Search Results

1. NZCASS Technical manual [pdf, 5.3 MB]

   ...Māori booster sample (screened sample) 29 2014 NZCASS 29 2009 NZCASS 30 2006 NZCASS 30 Tertiary sampling unit – Respondent selection 30 Probabilities of selection 31 Meshblock 31 Dwelling 31 Respondent 32 Process for incorporating address files 32 3. Questionnaire and incident selection 33 Introduction 33 Mode of interviewing 33 The questionnaire 34 Selection of incidents 36 Selection of incidents in the CAPI section 36 Selection of incidents in the CASI section 37 Incident...

2. Protection-order-applications-jun2022-v1.0.xlsx [xlsx, 299 KB]

   ...Temporary Order is granted. This means theses applications can ultimately result in any of the application outcomes. *The number (and also the percentage) of applications granted in the latest year is lower than in previous years because some applications filed in that year are still before the court at the time the data was extracted. For the same reason, the number (and percentage) of applications still active is higher in the latest year. Approximately 58%-60% of Without notice applications...

3. [2011] NZEmpC 31 Ravnjak v Wellington International Airport Ltd [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...plaintiff relevant to the surveillance question. The documents considered include the statement of problem and statement in reply in the Employment Relations Authority, the witness statement of Mr Hardiman dated 15 March 2011, and an affidavit filed subsequently by him in the Authority sworn on 23 March 2011, and the witness statements of other witnesses intending to give evidence to the Authority. I have not viewed the video recordings or any parts of them and have not taken acco...

4. [2007] NZEmpC WC 25/07 AFFCO NZ Ltd v Nepia & Anor [pdf, 82 KB]

   ...the Authority were not in dispute. I have found that the employees did not contribute to their dismissal. The awards of the Authority are confirmed. Costs [80] These are reserved. If they cannot be agreed counsel for the defendants is to file a memorandum within 28 days of this judgment. The plaintiff has 14 days after that to file a memorandum in reply. C M Shaw JUDGE Judgment signed at 11am on 28 September 2007

5. Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination – summary record 18th-20th reports [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...disproportionate percentage of Maori and people of Polynesian descent in prison remained an unresolved problem. He asked how many of the 653 complaints alleging discrimination on race-related grounds in the area of employment between 2005 and 2011 had been filed by Maori and Pacific Islanders and with what results. 42. Mr. Kut welcomed the Government’s policy initiatives regarding the territory of Tokelau but underlined the importance of monitoring and assessing their impact. He a...

6. [2014] NZEmpC 194 Commissioner of Police v Coffey [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...into Mr Coffey's 1999 agreement. For these reasons, the plaintiff's non de novo challenge is dismissed. [56] The defendant is entitled to costs. If this issue cannot be agreed upon between the parties then Mr O'Sullivan is to file submissions within 21 days of the date of this judgment and Mr Churchman will have a further 21 days from receipt of Mr O'Sullivan's submissions in which to file submissions in response. A D Ford Judge...

7. [2014] NZEmpC 208 Hayne v ASG [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...is that given the importance of the matters raised, costs in both the Authority and this Court should lie where they fall. If the University as the successful party wishes the Court to consider an application for costs, however, that should be filed within 21 days; and ASG’s response should be filed within 21 days thereafter. B A Corkill Judge For the full Court Judgment signed at 4.00 pm on 11 November 2014...

8. [2015] NZEmpC 24 Lowe v Director-General of Health, Ministry of Health & Ors [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...conference to discuss this issue; it will be scheduled for a convenient date two months hereafter. [61] We also reserve questions as to costs; we anticipate the parties will be able to resolve this issue directly, but if not, the plaintiff may file a memorandum and evidence within 28 days after the delivery of this judgment. The first and second defendants may file memoranda and evidence (if any) 28 days thereafter. In accordance with the usual practice, the intervener sho...

9. Wallace v CAC 20006 & Baker [2014] NZREADT 75 [pdf, 72 KB]

   ...refused to settle the purchase. [7] The complainants' maintained that the wardrobes did not form part of the sale. Ultimately, the complainants returned the wardrobes and settlement was completed. [8] However, the complainants subsequently filed a complaint to the Real Estate Agents Authority alleging the following: [a] First, that the licensees had failed to disclose to the purchasers of the property that three free-standing BoConcept wardrobes in the house were not include...

10. [2013] NZEmpC 206 Candyland Ltd v Jarvis [pdf, 135 KB]

    ...25 per cent for contributory conduct. [54] The defendant is entitled to costs on the challenge in this Court. If they cannot otherwise be agreed between the parties they may be the subject of an exchange of memoranda with the defendant filing and serving any memoranda and supporting documentation within 30 days of the date of this judgment and the plaintiff filing and serving a reply within a further 20 days. Christina Inglis Judge Judgment sign...