Search Results

1. LCRO 240-2015 OB v LC [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...available if the LCRO considers that the review can be adequately determined in the absence of the parties. [17] I record that having carefully read the complaint, the response to the complaint, the Committee’s decision and the submissions filed, there are no additional issues or questions in my mind that necessitate any further submission from either party. On the basis of the information available I have concluded that the review can be adequately determined in the absence of...

2. Alice Wouters v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 412) & Thomas Richadson [2017] NZREADT 60 [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...except as is set out in paragraph [28], above. [32] Pursuant to s 113 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008, which sets out appeal rights. Any appeal must be filed in the High Court within 20 working days of the date on which the Tribunal’s decision is served. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules. _____________________ Hon P J Andrews Chai...

3. Te Au v The Descendants of Aperahama Hutoitoi - Taukihepa (Tītī Islands) (2017) 46 Te Waipounamu MB 236 (46 TWP 236) [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...application, Judge Wainwright cautioned the Committee not to “give anybody something in the nature of an ongoing [right]” in Heretatua until the issues relating to the beneficial ownership of Heretatua had been determined.3 Mrs Wright was directed to file a s 45 application, which she subsequntly did. [11] A decision in relation to that application issued in 2007.4 It held that Aperahama Hutoitoi should have been included in a 1910 order which listed who was entitled to ‘Tauk...

4. Whaanga - Anewa Trust (2010) 11 Tairawhiti MB 46 (11 TRW 46) [pdf, 116 KB]

   ...Applicants’ case [7] Section 288 and partitions [9] Section 288(2)(a) [12] Section 288(2)(b) [17] Conclusion [28] 11 Tairawhiti MB 48 Introduction [1] This is an application for partition filed by Mere Joslyn Whaanga and Riwia Whaanga. They wish to partition a 300-acre part of the amalgamated block known as Anewa. The 300 acre area is the farm Mere‘s father once farmed prior to the amalgamation when it was Tutuotek...

5. [2010] NCZA 547 CA552/2009 A Worker v A Farmer [pdf, 31 KB]

   ...of the farmer had been on justifying his response. However, some time after the conclusion of the hearing, Judge Couch issued a minute raising the possibility of frustration.4 Supplementary submissions on this topic were invited. Both parties filed further submissions. Judgment was then delivered on the basis that the contract was frustrated. That was because the boy’s allegations had produced consequences for the farmer making continued employment of the worker radically dif...

6. IAA v van Zyl [2012] NZIACDT 59 (11 September 2012) [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...received draft papers prepared in the Philippines with the assistance of a person who was not a licensed immigration adviser. He reviewed the papers in New Zealand, stated he was the immigration adviser in the application, and the papers were then filed with Immigration New Zealand. [5] There are two components to the complaint which were upheld: [5.1] Mr van Zyl was the licensed immigration adviser, and he did not initiate the professional relationship. He allowed unlicensed people...

7. District Court Rules referencing DCA1947 [pdf, 297 KB]

   ...http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2016/0049/latest/DLM6942601.html 21.7(2) Enforcement of fine Section 114 of "the Act" Section 220 Schedule 1 2 Proceeding not started by notice of claim or where statement of claim or originating application filed under rule 2.7 of 2009 rules Section 46 of "the Act" Section 94 7 Proceeding transferred from High Court Section 46 of "the Act" Section 94 http://www.legislation.govt.nz/reg...

8. ENV-2016-AKL-000xxx New Zealand Steel Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...amongst other things, a submission to delete references to the AAAQS from the Proposed Plan in their entirety.3 1 Submission point 868-9. 2 Submission point 868-8. 100053497/5125981 2 9 NZ Steel filed evidence before the Hearings Panel seeking, as its preferred relief, that the AAAQS be deleted in their entirety. Decision appeal 10 The decision that NZ Steel is appealing is: 10.1 All areas where the Council rejected the Panel�...

9. ENV-2016-AKL-000TBA Woolmore Others v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...Sunnyvale Rd for over 20 years, was a submitter on the Proposed Unitary Plan and participated in the Independent Hearing Panel’s Hearings. 4. Alastair & Sonya Morris purchased 16 Red Hills Rd on 2 August 2013. During due diligence the property file revealed that the previous owners had undertaken a boundary change with their daughter’s property [in order to gift her one of the three lots provided for in the Structure Plan leaving a residual 2 lots for further development.] The...

10. [2015] NZSSAA 95 (4 December 2015) [pdf, 120 KB]

    ...deducting the Additional pension received by the appellant under s 70(2), even if he was able to demonstrate that receipt of this pension was due to his voluntary contributions. [26] Finally, we note there is brief reference in the submissions filed alleging that the Graduated Pension received by the appellant should also be excluded from the deduction regime in s 70. The appellant did not suggest his contributions to this scheme were voluntary. Indeed, contributions to this schem...