Search Results

1. Sharma v Joseph [2018] NZIACDT 5 (6 March 2018) [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...is the sort of lapse that can occur when an inexperienced person embarks upon professional practice without the benefit of first gaining experience as an employee in a professional practice. [12] The reasons for maintaining high standards of file and information management are not always apparent. Failing to attend to critical steps such as entering an agreement for the provision of services is sometimes deferred, with a practitioner intending to do it later. That not only breach...

2. Feng v Zhang [2016] NZIACDT 35 (29 June 2016) [pdf, 74 KB]

   ...submissions (whether or not the Authority or the complainant makes submissions) within 15 working days of the issue of this decision. [13.3] The Authority and the complainant may reply to any submissions made by the adviser within 5 working days of her filing and serving those submissions. DATED at WELLINGTON this 29 th day of June 2016. ___________________ G D Pearson Chair

3. IG v QV LCRO 75 / 2011 (10 May 2012) [pdf, 72 KB]

   ...her instructing lawyer’s trust account she would not be in this situation. The Standards Committee did not deal with this aspect of the complaint, although it was clearly a matter before the Committee, noting that among the Standards Committee file was a copy of an email sent by the instructing solicitor to the Applicant referring to “... our Law Society rule that that prepaid fees must be held in trust until work done so [the Practitioner] ought not to have asked you to pay hi...

4. OC v SC LCRO 232-239 / 2011 (27 June 2012) [pdf, 50 KB]

   ...she could raise before the Tribunal. 4 [16] I have carefully considered all of the Applicant’s information, but in my view none of it can properly support a review of a prosecutorial decision. I also reviewed the Standards Committee file to satisfy myself as to procedural matters. I have found no reason for criticising the Standards Committee’s decision. [17] The Applicant was informed at the hearing that there was no basis for interfering with the Standards Commit...

5. Mann - Estate of Solomon Tiatoa (2008) 125 Whangarei MB 193 (125 WH 193) [pdf, 934 KB]

   ...with the remainder to Terimay Mann by reason of the intestacy arising; (b) Section 118 and 117(3) vesting the Maori land interests of the deceased in Terimay Mann solely by way offamily arrangement; (c) Section 158 dispensing with the need to file a special valuation; (d) Section 164 vesting the 25 shares of Terimay Mann in Mimitn Ruarei 6A in Jimmy Hei Te Rore by way of gift. 125 Whangarei MB 197 in oP'" em'" in Whmg=i " 4: /1 om/pm on~ <h, 12£ d&...

6. ENV-2016-AKL-000TBA Ron and Hannah Dunlop Family Trusts v Auckland Council [pdf, 769 KB]

   ...unitaryplan@aucklandcouncll.govtn~), within 20 working days after the Council notifies its decisions in relation to the recommendations of the Hearings Panel under section 148(4)(a) of the LGATPA (Le. by no later than 16 September 2016). You must pay the filing fee required by regulation 15 of the Resource Management (Forms, Fees, and Procedure for Auckland Combined Plan) Regulations 2013 at the time you lodge this notice with the Environment Court . If your appeal concerns a regional c...

7. ENV-2016-AKL-000TBA O'Grady v Auckland Council [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...unitaryplan@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz), within 20 working days after the Council notifies its decisions in relation to the recommendations of the Hearings Panel under section 148(4)(a) of the LGATPA (i.e. by no later than 16 September 2016). You must pay the filing fee required by regulation 15 of the Resource Management (Forms, Fees, and Procedure for Auckland Combined Plan) Regulations 2013 at the time you lodge this notice with the Environment Court. If your appeal concerns a regi...

8. [2018] NZEnvC 041 Double R Devlopments Limited v Western Bay of Plenty District Council [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...report to the Court about a timetable and other arrangements for the hearing of the appeal. burnetb Typewritten Text 041 burnetb Typewritten Text 41 " •. " ' 2 REASONS [1] Double R Developments Limited (the Appellant) has filed an appeal against an abatement notice issued to it by the Western Bay of Plenty District Council (the Council) requiring it to comply with a condition of its resource consent relating to a subdivision of a site at Hanlen Avenue, Waihi...

9. BORA Commerce (Criminalisation of Cartels) Amendment Bill [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...notification requirement limits the period of time that the defendant has to decide on their defence, and compels the defendant to provide information about their defence in advance of trial. While we note the ‘right to silence’ after charges have been filed is not specifically protected by the Bill of Rights Act,1 these provisions may arguably engage the rights protected by s 25 including the right to a fair trial, the right to present a defence, the right not to be compelled to confe...

10. [2018] NZEnvC 014 Vipassana Foundation Charitable Trust Board v Auckland Shooting Club [pdf, 140 KB]

    ...party and to require it to provide discovery on the same terms as the other respondents; c) Made in reliance on District Court Rules 4.56 and 8.17 and on s278(2) of the Act. [3] An affidavit of Kirsty Frances McKay affirmed on 31 January 2018 was filed in support of the application. Ms McKay affirms that information received from the Council included a site hazard sign on the subject property in the name of NZ Shooting Sports Centre. A search of the Companies Register shows that N...