Search Results

1. [2016] NZSSAA 059 (16 June 2016) [pdf, 36 KB]

   ...appellant’s entitlement to benefit. On 29 January 2015, the appellant was sent a letter which advised: We refer to our letter dated 29 November 2014 which advised we would be taking no further action with your case however upon further review of your file and income earned we have determined a reassessment of past entitlements was necessary. The letter proceeded to set out eight employers the appellant had received income from and advised the appellant of an overpayment of $10,03...

2. TX v MGK [2013] NZIACDT 14 (19 March 2013) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...did she realise that the visa was specific to the business plan she submitted. The Response [10] Mr MGK responded to the complaint by email dated 14 July 2011 addressed to the Authority, which included a statement and supporting material from his file. [11] The key points made by Mr MGK were: [11.1] To initiate the process of gaining a visa a specific business opportunity had to be identified. [11.2] Working with Ms TX, Mr MGK identified a business in Warkworth. It met with Ms TX...

3. INZ v BUH [2013] NZIACDT 45 (01 August 2013) [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...has exercised his powers of referral solely under section 44(2)(b) of the Act, not section 44(2)(a). The latter section addresses negligence. Counsel representing Immigration New Zealand has not taken issue with the grounds of complaint, so has not filed a Statement of Reply. [24] The adviser admits she could be regarded as negligent; however, to find that there was negligence that was sufficiently serious to find a professional disciplinary breach would involve examining such threshold...

4. Dekker v Standing [2013] NZIACDT 50 (12 August 2013) [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...submissions (whether or not the Authority or Ms Dekker make submissions) within 15 working days of the issue of this decision. [25.3] The Authority and the complainant may reply to any submissions made by Mr Standing within 5 working days of him filing and serving those submissions. [26] The parties are notified that this decision will be published with the names of the parties after five working days, unless any party applies for orders not to publish any aspect. DATED at WELLING...

5. OL v PS LCRO 246 / 2011 (14 August 2012) [pdf, 78 KB]

   ...longer represent him. No disciplinary issues arise for the Practitioner in ceasing to act. [17] None of the additional grounds advanced for the review had been put to the Standards Committee when it considered the complaint. It is clear from the file that the Applicant had the opportunity to comment on the Practitioner’s response to the complaint and decided not to do so. That would have been a sufficient ground for declining to consider the new explanations in support of the...

6. Ihe - Tarewa East 1A (2008) 326 Rotorua MB 45 (326 ROT 45) [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...the block in order to a11ov,1 him the opportunity to travel to Australia and set up house there; ( e) the applicant has adveliised to the preferred class to see if there is any interest in purchasing the propeliy. Those adveliisements ,vere also filed v,lith the affidavit of the applicant on 21 FeblUary 2008; (f) there is no one in the preferred class of alienee who have come forward as a potential purchaser for the block; (g) there are no objections to the making of this applicat...

7. EJ v UQ Ltd [2015] NZDT 834 (29 September 2015) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...which expired in July 2012. [2] UQ Ltd is the local authorised service repair centre for Jeep. Between 2010 and 2012, at EJ’s request, UQ Ltd carried out 27 warranty claims to the value of $30,000 without cost to him. [3] In November 2014 EJ filed a claim for $10,887.51 from UQ LTd. EJ is unhappy with two of the repairs undertaken in 2012 by UQ Ltd (to the front differential housing and the electrical work on the engine). He is also unhappy that the bonnet decals and heat shield...

8. Wellington Standards Committee 2 v Morahan [2017] NZLCDT 34 [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...reflect on his fitness to practise as a barrister or solicitor or as to tend to bring the profession into disrepute. The full background to the charges found proved is set out in our decision of 22 September 2017. [2] We directed that, after the filing of submissions by counsel, penalty would be considered on the papers unless either of counsel requested a hearing. No request has been made. [3] The applicant has sought an order that the respondent be suspended from practice as a...

9. Judicial Protocol Audio Visual Links [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...officer or Registrar should state the following: "Y ou are remanded in custody and directed to appear by audio-visual link at (time) on (date)" 5. The judicial officer or Registrar should note the particulars of the direction on the court file. 6. When the judicial officer or Registrar presides over a hearing where A VL is used for an appearance of a participant he or she should: a. Introduce themselves to the participant b. Satisfy themselves that the person appearing by...

10. Kemp v Matenga - Ngatarawa and Ohiti Waitio Land Trust (2016) 55 Takitimu MB 142 (55 TKT 142) [pdf, 187 KB]

    ...overpayment and improper applications for grants and scholarships wish to make submissions in reply then they should be given every opportunity to do so either in writing, or preferably, in open Court. Decision [22] The trustees are directed to file: (a) details of the trust policies on education grants including copies of current and previous application forms. (b) excerpts from relevant trust minutes including trustee resolutions where education grants and scholarships hav...