Search Results

1. CN v XN 2015 NZDT 833 (22 September 2015) [pdf, 67 KB]

   ...he was delivered to her property in November 2014. CN is very unhappy with BB. She believes that she was not informed of all of BB’s complications, that he has behavioural problems, is unsafe and was misrepresented by XN. [2] In July 2015 CN filed a claim in the Tribunal for $6,000 from XN. Issue [3] The issue is whether BB was misrepresented. [4] This is a contractual dispute. The Contractual Remedies Act 1979 applies. The Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 and the protection it affo...

2. [2018] NZEmpC 5 Read v Trends Publishing International Ltd [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...an application for a stay of execution AND IN THE MATTER of an application for security for costs BETWEEN BEVAN READ Plaintiff AND TRENDS PUBLISHING INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Defendant Hearing: (on the papers filed on 3 and 26 January and 7 February 2018) Appearances: H White, counsel for plaintiff K Johnson, agent for defendant Judgment: 15 February 2018 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL APPLICATIONS FOR ST...

3. External Sector Feedback Document Audit and Monitoring Policy [pdf, 393 KB]

   ...NZLS response 10. The NZLS noted that further clarification was needed on how the baseline data is calculated. The NZLS considered it was important that ‘like for like’ measures are used, rather than simply taking the average over a number of files. This should include using the same practice area and type of case. Our response 11. The feedback received raised the issue of fairness in the application of the new metrics, and ensuring that efficient, or diligent providers were not...

4. Strathmore Park Progressive April 2018 Judicial Conference Speech Note [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...Limited (ENV-2016-WLG-00058) Your Honour, My name is Glenn Kingston representing the Strathmore Park Progressive and Beautification Association for which I currently hold the position of SecretarylTreasurer. 1. In March our Association resolved to file a minute to the Court to summarise our concerns regarding the proposed further delay to the Application process. My comments today are based on the minute dated 15th March 2018 & provides examples to support our view. 2. Regardl...

5. Hawke’s Bay Standards Committee v Dobson [2017] NZLCDT 19 [pdf, 132 KB]

   ...11(a) and 241(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (the Act). Ms Dobson has admitted this charge and fully cooperated with the process. [2] The parties agreed that the matter could be properly dealt with on the papers. Ms Dobson has filed an affidavit setting out her circumstances and the context of the offending. In that she says she expresses her remorse for the breach of trust and acknowledges that “all the evidence presented in support of the charge against me is c...

6. [2018] NZEnvC 114 NZ Heavy Haulage v South Taranaki District Council [pdf, 616 KB]

   ...the Court recorded in its decision that it has reached the same decision as the Council and for essentially the same reasons. [8] The Council also argues that the Association put the Council to additional costs in reviewing and responding to late-filed evidence. While that is so, the evidence was lodged with the agreement of the Court and we would not regard that as being a significant factor on its own. [9] The Council advises that it was put to a total cost of $102,538.78 for lega...

7. Beef+Lamb New Zealand Limited.pdf [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...agrees to participate in mediation or other alternative dispute resolution of the proceedings. CP Thomsen Counsel for s 274 party Beef+Lamb New Zealand Ltd 29 September 2020 CPT-504273-6-66-V4 This notice was filed by CHRISTOPHER PAUL THOMSEN, solicitor for the party of the firm Fletcher Vautier Moore. The address for service of the above- named party is at the offices of Fletcher Vautier Moore, Solicitors, 265A Queen Street, Richmond, Nelson....

8. Waikato-River-Authority.pdf [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...PPC1 on 21 May 2018. WRA made a further submission on 17 September 2018. WRA presented evidence to the Independent Hearing Commissioners on a range of matters raised in its submission(s) on 13 March 2019. BF\60563877\1 Page 3 6. WRA has filed its own appeal that identifies provisions in the Decisions Version that do not give effect to Te Ture Whaimana, but otherwise is supportive of the Decisions Version as notified.3 7. WRA is interested in all of the proceedings, in partic...

9. Waikato-River-Authority.pdf [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...PPC1 on 21 May 2018. WRA made a further submission on 17 September 2018. WRA presented evidence to the Independent Hearing Commissioners on a range of matters raised in its submission(s) on 13 March 2019. BF\60567462\1 Page 3 6. WRA has filed its own appeal that identifies provisions in the Decisions Version that do not give effect to Te Ture Whaimana, but otherwise is supportive of the Decisions Version as notified.3 7. WRA is interested in all of the proceedings, in partic...

10. Waikato River Authority.pdf [pdf, 162 KB]

    ...PPC1 on 21 May 2018. WRA made a further submission on 17 September 2018. WRA presented evidence to the Independent Hearing Commissioners on a range of matters raised in its submission(s) on 13 March 2019. BF\60538430\1 Page 3 6. WRA has filed its own appeal that identifies provisions in the Decisions Version that do not give effect to Te Ture Whaimana, but otherwise is supportive of the Decisions Version as notified.3 7. WRA is interested in all of the proceedings, in partic...