Search Results

1. [2019] NZEnvC 109 Ngati Pukenga ki Pakikaikutu v Heritage NZ Pouhere Taonga [pdf, 6.8 MB]

   ...to Ms Jacqueline Scott is confirmed subject to conditions 2, 7 and 9 being modified to include reference to Mr Parata, Ngati Pukenga ki Pakikaikutu and Pakikaikutu 2C2W Papakainga Trust as per [72] . B: Final wording for the Authority is to be filed by Heritage NZ within five working days for approval by the Court. C: Costs are reserved but not encouraged. If any party seeks costs they are to file application within 10 working days, reply within 1 O working days and final reply (i...

2. [2020] NZREADT 38 - Barfoot v Real Estate Agents Authority (26 August 2020) [pdf, 285 KB]

   ...1902) First Respondent AND LEJUN (JAMES) WU and SHUNYI (CANDY) CAO Second Respondents On the papers: Tribunal: Mr J Doogue (Deputy Chairperson) Ms C Sandelin (Member) Mr N O’Connor (Member) Submissions filed by: Mr T Rea, on behalf of the appellant Ms L Lim, on behalf of the Authority Date of Decision: 26 August 2020 ________________________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF THE TRIBUNA...

3. [2019] NZEnvC 207 Archibald v Christchurch City Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...proposal is for land use consent to establish guest accommodation within an existing dwelling at 52A Creyke Rd. Evidently, the applicant has been renting the dwelling through Airbnb without consent and, as a result of a complaint by a neighbour, has filed this application. The dwelling is a two-storey home with four bedrooms located on the ground floor and two on the first floor, together with three living areas and a games room. The proposal is to rent out the dwelling to accommodate...

4. INZ (Carley) v De'Ath [2020] NZIACDT 10 (19 February 2020) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 9 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 8, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 13 [59] There are no submissions from the complainant. [60] On behalf of Mr De’Ath, Mr Moses has filed a statement of reply (20 February 2019). [61] No party has sought an oral hearing. ASSESSMENT [62] The Registrar relies on the following provision of the Code: General 1. A licensed immigration adviser must be honest, professiona...

5. LCRO 086/2017 AC v BD (15 November 2018) [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...would raise some kind of tax implications”. This led to the Committee reaching the conclusion that because Mr BD did not recommend Mr AC obtain tax advice, [Mr BD’s] conduct was unsatisfactory. Application for review 5 [21] Mr AC filed an application for review on 2 May 2017. He claims the Committee did not resolve his complaint “fairly”. [22] He seeks the imposition of penalties against Mr BD, particularly payment of compensation by Mr BD. He says as a resul...

6. Te Manutukutuku issue 75 [pdf, 7.6 MB]

   ...Maraeroa From the Chairperson accommodating overlapping claimant interests. All of the recent kaupapa and urgent reports, including those on large and complex subjects such as freshwater and primary health, have been pro- duced within months of the filing of the parties’ final closing submissions. This reflects the Tribunal’s commit- ment to delivering rapid and practical results on pressing contemporary issues. The Tribunal panels concerned and the staff supporting them are...

7. [2021] NZEnvC 183 Clutha District Council v Vreugdenhil Family Trust Partnership [pdf, 358 KB]

   ...some time, and its use as a public road in future is [not] realistically foreseeable. [Footnotes omitted] 10 [34] We now consider the matters in the Tenth Schedule to the Act. The district plan [35] At the court’s request, the Council filed copies of district plan provisions. The relevant district plan is the Clutha District Plan. The properties involved in this case are in the Rural Resource Area. [36] In terms of land use patterns and trends, the Plan notes that ‘...

8. [2022] NZEmpC 33 Capital and Coast District Health Board v Public Service Association, Te Pukenga Here Tikanga Mahi [pdf, 311 KB]

   ...the DHBs had been addressed and went well beyond the prescribed requirements for life preserving arrangements. The PSA remain willing to address any additional reasonable matters that the DHBs may wish to raise. The DHBs had delayed filing the proceedings until only two days before this strike action, despite having 14 days’ notice of the first strike. The position adopted by the DHBs as to pay equity issues conflicts directly with agreements already made with other ve...

9. LCRO 208/2021 PK v GH (13 June 2023) [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...on NZ Law Society guidelines and will take into account all relevant factors, including the time spent on the engagement by professional staff at charge out rates appropriate to their levels of skill, experience and responsibility. … This file will be charged on a time basis at my hourly rate (currently $350.00 per hour) plus GST. … Master Terms of Business All services are provided subject to the terms and limitations set out in our Master Terms of Business which are attach...

10. [2025] NZLCDT 2 Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Wintour (9 January 2025) [pdf, 193 KB]

    ...refrained from mentioning it earlier. We find that this allegation was added on late by Mr Wintour to bolster his case. [36] On the day he was cross-examined, Mr Wintour returned after lunch with a handwritten note he said he had found on his file. We allowed him to produce it26 in re-examination. It is headed “Narrative” and appears to list topics that might support his narrative, perhaps an early draft of a document. We cannot know when and in what circumstances it was wr...