Search Results

1. Compulsory Treatment Orders

   The Mental Health (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act 1992 was amended on 29 October 2023. A Compulsory Treatment Order (CTO) is when a court orders that a person with a mental health disorder must receive treatment for up to 6 months. The person may not need to stay in hospital for the treatment. Community Treatment Order If the person is under a Community Treatment Order, they receive treatment in their own home or at some other place stated in the Order. Inpatient Order If a per

   Located in:

   1. Family >
   2. Court ordered treatment >
   3. Mental health treatment

2. Types of trials

   There are 2 types of trials: judge-alone trials jury trials. Check your summons or with court staff to identify the category of the crime (the offence) you’ve been charged with. Category 1 or 2 crimes: For less serious crimes, you have no option other than a judge-alone trial. Depending on the nature of the crime (offence), your case will be heard by either by a judge, justice of the peace or community magistrate. There will be no jury. Category 3 crimes: For category 3 crimes (offence

   Located in:

   1. Courts >
   2. Criminal >
   3. Charged with a crime

3. Biography

   ...victims and advise the Government as to what is needed – to provide a voice for those who struggle to be heard, but who must be heard, as they traverse a road no one ever expects to take, as victim/survivors of crime. In February 2025, Ruth was profiled in this 'The Post' article: https://www.thepost.co.nz/nz-news/360576491/entrepreneur-advocate-government-adviser-victims

   Located in:

   1. Chief Victims Advisor

4. Protocol as to Environment Court Judgment delivery expectations

   Protocol as to Environment Court Judgment delivery expectations Environment Court protocol as to judgment delivery expectations. All divisions of the Environment Court aim to deliver decisions as promptly as possible as required by section 272(1) RMA. Delayed judgments report The Chief Environment Court Judge is required periodically to publish information about the number of judgments considered to be outstanding beyond a reasonable time for delivery, in accordance with s288A Resource Managemen

   Located in:

   1. Environment Court >
   2. Decisions & publications

5. [2006] NZEmpC AC 47/06 Cliff & Groom v Air NZ Ltd [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...distressed at this new allegation that he effectively closed down for the rest of the investigation. However, by 15 November 2004 Mr Motet told Ms Roberts to disregard that information because it belonged to another person and had been incorrectly filed as relating to Mr Cliff. [61] On 12 November Mr Waite wrote to Mr Cliff to record where the investigation was up to. The letter said that documentation provided to Mr Cliff showed a total Internet usage of 81 hours 28 minutes of no...

6. ENVC Matiatia party corresp WMLFeb15 affidavit M Dunn [pdf, 17 MB]

   ...have reviewed the certificates of titles for the three properties to see if there are any memorials on them which could affect their use for parking by WML in the manner outlined by Messrs Mitchell and Wardale. I have reviewed the Council property files for the properties and identified the resource consents in place for the most recently established parking facilities on them. Along with Messrs Mitchell and Wardale I have also examined the terms and conditions of these consents a...

7. Smith v Waitakere City Council [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...(Mr Alexander is a Building Surveyor and principal of Alexander & Co, Building Surveyors and Dispute Resolution Consultants) • Mr Ewan Higham (Mr Higham is the Team Leader – building Control for Franklin District Council) Mr Higham filed a witness statement but was not required to attend the hearing for cross- examination. [39] The witnesses (who all gave sworn evidence) to defend the claim for the Second respondent, Mr Terence Quinn, and the Fourth Respondent, the...

8. ENVC Matiatia party correspondence - WML Feb15 - affidavit M Dunn [pdf, 17 MB]

   ...have reviewed the certificates of titles for the three properties to see if there are any memorials on them which could affect their use for parking by WML in the manner outlined by Messrs Mitchell and Wardale. I have reviewed the Council property files for the properties and identified the resource consents in place for the most recently established parking facilities on them. Along with Messrs Mitchell and Wardale I have also examined the terms and conditions of these consents a...

9. [2018] NZEnvC 116 Kumeu Property Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 8 MB]

   ...Hartley and M Matich for Auckland Council Date of Decision: 24 July 2018 Date of Issue: 2 {if J U L 20n.~ FINAL DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT A: Conditions of consent are confirmed as attached as A. B: No application for costs having been filed within the terms of the Court's decision, there is no order as to costs. Kumeu Property Limited v Auckland Council 2 REASONS Introduction [1] By decision [2018] NZEnvC 27, the Court determined that the grant of a consent...

10. [2022] NZEmpC 5 VMR v Civil Aviation Authority [pdf, 519 KB]

    ...amended Order was an issue for the High Court to consider on an application for judicial review. Second, the Act required claims to be commenced in the Employment Relations Authority and not the Court. [92] On 25 August 2021, proceedings were filed in the Authority on behalf of the plaintiffs raising an employment relationship problem. The notices of termination 14 “Employees” v Attorney-General [2021] NZEmpC 141. were served on each plaintiff the next day, in whic...