Search Results

1. CAC 10014 v Charles [2011] NZREADT 13 [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...2010. On 3 March 2010 Judge Peter Spiller delivered a judgment dismissing the defendant’s claim for commission. [6] On 18 December 2010 the defendant was served with the charge and acknowledged receipt of it. [7] The defendant did not file a response to the charge pursuant to reg 7 of the Real Estate Agents (Complaints and Discipline) Regulations 2009 and the charge was set down for hearing by way of formal proof on 5 April 2011 and the defendant advised accordingly....

2. Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination – government report back on 15th-17th reports [pdf, 59 KB]

   ...customary rights hapū the right to give or refuse to give their consent to a number of conservation proposals and applications, for example the establishment of marine reserves. 15. Once ratified, appointed representatives of hapū of Ngāti Porou will file applications in the High Court for confirmation that the requirements for a finding by the High Court under section 96 of the Foreshore and Seabed Act have been satisfied. The Foreshore and Seabed Act requires these applications to...

3. CAC20002 v Gollins [2015] NZREADT 26 [pdf, 385 KB]

   ...evidence. It is not of course binding on the Tribunal that heard the full hearing. 6 [20] Ms Pender concluded by submitting that censure was the most appropriate penalty. Aggravating Features [21] The Complaints Assessment Committee filed a brief memorandum in reply which referred to a report in the media published by the Dominion Post (also online at stuff.co.nz) where Mr Gollins is reported to have said: “What I did was dumb, not dodgy. Two former Foodstuffs execut...

4. Environment Court annual report 2003 [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...within the registries. • Business Planning The Environment Court Unit’s Senior Management are working on developing robust and forward-thinking business processes for the Unit. Future developments include: • Decisions On-Line; • Electronic Filing and Searching; • Website Development for the Court. These initiatives, in conjunction with a more vigorous case management regime and more proficient rostering of Court resources, will allow for increasingly greater efficiencies to b...

5. ENVC paper Judicial perspective mobile devices in court 2013 [pdf, 40 KB]

   ...materials are needed, and/or they can be projected onto large screens in the courtroom if available. While the iPads are 3G and wi-fi enabled, they do not offer connectivity to Ministry systems and databases, so we are unable to access our personal files and folders for daily work purposes. The technology may be around the corner (in a year or 2) via future and more advanced MS- Windows-based tablets (Microsoft Surface). Those may offer the necessary 6 compatibility for ma...

6. Tipene - Motatau 2 Sec 35B7 (2015) 103 Taitokerau MB 205 (103 TTK 205) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...fence. (b) Section 37(3) and 131 determining both Motatau 2 Section 35B7A and Motatau 2 Section 35B7B to be Māori freehold land; 103 Taitokerau MB 212 (c) Section 73 the above orders are conditional upon Winiata Tipene’s surveyor filing a suitable draft survey plan showing the new titles by 19 August 2015. Pronounced in open Court in Whangarei at 10.49 am on Tuesday this 19 th day of May 2015. D J Ambler JUDGE

7. Carley (INZ) v Kim [2015] NZIACDT 107 (22 December 2015) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...[8] The Registrar and the complainant took no position in relation to specific sanctions. 1 This decision incorrectly refers to the adviser as Mr Kim, as her gender was not evident in the material filed. http://www.justice.govt.nz/ 3 Ms Kim’s response to the L complaint [9] Ms Kim said her former client was dishonest, and the issues were her client’s fault not her fault. [10] She accepted the unlicensed person, Mr L...

8. Koroi Piri Paki Whānau Trust – Punakitere 2A1B (2015) 112 Taitokerau MB 51 (112 TTK 51) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...Applicant Hearing: 17 April 2015 19 June 2015 (site visit) (Heard at Kaikohe) Judgment: 14 September 2015 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M P ARMSTRONG 112 Taitokerau 52 Introduction [1] An application has been filed by the trustees of the Koroi Piri Paki Whānau Trust seeking an occupation order over 4.937 hectares of the Punakitere 2A1B block per s 328 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 (“the Act”). [2] The issue in this case is whether t...

9. Morgan v CAC 20003 [2013] NZREADT 76 [pdf, 39 KB]

   ...family who include a permanently ill son. He emphasises that neither of the two consumers involved in the facts of this case complain about his conduct or service but have expressed their satisfaction to him. [19] The application for suppression filed on behalf of the licensee deals largely with matters which go to the merits of the appeal and the Committee’s decision to lay misconduct charges. [20] In terms of the specific grounds on which an order restricting publication is soug...

10. AAJ and AAK v ZZR [2012] NZDT 2 (28 September 2012) [pdf, 99 KB]

    ...Those arrangements were made because BO Ltd [the investment company] could no longer offer the higher interest required to fund the mortgage repayments, and KL offered to assist AAJ and AAK so they could make the payments. [30] AAJ and AAK filed their claim in the Disputes Tribunal on 18 April 2012, therefore their claim has been brought within three years of the date they ought reasonably to have discovered the deficiency in the scheme. Loss [31] AAJ and...