Search Results

1. Te Manutukutuku 77 [pdf, 7.6 MB]

   ...contemporary claims. The strategic direction was envis- aged as both transitional and trans- formative. Success would enable the Tribunal to address most claims await- ing a hearing, moving it towards hear- ing new contemporary claims as they were filed and thus providing more timely access to justice for Māori claimants. To achieve this objective, the Tribunal set five strategic goals, which it aimed to achieve by the mid-2020s : SG1 complete the final district inquir- ies and remai...

2. [2016] NZEmpC 161 NZ Airline Pilots Assoc Inc v Air NZ Ltd [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...However, I touch on it briefly. [61] On Air New Zealand’s case it was not until 19 March 2010 that NZALPA informed it that its position was that the company could not rely on cl 12.1.11 to direct pilots to downtrain. A statement of problem was filed with the Authority on 7 April 2010. The company says that in 2009–2010 it was lulled into a false sense of security by the plaintiff, who created or encouraged a belief or expectation that it was entitled to compulsorily downtrain...

3. LCRO 83/2020 BA v SC (18 December 2020) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...noted Mr SC’s further explanation that he “had no knowledge” of the status of Ms BA’s proceedings against Mr FM before he spoke with Ms BA’s lawyer “around” late November or early December 2018. Application for review [27] Ms BA filed an application for review on 11 May 2020. [28] She says she disagrees with the Committee’s decision. She asks that Mr SC, or the legal executive be held accountable for not taking any action to ensure the $200,000 paid “was legit...

4. [2020] NZEmpC 46 JCE v The Department of Corrections [pdf, 321 KB]

   ...Costs are reserved. There is another proceeding in which the plaintiff successfully applied to strike out a challenge, by the department, of the same determination. That decision has also led to costs being reserved and submissions have been filed. It is likely that this decision will have an impact on consideration of costs by both parties, since there was an overlap between proceedings. The parties are invited to discuss costs and to attempt to reach agreement about them. If th...

5. Have your say on the family justice system [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...contribution orders’ These were all major changes, but from information we have gathered from many sources, the most important ones appear to be: • the introduction of Family Dispute Resolution (FDR) • the way in which applications are filed in the Family Court (the large increase in the number of without notice (urgent) applications) • removal of lawyers from the early stages of in-court processes that are not urgent. We have focused on these changes because researc...

6. Consultation Document - AML/CFT Early Regulatory Package Exposure Draft February 2023 [pdf, 494 KB]

   ...account monitoring obligations. The statutory review found two gaps in the current regime: • Businesses are not required to keep records of prescribed transaction reports. • The Act does not set out how long businesses should retain account files, business correspondence, and written findings. Statutory Review Recommen dation # Cabinet agreem ent # Cabinet agreement Regulatory Instrument and clause in draft M6.2.2 43 Require reporting entities to keep recor...

7. Consultation Document AML/CFT Early Regulatory Package Exposure Draft [pdf, 494 KB]

   ...account monitoring obligations. The statutory review found two gaps in the current regime: • Businesses are not required to keep records of prescribed transaction reports. • The Act does not set out how long businesses should retain account files, business correspondence, and written findings. Statutory Review Recommen dation # Cabinet agreem ent # Cabinet agreement Regulatory Instrument and clause in draft M6.2.2 43 Require reporting entities to keep recor...

8. [2022] NZEmpC 141 E Tū Inc and ors v Carter Holt Harvey LVL Ltd [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...Scale.28 Those ought to be able to be agreed. If that does not prove possible, the individual plaintiffs may apply for costs by filing and serving a memorandum within 21 days of the date of this judgment. Carter Holt LVL is to respond by memorandum filed and served within 14 days 27 Holidays Act 2003, s 29. 28 “Employment Court of New Zealand Practice Directions” <www.employment.govt.nz> at No 16. thereafter, with any reply from the individual plaintiffs fi...

9. [2021] NZACC 124- Singh v ACC (4 August 2021) [pdf, 355 KB]

   ...additional cover in relation to the disc protrusion. As a result in a decision dated 20 December 2019 ACC revoked the deemed cover on the basis that the 9 January 2013 accident was not the cause of the disc protrusion. A review application was filed in relation to that revocation decision. At the review hearing the Reviewer upheld ACC’s decision. This is an appeal from that Review decision. Background [3] Mr Singh came to New Zealand from India in 2012. He was working in...

10. [2021] NZREADT 18 - Brady (28 April 2021) [pdf, 338 KB]

    ...[6] The Tribunal heard evidence from Mr Peter Sullivan (licensed salesperson at Bayleys) who was the listing and selling agent for the property, Mr Rangi Callahan (Authority investigator), Mr Brady, and Mr Ma. Written statements of evidence were filed for each witness and they were available for cross-examination. [7] Mr Sullivan said that during Bayley’s marketing of the property, he was approached by Mr Brady who said he was representing Mr Ma of K&D, a prospective purchase...