Search Results

1. Chee v Stareast Investment Ltd [pdf, 23 KB]

   SUMMARY Case: Chee & Anor v Stareast Investment Ltd & Ors File No: TRI 2008-100-000091/ DBH 05577 Court: WHT Adjudicator: C Ruthe Date of Decision: 21 July 2009 Background The claimants brought a claim regarding their leaky home whereby much of the proposed remedial work was to prevent future possible leaks rather than for the low- level damage recorded to date. The Tribunal was therefore required to make determinations regarding the involvement of the following re...

2. PSPLA - Form: H Make a Complaint [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...Prosecutions Unit. Completing this form • Print clearly in CAPITALS • Use a black pen or blue pen to complete this form • Answer every question on the form unless the instructions tell you otherwise Payment information There is no filing fee with this application. Application process In normal circumstances the PSPLA will advise you within 5 working days of receipt of your complaint whether your complaint has been accepted and, if so, how it will proceed. Wh...

3. OWRUG, Lauder Water Users Group, Lauder Creek Ltd, DR & SA Hill - EiC - K Heckler (5 Feb 2021) [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...number of investigations into hydrology, ecology, and flow sharing of the Lauder Creek. To date the Lauder water Users Group has spent $92,411 on gathering data understanding our catchment and preparing our consent application which has now been filed. We foresee significant ongoing costs into the future before any permits are granted. 10. If we go through this process only to receive 6-year permits we will likely need to spend this money again. Most of our family farming business...

4. WISE - EiC - M J Salinger - Climate Change (filed 5 Feb 2021) [pdf, 2.8 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI ROHE ENV-2020-CHC-127 UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 ("the Act") IN THE MATTER of the Water Permits Plan Change - Plan Change 7, being part of a proposal of national significance directed by the Minister for the Environment to be referred to the Environment Court under section 142(2)(b) of the RMA AND IN THE MATTER of an applicatio

5. LCRO 112-2009 KO [pdf, 87 KB]

   ...was received and processed by the registry of this office on 30 July. [7] This set of facts requires me to decide when the application was “lodged” in light of the fact that postal application is accepted. The term lodged is better suited to filing in-person in which case there can be little doubt as to timing. If an applicant uses the postal system the onus must be on him or her to ensure that it arrives within the prescribed time limits. An application will be lodged when, in...

6. [2019] NZEmpC 196 A v N Ltd [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...challenge. The position might be different if the Authority had made a final determination on costs and there was no challenge against that determination. Even then, however, the Act and Regulations provide a basis upon which extensions of time for filing a challenge can be brought. The discretion of the Court to award costs, in my view, is sufficiently wide so that in circumstances such as exist in this case, the Court is not deprived of the ability to visit the issue of costs in...

7. LCRO 112/2009 KO - Decision on Jurisdiction (4 September 2009) [pdf, 58 KB]

   ...was received and processed by the registry of this office on 30 July. [7] This set of facts requires me to decide when the application was “lodged” in light of the fact that postal application is accepted. The term lodged is better suited to filing in-person in which case there can be little doubt as to timing. If an applicant uses the postal system the onus must be on him or her to ensure that it arrives within the prescribed time limits. An application will be lodged when, in...

8. Jumpjet Synopsis Submission Strike out Dec 2018 [pdf, 84 KB]

   ...Possible additional deferment requests are entirely feasible as a result of formal letter advice notified by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), as the organisation is unable to timeline complex technical processes. 6. The most up to date Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) Compliance Checklist published by the CAA indicates that New Zealand agrees to the safety standards of ICAO in RESA dimensions as published in ICAO Annex 14. Due to the fact that WIAL is negotiating a busine...

9. [2019] NZEmpC 164 Packwood v ANZ Bank New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...employment, amongst other approaches.7 [9] Mr Kynaston went on to say that there was insufficient evidence before the Court as to impecuniosity, so that it would be difficult for the Court to evaluate Ms Packwood’s submission. This resulted in her filing a helpful affidavit as to income and assets. 3 Relying on Items 11, 12, 13, 28, 30 and 34 of the Guideline Scale. 4 Sheppard v Scan Audio New Zealand Ltd [1999] 2 ERNZ 374....

10. [2021] NZEmpC 184 Coetzee v Oamaru Meats Ltd [pdf, 209 KB]

    ...the following table: Days $ Commencement 2 Commencement of defence to challenge by defendant 2 $4,780.00 Case Management 10 Preparation for first case management conference (including discussion about discovery) 0.4 $956.00 11 Filing memorandum for first or subsequent case management conference or mentions hearing 0.4 $956.00 13 Appearance at first or subsequent case management conference 0.3 $717.00 Preparation for witness hearing 33 Preparation of briefs...