18507 items matching your search terms
...MATTER of proceedings removed AND IN THE MATTER of interlocutory applications BETWEEN PETER D'ARCY LORIGAN Plaintiff AND INFINITY AUTOMOTIVE LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 27 October 2017, and on documents filed on 2, 8, 10, 13, 20, 23 24 November, and 4, 5 December 2017 (heard at Auckland) Appearances: P Lorigan, in person R Towner and B Norrie, counsel for defendant Judgment: 6 December 2017 JUDGMENT OF JUDG...
...Alkazaz, who is representing himself in the proceeding, indicated that there were no outstanding interlocutory matters. Counsel for the defendants indicated that an application for security for costs was pending. Such an application has now been filed and will be dealt with in due course, once documents in answer and reply are received. [3] Following the allocation of a hearing date, Mr Alkazaz has now filed an application for stay of proceedings. This is really an application...
...MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 73 EMPC 24/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time to file a challenge BETWEEN E TŪ INCORPORATED Plaintiff AND NEW ZEALAND STEEL LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: G Pollak, counsel for plaintiff C Pearce, counsel for defendant...
...1 [This decision is to be cited as Greer v Corrections (Costs) [2022] NZHRRT 44.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2022] NZHRRT 44 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [2] On 5 January 2021 the Department of Corrections (Corrections) filed submissions seeking $8,840 in costs. Mr Greer provided no submissions on costs. THE APPLICATION FOR COSTS [3] Corrections has asked for an award of $8,840 in costs, noting however that the actual legal fees incurred were $26,519.60...
...received a parking ticket for unauthorised parking for an amount of $160.00. The applicant seeks a declaration of non-liability for an amount of $305.00 which includes the amount of the parking ticket, penalty charges for non-payment and the Tribunal’s filing fee. 2. At today’s hearing the representative for the respondent, HX, told the Tribunal that the applicant had not been charged a penalty fee as she had disputed the ticket. Therefore, the only amount she was liable to pay th...
...advising him that if he wished to have the matter settled he would need to sign the discharge form sent to him in February 2019 with the offer of settlement. ES responded on 28 April 2021 stating again that the offer is unacceptable, and he will be filing a claim in the Tribunal. 4. ES filed his claim on 19 February 2024. He claims the sum of $33,016.00 (but limiting his claim to the maximum of the Tribunal’s jurisdiction being $30,000.00) being the cost to repair the damaged silo...
...on 27 March 2018 and made no further rent payments to him. 7. EN filed his claim on 27 June 2024. He says he was unable to do so earlier because he had no contact details for OX, until their paths crossed again in May of this year. The date of filing of EN’s claim is legally significant because section 11 of the Limitation Act 2010 provides a defence to a claim for money if the claim is filed more than six years after the date the claim is based on. EN’s claim is clearly outside...
From time to time the Court decides cases that have general importance for practitioners of employment law as well as for the particular parties. These will include some judgments of the full Court and others examining and applying new law 2012 Faitala & Goff v Terranova Homes & Care Ltd [2012] NZEmpC 199 [Judgment of the Full Court, 27 November 2012] -Removal from the Authority. Case concerned questions of law on the employer's entitlement to deduct the employer's compulsory KiwiSa
...(e) Used threatening behaviour in communications with Mrs AQ and her mother Mrs DS. [7] The Standards Committee identified a number of areas where it considered that Mr UD could have managed the case better. It concluded that he should have filed an application for stay of the Family Court orders and attempted to obtain an urgent order before 19 February 2011. The Committee noted that he had filed submissions in relation to the admission of new evidence a day late and filed p...
...requirements of s 114 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act). [3] The Authority subsequently investigated Ms Shaw’s dismissal grievance and issued a determination on 7 December 2018.2 [4] On 4 January 2019, a statement of claim was filed in this Court, challenging the substantive determination of the Authority. A hearing de novo was sought. The statement of claim alleged there were two disadvantage grievances and a dismissal grievance. The first disadvantage grievanc...