Search Results

1. Tatere v Te Aute Trust Board - Mangatainoka No 1BC No 2C Tamaki 2A2A Balance [2013] Māori Appellate Court MB 105 (2013 APPEAL 105) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...Maori Appellate Court MB 107 Introduction [1] On 6 August 2009 Tau Anthony Hōhepa Edwards, Belinda Puanani Edwards, Donna Mahue Marsh, Michelle Awhina Edwards, Hester Vanessa Edwards and Josephine Mariana Henderson (“the Edwards whānau”) filed an application to remove Hōhepa Mei Tatere and Te Aroha Matawai Annette Edwards (“the Trustees”) as trustees of the Rua Roa and Ngawapurua Trusts (“the trusts”). The applicants are all children of one of the Trustees, Aroh...

2. Complaints Assessment Committee 409 v Andrew Rankin [2017] NZREADT 59 [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...he is guilty of misconduct. [6] The Tribunal heard evidence over two days. At the completion of the evidence the Tribunal directed (at counsel’s request) that a transcript of the evidence be prepared. Written closing submissions were then filed on behalf of the Committee and Mr Rankin. Final submissions were received by the Tribunal on 11 August 2017. Principles as to burden and standard of proof [7] As for any charge laid under s 110 of the Act, the Tribunal must be satis...

3. ENV-2016-WLG-000058 Notice of Motion [pdf, 4.8 MB]

   ...and advice to the Registrar will be complied with in due course. Where email addresses have been provided by submitters these will be used as a preference for service]; and (j) Upon the further grounds set out in the affidavit of Steven Sanderson filed in support of this Notice of Motion. 3. WIAL attaches the following documents: (a) An affidavit of Steven Sanderson in support of this Notice of Motion; and (b) A list of names and addresses of persons to be served with a copy of these...

4. Have your say on the family justice system [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...contribution orders’ These were all major changes, but from information we have gathered from many sources, the most important ones appear to be: • the introduction of Family Dispute Resolution (FDR) • the way in which applications are filed in the Family Court (the large increase in the number of without notice (urgent) applications) • removal of lawyers from the early stages of in-court processes that are not urgent. We have focused on these changes because researc...

5. [2018] NZEnvC 130 Friends of Nelson Haven Tasman Bay Incorporated v Tasman District Council [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...(TRMP) which were the subject of the Court's directions; and (c) to consider and include any consequential amendments that may be necessary and which the Court had not identified. [2] In accordance with those directions, a memorandum was filed by counsel for the Respondent on 1 June 2018. That memorandum set out a number of proposed amendments to the TRMP to give effect to the Court's decision and advised that these had been agreed among the parties. It also advised that...

6. [2016] NZEmpC 113 The Pulp and Paper Industry Council v Oji Fibre Solutions Ltd [pdf, 308 KB]

   ...paper and packaging business to Carter Holt Harvey Pulp and Paper Ltd with effect from 1 December 2014. That company was named as first respondent in the proceedings in the Authority and was originally named as first defendant in the proceedings filed in the Court by way of challenge to the Authority’s determination. [8] The second defendant’s employees had their employment terminated and were then transferred to the first defendant. The second plaintiffs, who do not repre...

7. [2017] NZEnvC 130 Butterbee Childcare Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 972 KB]

   ...change condition 58(a) from 10 to 14 days, to make it consistent with other conditions. These have been included in the Consent attached as A. Butterbee Childcare Limited v Auckland Council 2 B: Costs are reserved. Any application must be filed within ten (10) working days; any reply within a further five (5) working days after that. An application is not encouraged. REASONS Introduction [1] Butterbee Childcare Limited wishes to establish a childcare facility on a property...

8. [2019] NZEnvC 030 Zindia Limited v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 5.7 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA INTHEMATIER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019) NZEnvC 30 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 325 of the Act ZINDIA LIMITED (ENV-2018-CHC-178) Appellant MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Environment Commissioner J T Baines Hearing: at Blenheim on 17 December 2018 Appearances: Q A M Davies for the appellant A C Besier and K E Mitc

9. Hahn v Walke [2019] NZIACDT 19 (8 April 2019) [pdf, 306 KB]

   ...was accurate and had never facilitated the provision of unlicensed immigration advice. She was disturbed that the Authority had become the tool of a disgruntled competitor. The allegations were without substance and were malicious. Complaint filed with Tribunal [51] The Registrar of Immigration Advisers (the Registrar), the head of the Authority, filed a statement of complaint (24 April 2018) with the Tribunal, together with supporting documents. He has referred to the Tribunal...

10. CAC 414 & 416 v Tafilipepe [2019 ] NZREADT 13 (10 May 2019) [pdf, 332 KB]

    ...out at paragraph [46], above) the compliance letter stated (in summary): [a] the letter was not a finding of unsatisfactory conduct, and would not be recorded on the public register; [b] a copy of the letter would be kept on Ms Tafilipepe’s file along with any information she chose to provide, and the information would help the Authority decide how to respond if another complaint about Ms Tafilipepe’s professional conduct were received; [c] a copy of the letter had been...