Search Results

1. Stephen Chiles (dated 12 May 2017) [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   ...seasonal and diurnal wind shear matrix (12 x 24 matrix of measured shear). The hub height time series of wind speed was then scaled to the proposed turbine location at a height of 69 m using the wind speed ratios calculated in Section 2.1.3. A csv file of the resultant time series accompanies this technical note (“Turbine1_69m.txt”). SSGC-019 DNV GL – Document No. PBO01-AUME-T-01, Issue A, Final Page 3 www.dnvgl.com 2.1.5 Time series of synthesised wind spee...

2. Taurua - Te Tii Waitangi A (2016) 143 Taitokerau MB 117 (143 TTK 117) [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...I had anticipated issuing a judgment by the end of August. Unfortunately, ill health has prevented me from issuing the decision until now. I apologise to the parties for any impact of that delay. I note that following the hearing some parties filed further information with the Court. I did not grant leave for that to occur and disregard that further material. [2] These applications concern Waitangi Marae. I issued three related decisions concerning the marae in 2015 and these d...

3. ENV-2016-AKL-000203 Frizzell v Auckland Council [pdf, 5.6 MB]

   ...copies may be obtained, on request, from the appellant. * I am lodging the following related proceedings concerning the Proposed Plan in the High Court: (a) [Giv d tails of any related proceedings]. * Delete eire aragraph if no related proceedings filed. Signatur of appellant (or person authorised to sign on behalf of appellant) LFM-423066-11-172-V1 :crg Appeal template- section 156(1) or 156(3) LGATPA appeals Page 4 Address for service of appellant: Telephone: 0 ~ ~ ~ '...

4. LCRO 215/2016 KP v VN (31 July 2018) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...[18] Ms VN also obtained a letter from Mr RH of the firm who had obviously been asked to check the firm’s records to find out whether there was any record of anyone at the firm, including Ms VN, having acted for Mr KP. Mr RH drew a blank. Files had “long since been destroyed” or not retained. [19] Ms VN says it is abundantly clear that she has never acted for Mr KP and confirms she has acted against him in the past. Based only on information provided by Mr RH, Ms VN ac

5. [2020] NZEnvC 172 Boyd v Queenstown Lakes District Council.pdf [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...2020: (a) any supplementary submissions as to the court's preliminary view that only the Boyd Group plan provisions should be the subject of s293 directions (rather than also the alternative QLDC provisions) must be by memorandum of counsel filed; and (b) QLDC must file a memorandum of counsel as to its position on whether or not directions are appropriate to allow for other persons to join the appeal proceedings for s293 purposes. [35] Leave is reserved to seek further (or other)...

6. Mark Brown (filed 6 June 2017) [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   1 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY ENV-2016-CHC-047 IN THE MATTER of an Appeal under Section 120 Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN Blueskin Energy Ltd Appellant AND Dunedin City Council Respondent BRIEF OF EVIDENCE of MARK NELSON BROWN Mark Brown 4, Erne Street Waitati 9085 Ph 482 2833 Email blueskin@xtra.co.nz P.O. Box 63 Waitati 9069 mailto:blueskin@xtra.co.nz 2 Intro

7. Matenga - Parish of Tahawai Lot 18C-F and 18I (2003) 73 Tauranga MB 150 (73 T 150) [pdf, 660 KB]

   Minute Book: 73 T 150 !n the Maori Land Court of New Zealand Waikato Maniapoto District DECISION: File: A20030001043 IN THE MATTER of land known as Parish of Tahawai Lot 18C-F and 181 AND IN THE MATTER of an application by Tracy Matenga pursuant to Section 19(1)(b) ofTe Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 for an Injunction prohibiting Nepia Bryan or his associates from entering or doing any injury to the house property situated on the land and with a street address of 15 Hikurangi...

8. Legal Complaints Review Officer v Morrison [2018] NZLCDT 27 [pdf, 422 KB]

   ...motivation for what he did in fact do. Decision [39] The Tribunal finds that the charge of misconduct is proved. It is not necessary to consider Charge 2 of failure to manage. It is dismissed accordingly. Directions 1. The applicant is to file submissions as to penalty within 14 days of the release of this decision. 2. The respondent is to file his submissions as to penalty within a further 14 days. 3. Counsel are to consult with the Tribunal Case Manager to allocate a date...

9. Napier v Registrar of the Real Estate Agents Authority [2019] NZREADT 7 (25 Feb 2019) [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...members of the media who have been present at a hearing may be provided with Minutes relating to “in Chambers” matters, but on the understanding that they are not to be published. [64] Tribunal Minutes are not part of the Tribunal’s public file. The Tribunal is not subject to the Official Information Act 1982, or any other statutory provision which might be thought to allow public access to Tribunal Minutes (for example, the Senior Court Act 2016). [65] We are not persuaded...

10. LCRO 142/2016 TR v YV (28 November 2018) [pdf, 181 KB]

    ...presented in Court, there is no direct evidence as to what advice Mr YV gave his client. In the circumstances, it could be considered to be somewhat invasive if a complaints body were to act on the views of opposing counsel and call for the lawyers’ files. [44] Even if it were to do so, the complaints body is not then able to put itself in the position of assessing the validity of the advice offered. A decision as to whether or not the advice was considered to be ‘competent...