Search Results

1. LCRO 170/2019 ZY v LN QC (23 April 2021) [pdf, 279 KB]

   ...he considered to Ms ZY’s latest “outburst”, he felt that he had no option but to 19 Webb, Dalziel and Cook, above n 6 at [5.8.3]. 23 terminate his brief. He concludes with request to Ms TW to advise what is to be done with Ms ZY’s files. [142] There had been earlier problems in the relationship when Ms ZY had, on receipt of [redacted]’s decision, made accusation that Mr LN had been negligent. The problems were smoothed over, but on receipt of Ms ZY’s email of 14...

2. [2007] NZEmpC AC 48/07 Axiom Rolle PRP Valuations Services Ltd v Kapadia [pdf, 47 KB]

   ...IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 48/07 ARC 76/05 IN THE MATTER OF point of law determination BETWEEN RAHUL RAMESH KAPADIA Plaintiff AND AXIOM ROLLE PRP VALUATIONS SERVICES LTD Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on 2 and 4 May 2007 Judgment: 15 August 2007 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 2) OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS [1] This judgment deals with the issue of whether a plaintiff can withdraw the withdrawal of a challenge. [2] The plaintiff,...

3. [2012] NZEmpC 216 Q v W [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...the plaintiff stated: [36] [Q] is seeking name suppression for all past and present employment matters, which she has previously raised with the Court. [3] There was no indication that this matter had been raised in any prior memoranda filed by the plaintiff and was not addressed by Q in the chambers conference held on Wednesday 9 December 2009. I advised that if Q wished to pursue the matter of name suppression she would need to file a formal application supported by affid...

4. O v J [2016] NZIACDT 17 (30 March 2016) [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...[6.5] Mr J engaged in dishonest or misleading behaviour, which is a ground of complaint pursuant to section 44 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 (the Act). The circumstances were: [6.5.1] The Registrar required Mr J to provide his file, using the statutory process under section 57 of the Act. [6.5.2] Mr J’s response to the request was to say the complainant was never his client, and accordingly he had no records, and had not given any immigration advice. [6.5.3] Howe...

5. Hood v American Express International (NZ) Inc (Discovery) [2015] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 61 KB]

   ...better discovery. The application is opposed by American Express International (NZ) Inc (AMEX). A brief chronology [2] A brief chronology will aid an understanding of the issues raised by the application. According to the statement of reply filed by AMEX the general timeframe is that: 1 [This decision is to be cited as: Hood v American Express International (NZ) Inc (Discovery) [2015] NZHRRT 1] 2 [2.1] Between approx...

6. Phon & Anor v Waitakere City Council [pdf, 82 KB]

   ...consent were not contributing factors to the dwelling leaking, the claimants was likely to withdraw their claim against the Council and the designer. This concession was recorded in Procedural Order No 1. 8. The claimants subsequently filed their expert’s report. Their expert records six key areas or defects which have caused leaks. These are: Inadequate installation of the cladding system. Insufficiently waterproofed horizontal surfaces of the balustrade walls....

7. Dewes - Marangairoa B44 (2003) 65 Ruatōria MB 43 (65 RUA 43) [pdf, 552 KB]

   ...Subject: Marangairoa B44 - Occupation Order Section: 328/93 PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION This application concerns a small family that has for many years been displaced from their broader whanau and hapu and their associated lands. The application was filed by \tValter Dewes, the nephew of the executors (trustees) of the will of his deceased . grandfather and grandmother. One of the trustees Mr Kapunga (Koro) Matemoana Dewes is also the current lessee of the block. He provided condition...

8. LCRO 164/2018 VG v SQ (2 June 2020) [pdf, 132 KB]

   ...maintenance and had not acted on Mr VG’s instructions to pursue recovery of overpayment of child support. [6] Mr VG asserted he had circumstantial evidence that supported “his version” of what had happened but because he was unable to see Mr SQ’s file,2 he could provide nothing more. The Standards Committee determination [7] The Standards Committee traversed in some detail, the matters in respect of which Mr VG had instructed Mr SQ. [8] Mr SQ commenced acting for Mr VG w...

9. [2020] NZEmpC 117 Johnston v The Fletcher Construction Company Ltd [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...made because the firm is conducting an investigation into possible claims against Fletcher Group Ltd on behalf of some shareholders. Fletcher Construction is part of Fletcher Group. [5] Mayweathers anticipates that documents on the Court’s files may contain information important to its investigation because Mr Johnston was Fletcher Construction’s Financial Controller. Mayweathers understands that an aspect of the claim was about allegations as to the handling of financial inf...

10. Waitangi Tribunal COVID-19 Level 4 Protocol (17 August 2021) [pdf, 127 KB]

    ...hearings and other events will be rescheduled once we have ceased to be at Level 4. 4. If there is any application filed with the Tribunal seeking urgent action during this period, it is to be directed to me to address. 5. In terms of any filing with the Waitangi Tribunal during this period, the following rules shall apply: • During the continuation of the Level 4 alert all filing of documents with the Tribunal is to be electronic. If a party does not have the ability to file...