Search Results

1. The Registrar - Te Ahitainga No1 Sec 10 C (2018) 72 Tākitimu MB 255 (72 TKT 255) [pdf, 350 KB]

   ...The council declined that request. [29] Then or shortly thereafter, an application was made for review of the existing trust and that is the immediate background to these applications. When the application for review of trust was initially filed, the Court appointed Mr Bloor to work with the owners and trustees and to report to the Court. In 2015, during the course of the review proceedings, a new grazing lease was negotiated with Cameron Stewart for the 4D, 5A, 5B, 5C1 and 5C2 b...

2. [2018] NZEnvC 207 Sustainable Otakiri Incorporated v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 825 KB]

   ...terms of s 104(3)(d) RMA when the application for the district consents was limited notified and, Sustainable Otakiri says, because of the scale and extent of adverse effects it should have been publicly notified. [7] Sustainable Otakiri has filed an application for declarations from the Court in relation to the first of these jurisdictional matters. That application is presently being case-managed separately. [8] There are two other appeals against those parts of the original dec...

3. [2021] NZREADT 06 - Silcock (22 January 2021) [pdf, 309 KB]

   ...REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 1904) First Respondent AND MURRAY KYLE WATSON Second Respondent On the papers Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Chairperson Mr N O’Connor, Member Ms F Mathieson, Member Submissions filed by: Ms Silcock, Appellant Ms L Lim, on behalf of the Authority Mr J Waymouth, on behalf of Mr Watson Date of Decision: 22 January 2021 ____________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF THE...

4. CAC 403 v Tucker [2016] NZREADT 65 [pdf, 300 KB]

   ...Tucker pursued a dispute with another licensee, Mr J Wills, and/or Custom Residential Ltd (“the Agency”) in a manner that would reasonably be regarded by agents of good standing, or reasonable members of the public, as disgraceful. Mr Tucker filed a Response to this charge, in which he denies it. [2] On 11 May 2016 Complaints Assessment Committee 403 (“CAC 403”) laid a further charge of misconduct against Mr Tucker, under s 73(a) (disgraceful conduct) of the Act (“the s...

5. WISE - EiC - D MacTavish - Irrigation-Geohydrology (filed 9 Feb 2021) [pdf, 742 KB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI ROHE ENV-2020-CHC-127 UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 ("the Act") IN THE MATTER of the Water Permits Plan Change - Plan Change 7, being part of a proposal of national significance directed by the Minister for the Environment to be referred to the Environment Court under section 142(2)(b) of the RMA AND IN THE MATTER of an application under sec

6. [2020] NZSSAA 5 (28 April 2020) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...the oral evidence in the first hearing, that was essential for a fair hearing. Accordingly, the hearing was fully de novo, and the existing record of documentary material could be used or replaced as the parties considered appropriate. [5] XXXX filed a supplementary brief of evidence, which updated his circumstances and included his earlier evidence. He also filed a new brief of evidence from Mr Brown, who owns the home where XXXX lived for several years, when he was in New Zealan...

7. LCRO 116/2019 RLF v DN (29 January 2020) [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...complete a will ranging from “a simple change of mind to a lack of capacity”, and it was not the Committee’s role “to look behind” BG’s 2014 will for which probate had been granted by the High Court.8 Application for review [34] Mr LF filed an application for review on 7 August 2019. In following communications to this Office he provided (a) a chronology of events from 14 September 2007 (the date of Mrs LF’s will) until 17 July 2019 (the date of his lawyer’s final l...

8. [2021] NZEmpC 183 Stenhouse v Towman Towing Group Ltd [pdf, 303 KB]

   ...into her behaviour or Towman’s decision to dismiss her. The only evidence Towman could point to as a way of explaining its actions, and to contradict Ms Stenhouse, was Ms Pink’s letters. Copies of them were in the common bundle of documents filed by the parties but including them only established that they were what they purported to be; Towman’s correspondence with Ms Stenhouse and that was not in dispute. Ms Stenhouse was not questioned about them. [49] By themselves Towm...

9. [2021] NZIACDT 25 – RH v Ji (8 November 2021) [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...April 2019 to select single rather than partnership status on the visa application.1 [7] The visitor’s visa was approved by Immigration New Zealand (Immigration NZ) on 24 April 2019. 1 Complaint letter from the complainant (undated but filed with Authority on 18 August 2020) at 5–6 of the Registrar’s bundle. 3 [8] After the complainant’s arrival in New Zealand, she and Ms Z married on 12 June 2019. [9] A work visa application was made by the complainant in J...

10. [2023] NZREADT 7 - CAC 2002 v Sun (6 April 2023) [pdf, 309 KB]

    ...2 and 15 contained the same material particulars in the GST schedules before each version of the ASPs was signed, in breach of rr 5.1 and 9.9 of the Rules. [25] Ms Sun is defending the charge. THE EVIDENCE [26] Statements of Evidence were filed by the Committee and the following witnesses were called at the hearing before the Tribunal: (a) SE, the purchaser of Lot 3; (b) XZ, the purchaser of Lot 15; (c) BR, the director of PE Ltd; (d) BD, the branch manager at Barfoots To...