Search Results

1. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Burcher [2018] NZLCDT 42 [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...role, and have now recorded specific parameters for his role. Costs [22] The Standards Committee seeks an order that the practitioner “make a reasonable contribution to the Committee’s costs”. A schedule of these costs have now been filed and they total $46,072.60. [23] Counsel indicates that the total time spent on the matter was 234 hours, that the hearing lasted over two days and was relatively complex in its nature. Counsel for the Standards Committee also submitted...

2. [2019] NZEnvC 091 Jacks Point Residential No. 2 Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 135 KB]

   ...but abided by the court's decision. [3] By decision 1 dated 15 February 2019, the court made orders striking out parts of the appeal by JPG but refusing to strike out others. Clive and Sally Geddes ("Mr and Mrs Geddes") have now filed an application for costs dated 9 March 2019. [4] Mr Brabant is counsel for the JP Residents and a co-owner (together with Eleanor Brabant and Joan Williams) of one of the residential properties concerned but does not seek costs in respec...

3. MOJ Proactive release Regina v Tarrant Costs 23 February 2021 [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...with one count of murder. Duty lawyer appointed for purposes of this hearing. Defendant appeared in person for this hearing. Defence lawyers later instructed. April 2019 • 5 April: First appearance in Christchurch High Court. Additional charges filed for murder and attempted murder. Defendant appeared by Audio Visual Link (AVL). (The final charges pursued by the Crown were 51 charges of murder, 40 charges of attempted murder and one charge of committing a terrorist act, to which the...

4. King v Attorney-General (Application to Remove Proceedings to High Court) [2017] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...be granted in all eight proceedings. However, because the Tribunal cannot make an order under s 122A without leave of the High Court we intend in this decision to give our reasons for reaching the conclusion we have so that the plaintiffs can then file in the High Court an originating application to remove the proceedings to that Court. In the event of leave being given the Tribunal’s decision can then be perfected as an order at a later date. http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/...

5. McMaster v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 412) [2017] NZREADT 17 [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...competence in carrying out his work as agent. [31] Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed. [32] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Act, which sets out appeal rights. Any appeal must be filed in the High Court within 20 working days of the date on which the Tribunal’s decision is served. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules. ________________ Hon P J Andrews Chairpe...

6. Complaints Assessment Committee 302 v Crockett [2017] NZREADT 19 [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...20 working days of the date of this decision. [28] Pursuant to s 113 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008, which sets out appeal rights. Any appeal must be filed in the High Court within 20 working days of the date on which the Tribunal’s decision is served. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules. ___________________ Hon P J Andrews Cha...

7. Tihi v Nuku - Ruatoki B Sections 23, 25, 26B, 27, 31, 32, 33B2C2, 38, 79 [2019] Māori Appellate Court MB 531 (2019 APPEAL 531) [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...beneficial owners. Even if there were such an order, the best that the Executors could receive was an order at law determining ownership but no rights in equity. This point was conceded by Mr Pou at the hearing. [30] On consideration of the lower Court file it does not appear the trustees presented evidence of ownership. That the deceased owned the house was simply assumed. [31] Therefore, if there was no order under s 18(1)(a) in favour of the deceased, what rights do the executors...

8. Proactive release - Interest on Money Claims Regulations 2019 [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...AS ED B Y TH E AS SO CI AT E M IN IS TE R FO R CO UR TS Hon Aupito William Sio Associate Minister of Justice and for Courts Interest on Money Claims Regulations 2019 – Approve Cabinet Paper Date 4 February 2019 File reference Action sought Timeframe Approve the attached Cabinet paper and send it out for Ministerial consultation. 11 February 2019 Agree to submit it to Cabinet if relevant Ministers have approved the paper; and 28 Februa...

9. PSPLA - Form E: Company Officer form [pdf, 282 KB]

   ...fully completed form Completing this form • Print clearly in CAPITALS • Use a black pen or blue pen to complete this form • Answer every question on the form unless the instructions tell you otherwise Payment information There is no filing fee with this application. Application process In normal circumstances it will take 2 months to hear the outcome of the company application, once all company officers have sent in a company officer form supporting a company...

10. Hamilton Runs Ltd - EiC - EiC (filed 5 Feb 2021) [pdf, 3.3 MB]

    1 From Hamilton Runs Limited traceyweir@outlook.co.nz, reneegerard.weir@gmail.com Re: Proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago Submission of Lay Evidence: Introduction: 1. Hamilton Runs Limited was a submitter opposing Plan Change 7 2. Hamilton Runs Limited is a family run sheep and beef farm of 4,800 hectares. Three generations of the Weir family independently operate the farm, currently with room for employing further labour units. A large proportio