Search Results

1. [2018] NZSSAA 034 (18 July 2018) [pdf, 132 KB]

   ...SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY S Pezaro - Deputy Chair C Joe - Member Hearing at Auckland on 16, 17 May 2018 Appearances The appellant in person P Siueva, agent for the Chief Executive DECISION Background [1] XXXX (the appellant) filed two appeals against decisions by the Chief Executive to deduct lump sum back payments of his United Kingdom Pension (UKP) from his New Zealand Superannuation (NZS) entitlement. These decisions were upheld by Benefit Review Commit...

2. [2018] NZSSAA 46 (20 September 2018) [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...January 2014 to 7 January 2015. This decision was upheld by a Benefits Review Committee on 1 April 2016. By this time, the period over which the overpayments were established had been extended, for the reasons that follow. [2] The appeal was filed on 13 June 2016 and part heard by the previous Deputy Chair of the Authority in December 2016. As recorded in the direction issued on 22 February 2017, the Deputy Chair’s term ended before he could complete the hearing. Therefore...

3. [2018] NZEmpC 130 Kocaturk v Zara’s Turkish Ltd [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...conclusion of the proceedings. [8] Mr and Mrs Kocatürk responded to the application, saying that their challenge has substantive merit, is being prosecuted in good faith and that the overall justice of the matter favours them. Mr and Mrs Kocatürk filed a joint affidavit. In that affidavit, they point out that they had agreed to stay the payment of the award made to Mrs Kocatürk with the funds (totalling $61,813.07 gross) to be held by the Registrar of the Court, which provi...

4. [2020] NZREADT 13 - Beatson - Ruling on costs (1 May 2020) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...intervention of the Tribunal. [2020] NZREADT 13 - Beatson - ruling on costs [25] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act 2008, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Act 2008, which sets out appeal rights. Any appeal must be filed in the High Court within 20 working days of the date on which the Tribunal’s decision is served (s 116A). The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules. Mr J Doogue Deputy Chairperson...

5. [2020] NZREADT 14 - Rogers (20 March 2020) [pdf, 139 KB]

   ...2016 of a crime involving dishonesty, she is not eligible to hold a licence under s 37(1)(a) of the Act. The Registrar advised Ms Rogers of her right to seek a review of the Registrar’s decision. Submissions [11] Ms Rogers did not wish to file submissions. She referred to the material she had submitted to the Registrar. [12] On behalf of the Registrar, Mr Sugrue submitted that the issue to be determined is whether the Registrar erred in fact or law in declining Ms Rogers’ Ap...

6. [2019] NZEnvC 181 Horowhenua District Council v Chambers [pdf, 2.5 MB]

   ...Council. The application and Mr Amos' affidavit in support were served on Mr Chambers on Saturday 25 May 2019. Additionally, on instruction from the Court, the Council arranged service on Mr Chambers of a minute, advising him that if he had not filed an appearance by Friday, 14 June 2019, the application would be dealt with "on the papers". 1 The Court has not received any response from Mr Chambers to the proceedings. The Council application [4] The terms of the Cou...

7. 2022-03-02 Hearing Notice - PC8 (Urban Provisions) - Commencing Monday 21 March 2022 [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...proceedings then the Court may order the party or parties to pay any costs and expenses incurred by the Crown or another party. This may happen where the hearing time allocated by the Court is not used. 2 EVIDENCE Evidence should be filed in accordance with the court’s directions, which are available here: • https://environmentcourt.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Publications/2021-12-14-Minute-PC1- Chapter-7-Landfills-PC8-Part-A-G-H.pdf 3 MĀORI LANGUAGE AND SPECIAL...

8. [2022] NZACC 35 – Stryder v ACC (10 March 2022) [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...allowed Mr Stryder’s appeal in respect of the Corporation’s decision declining to pay him weekly compensation between 16 April 2014 and 11 October 2015. Judge McGuire directed that, should there be any issue as to costs, counsel had leave to file memoranda in respect thereof. Memoranda were duly filed.1 [4] On 28 January 2021, Judge McGuire dismissed Mr Stryder’s (parallel) appeal in relation to the Corporation’s decision not to pay $1207.50 for a report (dated 31 Octobe...

9. 5 LEG paper Approval for introduction Redacted [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...after the repeal takes effect. 6 The repeal will apply from enactment to all relevant active criminal proceedings, except those where conviction and sentencing have been completed before the Bill comes into force. This will prevent offenders from filing appeals to bring themselves within the ambit of the repeal legislation. 7 The Bill excludes any entitlement to compensation relating to the impacts of the three strikes law. Compensation would go beyond the purpose of the repeal of th...

10. [2021] NZEmpC 133 Ngawaka v Global Security Solutions Ltd [pdf, 186 KB]

    ...Authority’s order that he pay those costs; (c) has made claims that are “unmeritorious”, having been fully canvassed by the Authority; (d) was given advanced notice that Global Security would be applying for security for costs; (e) has filed pleadings making it difficult to ascertain, with “any real clarity”, how he considers the Authority erred in fact or in law; and (f) that its legal bills to date have amounted to just over $9,900 and its forecast expenses for the...