LCRO 12/2014 EE v Standards Committee (31 May 2018) [pdf, 259 KB]
...would have had no power to retain the $13,500 in his trust account had the painting been done by the mortgagor without recourse to it; and (k) the fund would not then have been available for him to attach. Application for review [35] Mr EE filed an application for review on 14 January 2014. [36] He submits that: (a) the Committee’s decision was wrong in fact and law; (b) he had a considerable experience and expertise in the management of a nominee company; (c) his practi...