Search Results

1. ENVC Matiatia minute of the court 20141001 [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...instruments". I directed that all major parties are to present a "statement of issues" that they have agreed are in contention in the case. And may if they wish list those 2 [5] All remaining parties then have the opportunity to file and serve statements noting any issues they feel the major pat1ies may have left out. The issues must be relevant and must have been raised by the application and their submission. Any statements must be succinct and within jurisdiction...

2. AFB v ZUU [2013] NZDT 214 (26 June 2013) [pdf, 80 KB]

   ...The bite occurred as a result of a spontaneous dog fight, arising when AFB’s dog was on a leash and ZUU’s dog was not. AFB’s dog was bleeding profusely from the bite and was taken to the nearest vet for urgent treatment. [2] AFB has filed this claim for $691.50, which is the cost of the vet’s bills, as she considers ZUU liable to reimburse her for those costs. AFB did not attend the hearing of this claim. Issues [3] The issues I am required to determine are...

3. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Reid [2016] NZLCDT 2 [pdf, 33 KB]

   ...seeks for Mr Reid’s interim suspension from practice as a barrister and solicitor pursuant to s 245(1) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006. The practitioner, as I have indicated, faces three charges and those charges only had just been filed with the Tribunal yesterday and this hearing convened on an urgent basis. [2] Mr Reid has been most cooperative and, at short notice, appeared on his own behalf. In relation to the application, he has indicated to the Tribunal that he...

4. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee v McFarlane [2015] NZLCDT 17 [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...employed again. [10] The respondent’s conduct leads to the conclusion that she pay the applicant’s costs and refund to the applicant the costs of the Tribunal. She is a serving prisoner; is said to have no assets; and is seeking assistance to file for bankruptcy. None the less the Tribunal finds that the orders in respect of costs and refund should be made. It will then remain for the applicant to seek to recover some costs from her in the future. [11] The orders of the Tri...

5. EG and EH v AKSC1 LCRO 163 / 2011 and 164 / 2011 (11 November 2011) [pdf, 16 KB]

   ...matters. [7] They had understood that the content of that letter comprised the issues under the consideration of the Standards Committee. They responded accordingly. [8] I was informed that neither of the Practitioners had been sent a copy of the file of information provided to the NZLS by the LASA. [9] Following the review hearing, a written enquiry was made with the Auckland Standards Committee 1 seeking clarification about the documentation that had been sent to the Practi...

6. Nikau v Rongomau - Whangape Parish Lot 23B Horahora Marae [2013] Māori Appellate Court MB 1 (2013 APPEAL 1) [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...otherwise not addressed or opposed Ms Hall’s application. Respondent’s submissions [2] Ms Hall seeks an award of 80-90 per cent of actual costs incurred by the respondent. The actual costs incurred amount to $4,600.00 (GST inclusive). Ms Hall filed detailed submissions in support of her application. She set out the well understood principles on costs in this Court and the lower Court – we need not repeat those principles here. She pointed to the appellant’s aggravating...

7. Overview Trustee Ltd as trustee of the Carrigafoyle Trust v Cook & Anor as trustees of the CC Trust [2011] NZWHT Auckland 19 [pdf, 66 KB]

   SUMMARY Case: Overview Trustee Limited as Trustee of the Carrigafoyle Trust v Cook & Anor as trustees of the CC Trust File No: TRI-2008-100-000023/DBH 05619 Citation: [2011] NZWHT Auckland 19 Adjudicator: R Pitchforth Date of Decision: 25 March 2011 Background Overview Trustee Limited brought a claim regarding their home which they purchased that developed weathertightness issues. Eight respondents were joined during the course of proceedings, but after removal of s...

8. Malik v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 7 [pdf, 73 KB]

   SUMMARY Case: Malik v Auckland Council File No: TRI-2010-100-000004/DBH 05561 Citation: [2011] NZWHT Auckland 07 Adjudicator: K D Kilgour Date of Decision: 25 January 2011 Background The claimants brought a claim regarding their home which they purchased in 2006. They sought full remedial costs from the four remaining respondents to the claim: The first respondent: Auckland City Council, the territorial authority. The sixth respondent: Jin Bin Qui. Facts Octo...

9. Aldridge & Ors as Trustees of the SL & KM Aldridge Family Trust v Boe [2010] NZWHT Auckland 31 [pdf, 51 KB]

   SUMMARY Case: Aldridge & Ors as Trustees of the SL & KM Aldridge Family Trust v Boe File No: TRI-2009-100-000067 Citation: [2010] NZWHT Auckland Adjudicator: KD Kilgour Date of Decision: 12 November 2010 Background The claimants brought a claim regarding their home which they purchased in 2006. They sought full remedial costs from the four remaining respondents to the claim: First respondents: Mr and Mrs Boe, previous owners Second respondent: Hamilton City...

10. Hala 17 November 2016 NZSHD 5 [pdf, 76 KB]

    ...considers Mr Hala has changed since his convictions and said he has seen no indication of the character traits that resulted in Mr Hala’s offending. He also notes that Mr Hala will be working under close supervision. [4] With every objection filed by the Police the question for the Authority is whether the applicant is a fit and property person to hold a certificate.1 [5] In making this decision my primary consideration must be the purpose of the Act as set out in s 3 of the Act...