Search Results

1. Kereopa - Tumu Kaituna 7B (2003) 276 Rotorua MB 78 (276 ROT 78) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...24 September 2003 A19990007628 Tumu Kaituna 78 - Partition DECISION Minute Book: 276 ROT 78 On the 21 st March 2003 I issued a Preliminary Determination. I indicated that the final orders would not be finalised until a valuation report was filed with the Court. At a hearing of the Court today the valuation report was tendered. The Preliminary Determination is now confirmed. Today, the Court heard additional submissions from the applicants represented by Te Ohu Wikingi, Mr Te...

2. Tukaki - Matakana 1B2D2 (2003) 73 Tauranga MB 207 (73 T 207) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...November 2002 RESERVED DECISION Minute Book: 73 T 207 The land at issue here is a block of new freehold land on Matakana Island. There are 141 owners in this block and it is administered as a Ahu Whenua Trust. This application for partition was filed by Wiki Tukaki of Tauranga and was first heard by the Court on 14 November 2000 at 65 Tauranga 204-212 and 25 October 2001 at 67 Tauranga 195 where it was adjourned to allow for a further meeting with the owners. It then came before t...

3. Watson v Heitia - Ohinepuhiawe 140E Part Māori Reservation (2002) 109 Aotea MB 233 (109 AOT 233) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...recommendation. Pono is there. A majority support him remaining there. The creation of a rese'rve will not detract from the efficient use and operation of the land. . I now make the recommendation that an area of 56 square metres as shown on the plan on file, be set aside as a burial site for the descendants of Parewahawaha and Rangipumamau. Promulgated at Rotorua this /5' -H. day oy-'f ~~~~2002-., ... ,

4. [2021] NZEnvC 031 Wairoa District Council v Hawke's Bay Regional Council [pdf, 285 KB]

   ...the opportunity to discuss how further discharges can be avoided or, at the very least minimised pending finalisation of the current application for resource consent. [9] I do not consider there is any need to hear from W!DC or HBRC documents filed are relevant circumstances. [10] I will accordingly grant the stay of abatement notice until 12:00pm Monday, 5 April 2021. I reserve to both parties the right to apply for reconsideration of the stay should circumstances change. 4...

5. Finlay v Baker [pdf, 54 KB]

   SUMMARY Case: Finlay & Anor v Baker & Ors – PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 4 File No: TRI 2009-101-000014/ DBH 04646 Court: WHT Adjudicator: R Pitchforth Date of Decision: 3 September 2009 Background This Procedural Order deals with the removals and joinders of certain parties. In particular, the Tribunal deals with issues surrounding a claimant claiming for the leaks against one of the subcontractors (a labour-only builder). The claimant however is a builder and he and...

6. BORA Taxation (Annual Rates for 2017–18, Employment and Investment Income, and Remedial Matters) Bill [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...other pieces of legislation. 5. The main objectives of the Bill are to modernise and improve the settings for the administration of the tax system through a series of measures relating to employment and investment income information, the electronic filing threshold for goods and services tax (‘GST’), amendments to the pay as you earn (‘PAYE’) rules, and amendments to penalty and interest rules. 6. The Bill also contains proposals aimed at improving current tax settings within a...

7. [2018] NZEnvC 188 Permanent Forest v Gisborne District Council [pdf, 457 KB]

   ...granted is reasonable and appropriate in terms of the interests of the environment, the community and the parties. Therefore, stays are granted to PFL on the following conditions: (a) the applicants are to confer with the respondent and ensure the filing of a memorandum of counsel (preferably jointly with the respondent) reporting on progress, by Friday 2 November 2018; (b) the applicants are to ensure counsel is available at short notice for a teleconference to be arranged for sh...

8. [2019] NZEnvC 064 Save our Hills Upper Hutt Inc v Upper Hutt City Council [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...expeli witness conference. He is, as I understand, an architect by profession and is not professing any expertise in the area of hydrological engineering or other related issues. [3] On two occasions, Judge Dwyer who has been the Judge managing the file, has responded to those requests saying very clearly that he saw no reason to depart from the usual protocol of expert witness conferencing and that Mr Pattinson should not attend, but of course the engineers coming from the parties...

9. [2019] NZEnvC 106 Banora v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...Preparation of Plans for the management of the work required; (b) Removal of debris and structures; (c) Stabilise and remediate the land where earthworks have been undertaken;and (d) Restore the vegetation. [3] On 21 December 2018 the Sanoras filed an application to vary these orders. [4] The parties have since engaged in discussions and have reached an agreement on the works to be completed to remediate the site. The details of the agreement reached are summarised below: (a)...

10. [2020] NZEmpC 228 Ashby v NIWA Vessel Management Ltd [pdf, 173 KB]

    ...INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE J C HOLDEN (Application for security for costs and application for stay of proceedings) [1] Although Ms Ashby was successful in the Employment Relations Authority and awarded lost wages and compensation, she has filed a non-de novo challenge seeking to increase the remedies awarded.1 [2] NIWA Vessel Management Limited (NIWA) now applies for security for costs and for a stay of proceedings until security for costs are paid. NIWA contends that the...