Search Results

1. DQ Ltd v SM Ltd [2022] NZDT 6 (18 November 2021) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...McKinstry issued a decision in the applicant’s favour in the amount of $9,169.84. The Tribunal decision does not specifically address the set-off referred to in the application however the Tribunal decision did finally determine the application as filed, which as stated above included the $1,315.99 set- off. [5] The respondent claims it did not disagree with the Tribunal decision and paid the amount ordered by the due date. The respondent did not seek a rehearing or appeal the Tribunal d...

2. Te-Au-Reka-Capability-Model-October-2022.pdf [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...or higher complexity to the Courts and Tribunals. Te Au Reka capability model The capability model below illustrates the solution’s required functionality in five key areas: • Online portals (ePortal) – supporting participants to file, pay, access case information and track the progression of their case online. • Logistics management – supporting the right things to occur at the right time. • Content management – supporting the management, privacy and access t...

3. Te-Au-Reka-Capability-Model_October-2022.pdf [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...Ministry of Justice October 2022 October 2022 1 Te Au Reka capability model The capability model below illustrates the solution’s required functionality in five key areas: • Online portals (ePortal) – supporting participants to file, pay, access case information and track the progression of their case online. • Logistics management – supporting the right things to occur at the right time. • Content management – supporting the management, privacy and acces...

4. Family-Court-applications-jun2022-v1.0.xlsx [xlsx, 187 KB]

   ...through the court process. Therefore, this data may differ to data reported elsewhere with a different extraction date. These tables were extracted on 16 December 2022. Contents: Table 1a: Number and percentage of substantive Family Court applications filed, by case type, 2012/2013 - 2021/2022 Table 1b: Number and percentage of substantive Family Court applications filed, by case type and application outcome, 2012/2013 - 2021/2022 Table 1c: Number of substantive Family Court applications...

5. [2016] NZEmpC 155 Domingo v Suon and Heng t/aTown and Country Food [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...defence to the plaintiff’s claim within the applicable timeframe and until yesterday took no steps in relation to it. The claim was set down for hearing today by way of notice of hearing dated 29 September 2016. It appears from an affidavit filed on behalf of the plaintiff that the notice of hearing was subsequently served. [5] Yesterday afternoon (22 November 2016) a statement of defence was presented for filing along with a memorandum of counsel. I issued directions mak...

6. [2017] NZEnvC 185 Augustine Lau v Auckland Council [pdf, 134 KB]

   ...Judgment: o 7 NOV 2017 CORRECTION OF DECISION ON APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS AND DECISION ON FURTHER EVIDENCE Directions Any application for costs by the Auckland Council in respect of its application for security for costs must be filed and served by 15 November Lau v Auckland Council 2 2016. B. Any response by Mr Lau to that application for costs must be filed and served by 22 November 2017. C. The two affidavits of Augustine Lau sworn on 31 October 2017 and on...

7. [2019] NZEnvC 113 The Preservation Coalition Trust v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 817 KB]

   ...the proceeding was of public interest, noting again that if the application was not granted the appeal would continue.2 [4] The Trust has now sought a review of the Registrar's Decision.3 Procedural issue [5) The application for review was filed on 13 June 2019. Section 2818(2) of the Resource Management Act 1991 ("the Act") provides that any application must be made within ten working days after the Registrar's determination. This means that the application fo...

8. Blyde v Eastside Medical Centre (Strike-Out Application) [2020] NZHRRT 12 [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...Blyde has a long-term work-related injury. In 2017, Mr Blyde was a patient of Eastside Medical Centre (Eastside), when he became concerned about communications between Eastside and ACC. Mr Blyde made an information privacy request for his medical file, but he was not satisfied with the information provided. Mr Blyde subsequently complained to the Privacy Commissioner and then filed this claim. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Blyd...

9. [2024] NZEmpC 145 MAH Enterprises (Fiji) Limited & Anor v A Labour Inspector [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...No appearance for the plaintiffs J Ellison and AK Webster, counsel for defendant Judgment: 5 August 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS (Application to dismiss proceedings) Introduction [1] The plaintiffs filed a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority.1 Other than filing a statement of claim they have taken no steps in the Court 1 A Labour Inspector v MAH Enterprises (Fiji) Ltd [2023] NZERA 360. to adv...

10. CP v EH LCRO 19 / 2011 (12 November 2013) [pdf, 201 KB]

    ...costs. If, however, I get to the point of recommending an appeal, I would be prepared to do so for no fee if the appeal failed. If successful, I would charge you half of my usual fee. But in either case, I would need you to agree to cover the filing fee ($400) and the setting down and hearing fee which I believe is something in the order of $1,500. I would need to check. You would also have to accept sole responsibility for any costs award in the event of the appeal failing....