Search Results

1. LCRO 136/2017 RAI and SEM v EYR, IPA and DYN (26 November 2018) [pdf, 333 KB]

   ...the time Ms RAI appeared passionate. Ms RAI says that at least initially she thought Ms JOP would also agree to relocate to [City 1]. Although there was some initial uncertainty about whether Ms JOP was a guardian of J in fact and law, Ms DYN’s file note of 21 January 2014 includes a note of Ms RAI’s instruction that she was J’s main parent, so by inference, not J’s only parent. [9] Ms RAI’s view that she was J’s main parent coloured much of what followed. [10] Ms DYN...

2. Family Court applications June 2020 [xlsx, 188 KB]

   ...through the court process. Therefore, this data may differ to data reported elsewhere with a different extraction date. These tables were extracted on 31 August 2020. Contents: Table 1a: Number and percentage of substantive Family Court applications filed, by case type, 2010/2011 - 2019/2020 Table 1b: Number and percentage of substantive Family Court applications filed, by case type and application outcome, 2010/2011 - 2019/2020 Table 1c: Number of substantive Family Court applications fi...

3. Family Court applications December 2019 [xlsx, 229 KB]

   ...through the court process. Therefore, this data may differ to data reported elsewhere with a different extraction date. These tables were extracted on 9 March 2020. Contents: Table 1a: Number and percentage of substantive Family Court applications filed, by case type, 2010 - 2019 Table 1b: Number and percentage of substantive Family Court applications filed, by case type and application outcome, 2010 - 2019 Table 1c: Number of substantive Family Court applications filed, by case type and...

4. Mihaka v Housing New Zealand Corporation (Dismissal) [2017] NZHRRT 29 [pdf, 278 KB]

   ...reasons for granting that application. 1 [This decision is to be cited as: Mihaka v Housing New Zealand Corporation (Dismissal) [2017] NZHRRT 29.] 2 [2] The statement of claim was filed on 30 November 2015. A reply by HNZC followed on 23 December 2015. Since that time every effort to hear and determine the case has been thwarted, sometimes by Mr Mihaka and sometimes by circumstances. Some fourteen case management Minut...

5. LCRO 261/2016 TJ v DM and ZP (26 September 2019) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...pages. [14] The lawyers responded to the complaint on 17 May 2015. [15] On 18 April 2016, the Complaints Service wrote to the parties advising that the Standards Committee had considered the submissions filed, had reviewed the practitioner’s files, and had reached a preliminary view that the fees charged were appropriate and that there was no substance to the various conduct complaints. In that correspondence, the Committee identified the specific grounds of complaint that it h...

6. LCRO 145/2023 ET v PU (25 February 2025) [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...the affairs of another.2 [10] Ms PU did not forward a copy of the Police letter to Mr ET when she received it. [11] Mr ET and Ms PU met at her offices on 3 May 2017, to discuss progress of the family proceedings. At that stage they had not been filed in the Family Court. [12] The meeting was tense. At times Mr ET became angry. After an hour-and-a- half, Mr ET left. He did not tell Ms PU why he was leaving, where he was going or whether he would be returning. He took his USB stick...

7. [2010] NZEmpC 6 Ora Ltd v Kirkley [pdf, 44 KB]

   ...determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to amend pleadings BETWEEN ORA LTD Plaintiff AND SONJA KIRKLEY Defendant Hearing: By submissions filed on 6, 22 and 30 October, 19 November 4, 9 and 11 December 2009 Judgment: 25 January 2010 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS [1] In my judgment of 4 September 2009 I made the following directions at the conclusio...

8. Recording Industry Association of New Zealand v Teleom NZ 2592 [2013] NZCOP 1 [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...holder on behalf of the rights owner. [2] Because this is one of the first times the Tribunal has considered this legislation, this decision is slightly more detailed than perhaps will be necessary in future. (For the same reason, the Applicant filed comprehensive submissions in support of its application, which have been of assistance.) That said, however, the file sharing legislation is intended to provide a relatively quick, simple and inexpensive method of dealing with alleged in...

9. Henare v Maori Trustee - Parengarenga 3G [2012] Māori Appellate Court MB 1 (2012 APPEAL 1) [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...to remove the Māori Trustee and to appoint Stephen Henare, Margaret Dixon, Allan Palmer, Darryn Henry, Ria Slade, Stephanie Henry, and Irihapiti Martin as responsible trustees. [9] On the 24 th of July 2009, the second respondent (Mr Wiki) filed an application for a rehearing. [10] That application was heard by Judge Ambler on the 18 th and 19 th of November 2009 and resulted in Judge Ambler granting a rehearing. 4 It is from this decision of Judge Ambler’s (the Nov...

10. [2018] NZEnvC 028 McIntyre v Canterbury Regional Council [pdf, 2.9 MB]

    ...Mackenzie Guardians Incorporated; and (b) $37,000 to Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Incorporated. B: Under section 286 of the Resource Management Act 1991 , the District Court at Timaru is named as the Court this order may be filed in for enforcement purposes (if necessary). MciNTYRE & Anor v CRC - Cosls I ntrod uction 2 REASONS [1] This decision concerns two applications for costs made by Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zeala...