Search Results

1. Walters - Horahora 1B4A2D1 (2011) 22 Taitokerau MB 209 (22 TTK 209) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...applications were before the Court, the four now under consideration and the fifth concerning a roadway on another part of the Horahora blocks. The remaining four applications set out in the entitulment above were adjourned for submissions to be filed in May 2008. [3] When later reviewing the files, I became concerned as to whether the roadway sought to be declared road was defined with ―sufficient particularity‖ for the purposes of s 320(3) Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 (...

2. Foot v Registrar of the REAA [2015] NZREADT 24 [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...be wrong and illegal and that the offending took place over a nine year period. At sentencing, His Honour also accepted that the applicant was generally remorseful about her offending. [20] The applicant emphasises that a number of persons have filed evidence briefs in her support regarding the present application to review the decision of the Registrar, and that she has been offered employment again with Leaders. Its managing director, Mr R G Garlick, has given evidence in her suppor...

3. NH v Singh LCRO 53/2013, 91/2013 and 115/2013 (27 August 2014) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...by default against Mr and Mrs NH and LMN Ltd, and judgment was sealed on 19 August 2009, (the New Zealand Judgment). QRS arranged for an agent in Australia to serve the New Zealand Judgment on Mr NH. [34] Shortly after he was served, Mr NH filed for voluntary bankruptcy in New Zealand, and was declared bankrupt on 3 September 2009. [35] QRS applied for the New Zealand Judgment to be registered in Australia, and later advised Mr NH it had sealed judgment against him in Austra...

4. 2011 to 2014 Ministry of Justice statement of intent [pdf, 537 KB]

   ...ensure sustainable court services throughout the greater Auckland region. The programme will improve how we use current resources to minimise investment in new facilities. The electronic operating model will replace paper court records and case files with electronic court records and case management for smarter, faster, more integrated service delivery. The audio-visual links project will install audio-visual conferencing technology so people can participate remotely in court...

5. Manning - Kirikiri Pawhaoa B2A1 [2011] Maori Appellate Court MB 215 (2011 APPEAL 215) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...for so doing. We now consider the particulars of this case before us. 2011 Maori Appellate Court MB 231 [77] The property is a relatively small (3755m 2 ) beachfront property at Bland Bay, south of the Bay of Islands. In the valuation filed with applications it is described as a holiday home. It was owned by the late Williena Manning and under her will the beneficiaries are her husband George Manning for a life interest; on his death the property is split into two halve...

6. Maori Land Court - Lot 300, Parish of Waioeka [2010] 2010 Maori Appellate Court MB 12 (2010 APPEAL 12) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...Native Land Court and Māori Land Court. It has been assumed to be Native or Māori freehold land. Procedural History [12] On 25 February 2007 as part of the Māori Freehold Land Registration Project, a Deputy Registrar of the Māori Land Court filed an application pursuant to s 131 of TTWMA, seeking to determine the status of the block. [13] The records of the Māori Land Court indicate that the matter was called before the Lower Court on 10 May 2007 and 4 July 2007. [14] On...

7. Robinson Family Trust v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 8 [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...joints trim defective.2 [23] Mr Wiemann said that to repair the townhouse it would need to be reclad with a drained and vented cavity, and areas of framing and roofing would need to be replaced. [24] The principal of Kaizon, Neil Alvey, filed an extensive brief of evidence which was reiterated and elaborated on at the hearing. Mr Wiemann agreed with Mr Alvey‟s findings stating that Mr Alvey had the benefit of greater invasive testing, was involved with the remediation a...

8. P Singh v Kumar [2011] NZIACDT 24 (18 August 2011) [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...submission was delivered to an unrelated party in the same building as the Tribunal’s Secretariat. That would not have been apparent to the Adviser. [12] The Tribunal set aside the decision. The Adviser had established he took appropriate steps to file the submissions, and reasonably believed the Tribunal had acknowledged receipt. http://www.iaa.govt.nz/ 3 [13] The Adviser’s submissions requested an oral hearing, and set out a response to the complaint. The Tribunal determi...

9. AD & Anor v ZU LCRO 60/2013 (3 March 2014) [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...Judge presided over their negotiations with the GQ did not result in any prejudice to the ADs. [26] Mr ZU says that he discussed the prospect of securing a High Court Judge for the settlement meeting with the GQ’ lawyer, and that they jointly filed a consent memorandum, but received no response from the court. The parties decided to proceed, and with the assistance of their lawyers, negotiated settlement terms. [27] The decision refers to emails between Mr ZU and the GQ’ la...

10. Eichelbaum v CAC 303 & White [2016] NZREADT 56 [pdf, 268 KB]

    ...determined by way of a judgment. Accordingly, the District Court proceeding and documents produced for the purposes of the proceeding are not of assistance in determining the present appeal. [10] Mr Eichelbaum’s complaint to the Authority was filed on 25 November 2011. He filed an amended complaint on 5 December 2011. The complaint contained three principal allegations: that Ms White had failed to disclose known defects in the property, had falsely advertised the age of the pr...