise. Payment information The fee for filing an application for; • A certificate of approval is $800 • Temporary certificate of approval is an additional $27 To confirm how you pay the application fee, visit our website: https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/licences- cert...

10. LCRO 166/2014 RD v TS (4 August 2017) [pdf, 145 KB]

    ...reached with the Police whereby the charges were withdrawn on 11 June 2013.1 [7] Mr RD did not return the DVD and when requested to do so by the Police on 7 August 2013 he replied: Sorry i have not got it it went in the rubbish with most of the file my client wanted to see it but he did not you should have asked me weeks ago [8] The matter was followed up by Detective Senior Sergeant TS, the officer in charge of the District Child Protection team who asked for “assurances that it...