Search Results

1. [2018] NZEmpC 123 Roach v Nazareth Care Charitable Trust Board [pdf, 567 KB]

   STEPHEN ROACH v NAZARETH CARE CHARITABLE TRUST BOARD NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2018] NZEmpC 123 [19 October 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2018] NZEmpC 123 EMPC 12/2018 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN STEPHEN ROACH Plaintiff AND NAZARETH CARE CHARITABLE TRUST BOARD Defendant Hearing: 24 – 25 July 2018 and further submissions on 15 October 2018 (Heard at Christchu

2. OWRUG - EiC - S H McKeague - Agriculture (4 Feb 2021) [pdf, 1022 KB]

   ...ORC website. Further details were 12 PP-1035600-2-216-V3 requested recently by the ORC and noted in Sally Dicey’s evidence as another Section 88 List. By way of example the application documentation for the Lauder Water User Group filed in January 2021 ran to 301 pages without Appendices. 44. The Lodged permit applications are very comprehensive. Restricting the replacement term to 6 or even 15 years at this stage seems counter intuitive when the proposals promo...

3. RIS Criminal Cases Review Commission [pdf, 497 KB]

   ...on prerogative of mercy applications is undertaken by lawyers in the Ministry of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel. The Ministry reviews the information and submissions supplied in support of the application and all relevant court and Police files. Where required, additional information will be gathered or further enquiries made. Assistance is sought, where required, from an independent adviser such as a Queen’s Counsel or retired Judge. The Ministry then prepares a comprehensi...

4. Beauchamp v B & T Co (2011) Ltd [2022] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...mediation was held but the matter was not resolved. [11] On 20 February 2017 Ms Beauchamp complained to the Human Rights Commission, who held a mediation but also failed to resolve the matter. MS BEAUCHAMP’S CLAIM [12] On 21 May 2018 Ms Beauchamp filed these proceedings alleging the defendants discriminated against her in employment because of her sex (pregnancy) in breach of HRA, s 22(1)(c) by: 3 [12.1] Dismissing her; and [12.2] Subjecting her to detriments during her...

5. Mercury NZ Ltd v Cairns - Pouakani River Bed (2022) 277 Waiariki MB 174 (277 WAR 174) [pdf, 417 KB]

   ...hapū. Chief Justice Elias, in her decision, noted that the status of the riverbed is undetermined and may be investigated by the Māori Land Court to establish whether it continues as unextinguished customary land. [8] The Pouakani applicants filed their current application, together with a statement of claim, in the Māori Land Court on 19 December 2019. [9] Mercury joined the proceedings on 20 February 2021, followed by the Attorney- General on 28 February 2021. [10] An amended...

6. OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL v NGA RUNANGA & Ors NOE ENV 20210628 [pdf, 481 KB]

   ...proceed on to ask you to read out your summary that you have helpfully prepared, but can you please confirm your full name for the Respondent? A. Yeah, my full name is Shane Anthony Enright. Q. And you are appearing today in support of a submission filed by 10 Southern Lakes Holdings Limited, is that correct? A. That’s correct. Q. And Southern Lakes Holdings Limited filed a submission on plan change 7? A. That’s correct. 15 Q. And you have also prepared, to assist the Co...

7. [2022] NZACC 132 - GG v ACC (11 July 2022) [pdf, 314 KB]

   ...stress and anxiety, eye movement desensitisation, rational emotive therapy, and personal counselling for problem- solving and conflict resolution. [17] On 4 March 2002, Professor Des Gorman and Dr Kathleen Callaghan, of UniServices, completed a file review and provided a report. They found a lack of definitive diagnosis, as treatment outcome was based on an appropriate diagnosis of all factors responsible for ongoing symptoms. They recommended that a case conference be held, invol...

8. [2021] NZACC 101 – OM v ACC (12 July 2021) [pdf, 271 KB]

   PURSUANT TO S 160(1)(b) ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 THERE IS A SUPPRESSION ORDER FORBIDDING PUBLICATION OF THE APPELLANT’S NAME AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPELLANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 101 ACR 271/19 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN OM Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATIO

9. B v Southern Response Earthquake Services Ltd [2021] CEIT-2021-0006 [pdf, 336 KB]

   ...separately as set out at 7. 6. The policyholder and Southern Response agree that the proceeding will not be discontinued at this stage, but: a. the joint experts' report following the conferral on 18 November 2015 is to be completed and filed by Friday 4 December 2015; b. the policyholder and Southern Response will file a Joint Memorandum of Counsel to seek a stay of the proceeding to 7 May 2016 to allow the steps set out at 7 to be completed; and c. the policyholder will f...

10. [2023] NZEnvC 133 Bay of Islands Maritime Park Incorporated v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 2.6 MB]

    ...the provisions. The only remaining issue in Topic 1B was the draft maps identifying where vehicles are permitted to drive on beaches and where they are restricted. The timetable for exchange of evidence was vacated and further time was given for filing of consent documents, including maps. [20] Consent documents were filed on 23 June 2023. Rule C.1.5.1 Use of vehicles on beaches and other activities that disturb the foreshore and seabed – permitted activity [21] Rule C.1.5.1...