Search Results

1. 2021-04-23 Minute - PC7 - Priorities conference [pdf, 163 KB]

   ...conference on Monday 3 May, with Monday 10 May as a reserve day. If the planning witnesses are not available, then court will look to set down the conference in the following week on 11–12 May 2021. Participating parties [6] Mr de Pelsemaeker filed a supplementary brief of evidence identifying persons who filed a submission or further submission on this or related topics.3 The Regional Council is now to file a memorandum identifying parties to the 2 RMA s 259. 3 De...

2. 2021-04-23 Minute - PC7 - Priorities conference 2 [pdf, 163 KB]

   ...conference on Monday 3 May, with Monday 10 May as a reserve day. If the planning witnesses are not available, then court will look to set down the conference in the following week on 11–12 May 2021. Participating parties [6] Mr de Pelsemaeker filed a supplementary brief of evidence identifying persons who filed a submission or further submission on this or related topics.3 The Regional Council is now to file a memorandum identifying parties to the 2 RMA s 259. 3 De...

3. Rehearings, appeals & stay of proceedings

   On this page: Rehearings Appeals Rehearings Both the landlord and the tenant can apply for a rehearing. You have 5 working days after the decision is issued to apply for a rehearing.  You do not need to pay a filing fee. You can use this form to apply for a rehearing. You can submit your application at the District Court where the original hearing took place.  You can send your application by email, by courier, or post or you can take into the court in person. Court contact informa...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Tenancy

4. [2015] NZEmpC 18 Severinsen & Anor v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 14 KB]

   ...in the next year are not counted in the calculation of the 28-day period. 1 Severinsen & Anor v AFFCO New Zealand Ltd [2014] NZERA Wellington 135. [3] The application for leave was filed on 10 February 2015. The explanation for the delay was said to be that the time limit for commencing a challenge had been miscalculated by the staff solicitor tasked with preparing the statement of claim. A supporting affidavit was f...

5. LCRO 43/2021 CAT Ltd v ZEN Lawyers Ltd (28 October 2021) [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...[14] On 7 February 2019, Mr BV prepared a memorandum for Ms PQ. That memorandum confirmed the instructions Mr BV understood he had received from CAT 1 On occasions [ZEN] will be referenced in this decision as "the lawyers". When Mr JM filed his complaint, he identified Mr BV’s firm as [ZEN] Lawyers Limited. The Standards Committee referenced the firm in its decision as ZEN Limited. In his review application, Mr JM identifies the firm as ZEN Law. The letters of engagement...

6. McCreath v Attorney-General (Costs) [2016] NZHRRT 4 [pdf, 55 KB]

   ...[2016] NZHRRT 4] 2 Introduction [1] On 14 June 2012 in the District Court at Christchurch Mr McCreath was sentenced to six years and three months’ imprisonment on a number of charges including theft and burglary. By statement of claim filed on 19 July 2013 he alleged the Attorney-General as well as Nurse A and Nurse B discriminated against him on the basis of his sex at a time when he was an inmate at Christchurch Men’s Prison and receiving medical treatment. Following long...

7. LCRO 138/2018 CE and AB v UE (8 August 2018) [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...applicant was provided with a copy of the determination, where the determination has not been served on or given to the applicant. [16] There are two critical elements to s 198. First, the section ensures that applicants have adequate time to file an application for review. Secondly, the section imposes obligation on an applicant to file their application promptly. This is intended to ensure that the statutory objective of having complaints dealt with expeditiously is achieved....

8. [2019] NZEmpC 13 Rayner v Director-General of Health [pdf, 281 KB]

   ...challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN AMANDA RAYNER Plaintiff AND DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF HEALTH Defendant EMPC 14/2019 AND IN THE MATTER of an application for leave to file a challenge out of time BETWEEN DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF HEALTH Applicant AND AMANDA RAYNER Respondent Hearing: Submissions-only on 5 February 2019 Appearances: A Oberndorfer, advocate for...

9. [2022] NZACC 6 – Jones v ACC (19 January 2022) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...decision; and, even if there were such jurisdiction, no ground had been established warranting the making of an order recalling the decision. The Court therefore dismissed the application for leave to recall. 2 [3] On 25 August 2021, Mr Jones filed an application for leave to appeal against the Court’s decision. [4] On 21 September 2021, a minute of Judge Henare provided a timetable for filing of submissions and directed that the application would then be determined on t...

10. [2023] NZEmpC 175 Carrington Resort Jade LP v Maheno [pdf, 235 KB]

    ...of the hearing of the challenge. [8] Ms Maheno provided submissions on those matters, but Carrington did not. Good faith report details numerous incidents of concern [9] The Authority noted that Carrington engaged with the Authority by: (a) filing a statement in reply; (b) filing some, minimal, documents to the Authority; (c) filing some witness statements; (d) attending a case management conference; (e) attending the investigation meeting; and (f) filing substantive submi...