Search Results

1. Rangahaua Whanui National Overview volume 3 [pdf, 2.5 MB]

   ...of Crown grants, that the final determination of title was often only an approximation of the original agreement. None the less it was, in most cases, Bell’s decisions that were enforced by the Crown. Reworking Bell’s decisions from the original files, Dr Barry Rigby with other Tribunal researchers have been able more accurately to estimate the extent of Maori land alienation through this process, particularly in some important sub-regions within the Auckland district. In total in the Auc...

2. Waitangi Tribunal - Matua Rautia Report on the Kōhanga Reo claim [pdf, 4.2 MB]

   M a t u a R a u t i a Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 2 W a i 2 3 3 6 M a t u a R a u t i a t h e R e p o r t o n t h e K ō h a n g a R e o C l a i m P r

3. Barlow v Phillips - Rangitoto Tuhua 55B1B and other blocks (2012) 282 Aotea MB 75 (282 AOT 75) [pdf, 419 KB]

   ...letter dated 25 September 2002 the Registrar of the Māori Land Court confirmed that the Māori Land Court records had been updated. As an aside, counsel informed the Court that an application pursuant to s 151 of Part 8 of TTWMA had now been filed with the Court. [20] At the time of the transfer in March 1999 the respondents say that all the criteria outlined in s 152 of TTWMA were met and that the letter from the Registrar indicated that the Court approved and acknowledged the tr...

4. Protection order applications June 2017 [xlsx, 196 KB]

   ...Table 1: Number of Protection Order applications, by application type and court, 2007/2008 - 2016/2017 For more information on how to interpret these figures, please read the Definitions and data notes. Return to Contents page Example interpretation: In 2016/2017, there were 5492 applications filed for Protection Orders. Most of these were Without notice applications, where urgent protection was being sought. Application type 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/20...

5. [2007] NZEmpC CC 15/07 Terry Young Ltd v New Zealand Engineering Printing and Manufacturing Union Inc [pdf, 41 KB]

   ...non-de novo challenge to part of a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN TERRY YOUNG LIMITED Plaintiff AND NZ ENGINEERING, PRINTING AND MANUFACTURING UNION INCORPORATED Defendant Hearing: by memoranda of submissions filed on 21 June and 4 and 11 July 2007 Appearances: JR Copeland, Counsel for Plaintiff JA Wilton, Counsel for Defendant Judgment: 25 July 2007 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE GL COLGAN Nature of proceeding [1] As part of the p...

6. [2011] NZEmpC 104 Creedy v Commissioner of Police [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...104 ARC 130/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN MARK RAYMOND CREEDY Plaintiff AND COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on 10 and 30 March 2011 and a hearing on 20 July 2011 (by telephone conference call) Counsel: Alex Hope, counsel for plaintiff Sally McKechnie, counsel for defendant Judgment: 11 August 2011 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGA...

7. [2010] NZEmpC 57 Smith v Attorney-General for Commissioner Of Police [pdf, 29 KB]

   ...instance trial and there was no opportunity to economise by building on a prior foundation. The defendant also makes the point that he bore the burden of preparing an agreed bundle of documents notwithstanding that responsibility for preparing and filing this was directed to be the plaintiff’s. The defendant likewise prepared the agreed chronology. In addition to the hearing itself which occupied four days, there were three telephone conferences between counsel and the Court an...

8. EMPC Courtroom advocacy essential skills 2 etiquette [pdf, 227 KB]

   ...conference, to enable the Judge to distinguish between the people who are talking. Comply with timetabling orders. Do not assume that the Judge will share your sense of priorities or that an extension will be granted. Take care with the documents you file, and ensure they are accurate and adequately supported. Avoid “smart tactics”, such as bombarding your opposing counsel with numerous last-minute applications. Judges are aware of such tactics and they often rebound.14 Yo...

9. [2007] NZEmpC WC 30/07 Secretary for Education & Ors v New Zealand Educational Institute (Inc) [pdf, 32 KB]

   ...sick leave under clause 6.2.5(i) is to be done without distinction as to physiological or psychological illness. Costs [31] These are reserved. Counsel are encouraged to resolve these but if this is not possible the defendant is to file a memorandum as to costs within 28 days of the date of this judgment. The plaintiffs will have 14 days to reply. C M Shaw JUDGE Judgment signed at 10.00am on 30 November 2007

10. [2006] NZEmpC AC 24A/06 Designlink Ltd t/a Rodney Wayne Hairdressing Whangaparaoa & Pipes v Raymond [pdf, 37 KB]

    ...application for costs BETWEEN DESIGNLINK LIMITED T/A RODNEY WAYNE HAIRDRESSING WHANGAPARAOA First Plaintiff AND ANTHONY TERENCE PIPES AND CHERYL PIPES Second Plaintiffs AND BRENDA RAYMOND Defendant Hearing: by memoranda of submissions filed on 26 May, 21, 22, 23 June and 4 July 2006 Judgment: 18 August 2006 COSTS JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE GL COLGAN [1] The defendant, Brenda Raymond, seeks costs as a result of the Court’s finding in her favour in a judgmen...