Search Results

1. [2024] NZEnvC 161 Eden Epsom Residential Society Incorporated v Auckland Council [pdf, 7.2 MB]

   ...for resolution. C: No decision is required in respect of parking requirements as there has been further change to the Auckland Unitary Plan. D: An application for costs is not encouraged. If the same is to be made by any party it is to be filed within 40 working days, any reply within 15 working days thereafter, and a final reply, if any, five days after that. REASONS Introduction [1] This decision relates to an application by Southern Cross Hospitals Ltd (Requestor o...

2. Youth Justice minimum dataset: data integration pilot [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...purposes. However, we found that there are considerable differences in Police and CYF area boundaries that meant that we had to rule this methodology out. The data from CYF was provided in SAS11 datasets, while the data from Police was provided in CSV files which were then read into SAS. SAS was used to both examine the data and link data from the two sources. The data integration process is described in depth in section 5.3. 11 SAS is an int...

3. [2008] NZEmpC WC 17/08 Witcombe v Clerk of the House of Representatives [pdf, 219 KB]

   ...Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF preliminary issues of privilege BETWEEN ALAN WITCOMBE Plaintiff AND CLERK OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Defendant Hearing: 14 and 15 November 2006 And by further submissions filed on 21 November 2006, 17 and 31 July and 9 August 2007 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: GC Davenport, Counsel for Plaintiff PJ Gunn, Counsel for Defendant Judgment: 26 September 2008 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE GL COL...

4. OIA-114187.pdf [pdf, 6.2 MB]

   ...section 9(2)(f)(iv) 5. 11 July 2024 Briefing 11 July 2024 Work Programme Some information withheld under section 9(2)(a) and 9(2)(f)(iv) Hon Paul Goldsmith, Minister of Justice Ministry of Justice Policy Work Programme Date 21 December 2023 File reference Action sought Timeframe Discuss the work programme and your priorities for 2024 with officials At your earliest convenience in January 2024 Contacts for telephone discussion (if required) Name Position Telephone First co...

5. ASC - 2013 annual report [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...considering termination of pregnancy totalled $4,096,464 (GST exclusive) in the year ended 30 June 2013. 28 appendix ONE Visits Certifying Consultants << /ASCII85EncodePages false /AllowTransparency false /AutoPositionEPSFiles true /AutoRotatePages /None /Binding /Left /CalGrayProfile (Dot Gain 20%) /CalRGBProfile (Apple RGB) /CalCMYKProfile (U.S. Web Coated \050SWOP\051 v2) /sRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CannotEmbedFontPolicy /Warning...

6. [2007] NZEmpC WC 32A/07 Port of Napier Ltd v Maritime Union of NZ Inc [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...crane drivers’ resistance to participating in stevedore training was motivated, at least in material part, by a belief that the refusal was justified on the grounds of safety or health. The more comprehensive affidavit evidence now filed tends to confirm that there are and were reasonable grounds for that belief. There may, of course, be mixed motives but I do not think it is strongly arguable, on the evidence seen by me, that there was no reasonable belief by the cra...

7. [2010] NZEmpC 154 Villegas v Visypak (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 68 KB]

   ...anything wrong. In these circumstances I an award of $5,000 under s 123(1)(c)(i) of the Act. Costs [74] The challenge having been successful, the plaintiff is entitled to costs. If the parties cannot agree on costs a memorandum should be filed and served within 30 days from the date of this judgment with a memorandum in response filed and served within a further 30 days. B S Travis Judge Judgment signed at 9.15am on 23 November 2010...

8. [2009] NZEmpC AC 30/09 Masonry Design Solutions Ltd v Bettany [pdf, 74 KB]

   ...the challenge, questions of costs in this Court (including costs reserved on interlocutory applications) together with costs in the Authority are reserved. If these cannot be settled between the parties then the plaintiff may apply by memorandum filed and served within one month of the date of this judgment with the defendant having a like period within which to file a memorandum in opposition. GL Colgan Chief Judge Judgment signed at 12.30 pm on Friday 21 August 200...

9. Yan v CAC306 & Anor [2015] NZREADT 47 [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...she was misled into making two pre- auction offers. However, before us the appellant’s focus was confined to the bidding and deposit cheque issues. Salient Evidence Adduced to Us Evidence of the Appellant Complainant [15] Ms Yan, helpfully, filed many memoranda prior to the fixture which we have accepted as comprising an overall brief of her evidence-in-chief. [16] From some real estate source, since her purchase of (the apartment), the complainant has become convinced that it...

10. Tukapua v Taueki - Horowhenua Block 11 (2012) 278 Aotea MB 172 (278 AOT 172) [pdf, 163 KB]

    ...additional trustee. 1 This was on the basis that it was said the trustees had become deadlocked five votes to five and could no longer meet or make decisions due to conflicts that had arisen. The hearing had originally arisen out of an application filed by another trustee, Vivienne Taueki, for the removal of the chairperson, Jonathon Proctor, per s240 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993. That application was dismissed by the Chief Judge and his decision is now subject to appeal....