Search Results

Search results for Filing.

18499 items matching your search terms

  1. Waikato River Authority.pdf [pdf, 161 KB]

    ...PPC1 on 21 May 2018. WRA made a further submission on 17 September 2018. WRA presented evidence to the Independent Hearing Commissioners on a range of matters raised in its submission(s) on 13 March 2019. BF\60536253\1 Page 3 6. WRA has filed its own appeal that identifies provisions in the Decisions Version that do not give effect to Te Ture Whaimana, but otherwise is supportive of the Decisions Version as notified.3 7. WRA is interested in all of the proceedings, in partic...

  2. Waikato River Authority.pdf [pdf, 161 KB]

    ...PPC1 on 21 May 2018. WRA made a further submission on 17 September 2018. WRA presented evidence to the Independent Hearing Commissioners on a range of matters raised in its submission(s) on 13 March 2019. BF\60539450\1 Page 3 6. WRA has filed its own appeal that identifies provisions in the Decisions Version that do not give effect to Te Ture Whaimana, but otherwise is supportive of the Decisions Version as notified.3 7. WRA is interested in all of the proceedings, in partic...

  3. Matamata-Piako District Council.pdf [pdf, 103 KB]

    ...the 29th day of September 2020 MATAMATA-PIAKO DISTRICT COUNCIL by its lawyers and duly authorised agents BROOKFIELDS LAWYERS A M B Green / B J Cochrane Counsel for Matamata-Piako District Council This section 274 is filed by Andrew Michael Basford Green, solicitor for Matamata- Piako District Council. The address for service of Matamata-Piako District Council is at the offices of Brookfields Lawyers, Tower 1, 9th Floor, 205 Queen Street, Auckland....

  4. Waikato River Authority.pdf [pdf, 162 KB]

    ...PPC1 on 21 May 2018. WRA made a further submission on 17 September 2018. WRA presented evidence to the Independent Hearing Commissioners on a range of matters raised in its submission(s) on 13 March 2019. BF\60539593\1 Page 3 6. WRA has filed its own appeal that identifies provisions in the Decisions Version that do not give effect to Te Ture Whaimana, but otherwise is supportive of the Decisions Version as notified.3 7. WRA is interested in all of the proceedings, in partic...

  5. Waikato-River-Authority.pdf [pdf, 161 KB]

    ...PPC1 on 21 May 2018. WRA made a further submission on 17 September 2018. WRA presented evidence to the Independent Hearing Commissioners on a range of matters raised in its submission(s) on 13 March 2019. BF\60558802\1 Page 3 6. WRA has filed its own appeal that identifies provisions in the Decisions Version that do not give effect to Te Ture Whaimana, but otherwise is supportive of the Decisions Version as notified.3 7. WRA is interested in all of the proceedings, in partic...

  6. Beef+Lamb New Zealand Limited.pdf [pdf, 114 KB]

    ...protecting the Awa. 7. B+LNZ agrees to participate in mediation or other alternative dispute resolution of the proceedings. CP Thomsen Counsel for s 274 party Beef+Lamb New Zealand Ltd 29 September 2020 4 This notice was filed by CHRISTOPHER PAUL THOMSEN, solicitor for the party of the firm Fletcher Vautier Moore. The address for service of the above- named party is at the offices of Fletcher Vautier Moore, Solicitors, 265A Queen Street, Richmond, Ne...

  7. Beef+Lamb New Zealand Limited.pdf [pdf, 114 KB]

    ...PC1. 7. B+LNZ agrees to participate in mediation or other alternative dispute resolution of the proceedings. CP Thomsen Counsel for s 274 party Beef+Lamb New Zealand Ltd 29 September 2020 4 This notice was filed by CHRISTOPHER PAUL THOMSEN, solicitor for the party of the firm Fletcher Vautier Moore. The address for service of the above- named party is at the offices of Fletcher Vautier Moore, Solicitors, 265A Queen Street, Richmond, Nelson. D...

  8. [2020] NZEmpC 157 Cowan v Kidd [pdf, 171 KB]

    ...payable after Mr Cowan received a legal aid grant should not exceed the amount paid for those legal services; and (b) no allowance should be made for second counsel. [6] Kidd Partnership also says there should be no uplift as: (a) Mr Cowan had filed a de novo challenge, so all matters were at issue; (b) GST should not be payable because Mr Cowan achieved a slightly lower order in regard to the amount of wages payable than he received in the Employment Relations Authority (the Aut...

  9. Eligibility Criteria Waikato [pdf, 167 KB]

    ...Defendant’s signature Date _______________ OFFICE USE ONLY The Eligibility Criteria must be completed for all referrals. The Eligibility Criteria and Consent Form must be kept on the case file if the defendant is offered a place in the AODT Court. Te Whare Whakapiki Wairua ki Kirikiriroa Waikato Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Court CONSENT FORM

  10. 29 June 2021 Ngai Taiwhakaea v Whakatane District Council [pdf, 130 KB]

    ...any other application or proceeding (apart from an interlocutory application). The scheduling fee is not refundable if the hearing is no longer required. The party bringing the proceeding is liable to pay hearing fees. Please note : As there is 3 files been heard together ,each appellant is liable for a third of the scheduling fee. $116.67 each. • For interlocutory applications, the first two days do not incur a fee. After the second day there will be a $350 fee for each half-day or p...