Search Results

1. Taipari v Hauraki Maori Trust Board (2008) 114 Hauriki MB 34 (114 H 34) [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...two weeks in DAVID TAl PARI, WILLIAM PETERS, PARI TUPUHlAND JOHNTAMIHERE V HAURAK~ TRUST BOARD MLC A20070008668 [30 April 2008] 114 Hauraki MB 34-75 114 Hauraki MB 37 order that the hearing could take place as soon as possible. Affidavits were filed and it was agreed that deponents would not be cross-examined so that hearing time was devoted to the legal submissions of the parties. Counsel for the elected reps produced a statement of issues in order to focus the hearing on those...

2. [2021] NZEnvC 051 Rangitane O Tamaki v Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council [pdf, 4.6 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA Court: Hearing: Appearances: IN THE MATTER OF Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 51 appeals under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN RANGITANE O TAMAI<.I NUI A RUA INCORPORATED AND AND (ENV-2018-WLG-000034) TARARUA COUNCIL DISTRICT (ENV-2018-WLG-000035) Appellants IvlANA WATU-WANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent TARARUA DISTRICT COUNCIL Applicant Envir

3. [2021] NZEnvC 103 Wyuna Preserve Residents Association Incorporated v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 19 MB]

   ...Collins (and other experts) continued during cross-examination and court-questioning. Before the hearing concluded, parties sought the opportunity for further discussions. The court facilitated that by an adjournment following which the parties filed a joint memorandum proposing related directions. They jointly identified as topics for discussion:13 1. Including an appropriate objective/purpose for the designation 11. Defining in the designation what the Noise Management Plan is req...

4. [2022] NZEnvC 058 Barnhill Corporate Trustee v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 995 KB]

   QTN PDP – TOPICS 25 AND 30 RE WAKATIPU BASIN TEXT – INTERIM DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 58 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND appeals under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN BARNHILL CORPORATE TRUSTEE LIMITED and all other appellants concerning Topics 25 and 30 of Stage 2 of the proposed Queenstown Lakes District Plan (ENV-2019-CHC-086) Appel

5. [2024] NZEnvC 101 Pascoe v Minister for Land Information [pdf, 371 KB]

   ...land found to be fair, sound and reasonably necessary for achieving the objectives of the Minister. No directions made. B: Costs reserved. 2 REASONS Introduction [1] Tony James Sofus Pascoe and Debbie Ann Pascoe (the Pascoes) have filed an objection to a notice of intention to take land (the Notice) served on them by the Minister for Land Information (the Minister) pursuant to s 23(1)(c) Public Works Act 1981 (PWA) on 4 August 2021. The Notice sought: • The compul...

6. [2024] NZEnvC 101 Pascoe v Minister for Land Information [pdf, 371 KB]

   ...land found to be fair, sound and reasonably necessary for achieving the objectives of the Minister. No directions made. B: Costs reserved. 2 REASONS Introduction [1] Tony James Sofus Pascoe and Debbie Ann Pascoe (the Pascoes) have filed an objection to a notice of intention to take land (the Notice) served on them by the Minister for Land Information (the Minister) pursuant to s 23(1)(c) Public Works Act 1981 (PWA) on 4 August 2021. The Notice sought: • The compul...

7. Drozdzak v Accident Compensation Corporation (Work related gradual process) [2023] NZACC 157 [pdf, 442 KB]

   ...December 2018. He also viewed a range of clinical records and some go-pro camera footage that the appellant brought with him to the consultation. He also undertook a systematic review of the relevant epidemiological literature. [64] Following the filing of the appeal, he was asked to comment on the expert opinion of occupational physician, Dr McBride. [65] He was also provided the opinion of occupational physician and medical advisor for ACC, Dr John Monigatti. He concurs with...

8. [2010] NZEmpC 109 Rolling Thunder Motor Co Ltd v Kennedy [pdf, 34 KB]

   ...of the claim but the circumstances in which it arose. In particular, the issue is whether the claim is sufficiently connected to the employment relationship. [27] This matter should now proceed in the usual way. The defendant is directed to file and serve a statement of defence within 30 days after the date of this judgment. The Registrar should then arrange a directions conference with counsel. Costs [28] The plaintiff is entitled to costs on this application. I fix costs at...

9. [2012] NZEmpC 114 Salvation Army v Stewart & Johnstone [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...The defendants are entitled to a contribution to the costs they have incurred in resisting the plaintiff’s challenge. I expect the parties and counsel will use their best endeavours to agree costs but, if that is not possible, Mr Cranney should file and serve a memorandum within 30 working days after the date of this decision. Mr Clarke will then have a further 20 working days in which to respond. A A Couch Judge Signed at 3.30pm on 18 July 2012....

10. [2009] NZEmpC WC 9/09 Dickson v Unilever NZ Ltd [pdf, 31 KB]

    ...injury and damages would not be barred by the IPRC Act. That cause of action is therefore viable and may proceed to a hearing in the Employment Court. [41] Costs are reserved. In the absence of agreement between the parties the defendant is to file a memorandum as to costs by 1 May 2009. The plaintiff must respond by 8 May 2009. C M SHAW JUDGE Judgment signed at 4.30pm on 22 April 2009