Search Results

1. AEB v ZVT Ltd [2011] NZDT 295 (30 May 2011) [pdf, 59 KB]

   ...bricks) advised ZVT Ltd that the second batch were not acceptable because they were visibly lighter than the first batch. ZVT Ltd attended the site and offered replacement bricks which, on 20 December, they delivered to AEB at no charge. [5] AEB filed a claim seeking the cost to plaster over the bricks ($11,509), as a solution for the difference in shades. At the hearing, AEB said this was not a viable option because of the building issues created by plastering. [6] ZVT Ltd ac...

2. CAC 10047 v Whiteford [2011] NZREADT 7 [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...was annoyed by this and as a result of what he described as the defendant’s dishonesty and his ill feeling for the defendant’s behaviour he cancelled the contract without paying the deposit. Evidence for the Defendant [12] The defendant filed a response to the charge pursuant to Regulation 7(i) of the Real Estate Agents (Complaints and Discipline) Regulations 2009 in which he denied the charge but offered the following explanation:- “I accept I did not advise the prosp...

3. Auckland District Law Society v Doyle [2009] NZLCDT 8 [pdf, 21 KB]

   ...sanction hearing and there has been no appearance by Ms Doyle except through written submissions provided by her lawyer Mr Scott whose attendance is excused. [4] The Society seeks an order finding that the charges are proved and in support has filed affidavit evidence setting out the Society’s evidence including the results of an investigation by Mr Mace which took place over a four month period between December 2007 and April 2008 and sets out quite clearly a spreadsheet suppo...

4. CAC 20004 v Li and Ors [2014] NZREADT 77 [pdf, 23 KB]

   ...Christopher Swann by the Complaints Assessment Committee 20004. We found that Messrs Li and Swann had engaged in unsatisfactory conduct, and that misconduct was proved against Ms Wang. 2 [2] On 1 September 2014 counsel for the defendants filed a memorandum seeking that judgment against the second defendant be recalled on two grounds namely: [a] That at paragraph [170] of the judgment reference is made to Ms Wang wilfully contravening the Act and its Regulations, when the amen...

5. [2014] NZEmpC 5 Nee Nee and Nathan v C3 Ltd costs [pdf, 57 KB]

   ...costs between them. This was conditional upon a payment being made on Monday 16 December 2013. If that payment was made then any judgment on costs would be unlikely to be required. [3] Insofar as Mr Nee Nee is concerned, Ms Muir and Ms Rendle filed an updated memorandum dated 29 November 2013. That reiterates the submissions contained in the first memorandum dated 1 October 2013 in respect of indemnity costs sought against Mr Nee Nee. The later memorandum also updates the quan...

6. Satnam Singh v Shane Singh and Scorpion Liquor (2006) Ltd (Setting Aside) [2015] NZHRRT 16 [pdf, 67 KB]

   ...exercised their right of appeal to the High Court but that appeal has been adjourned to allow application to be made to the Tribunal for the decision of 9 March 2015 to be set aside. The application to set aside [4] The application to set aside was filed on 12 May 2015 and is supported by an affidavit sworn by Raj Devi, the director and owner of Scorpion Liquor (2006) Ltd (Scorpion Liquor) and by an affirmation by her son, Shane Singh, who managed the business. The essential ground of...

7. Singh v Registrar of Immigration Advisers [2015] NZIACDT 65 (27 May 2015) [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...warrant any further investigation; at no point has there been evidence to support them. [23] Accordingly, I consider the Registrar reached the correct view on the material she considered. My reconsideration of that material, together with the material filed in the appeal leads to the same view. I do not consider the Tribunal should hear the complaint; it does not disclose statutory grounds for complaint. [24] I note the Registrar identified a potential irregularity with record keeping;...

8. ARLA - Form 6 Special licence application [docx, 19 KB]

   ...[describe] Dated at: [place, date] Signature of applicant: Notes 1 This form must be accompanied by the prescribed fee. 2 If required to do so by the secretary of the District Licensing Committee, the applicant must within 10 working days after filing this application with the committee ensure that notice of this application in form 8 is attached in a conspicuous place on or adjacent to the site to which this application relates.

9. 2017 NZSSAA 029 (23 June 2017) [pdf, 87 KB]

   ...Background [1] XXXX appeals the decision of 28 March 2014 to stop her accommodation supplement from 24 March 2014 on the basis that her assets were over the allowable limit. This decision was upheld by a Benefits Review Committee and Ms XXXX filed her appeal on 26 September 2016. [2] In January 2012 Ms XXXX asked the Ministry what assistance might be available to assist with relocation to Wellington for approximately two years for the purpose of resuming hormone treatment...

10. DQ v VJ & VJV Ltd [2015] NZDT 831 (8 September 2015) [pdf, 131 KB]

    ...Limited. On 7 June 2012 DQ and VJ signed an agreement for sale and purchase of the property for $179,000. Settlement took place on 6 July 2012. DQ is unhappy about water that lies on the driveway and footpath after heavy rain. On 5 July 2015 he filed a claim in the Tribunal for $6,000 from VJ and VJV Limited. [2] At the hearing CC appeared for VJ who was overseas and unable to attend the hearing. Issues [3] The issues are: a. Was the property misrepresented? and/or b. Was DQ...