Search Results

1. Auckland Standards Committee 4 v Schlooz [2021] NZLCDT 12 ( 14 April 2021) [pdf, 400 KB]

   ...responding to an allegation that Mr Ys’ accounting firm, [firm name] had wrongly terminated a contract Ms Y had with that company, the practitioner said: You really are a moron. [redacted] won't be responding & I shall ignore you until you file proceedings. You of course can (& probably will) continue banging your head against a wall. GET A LIFE. Regards John Schlooz Barrister; (c) In an email on 10 June 2019 at 21:31 replying to an email Ms Y had sent to the pr...

2. LCRO 152/2016 BL v HJ (11 August 2017) [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...against him. However, the Committee concluded that the degree of seriousness of his conduct did not reach the threshold necessary under s 351(1) of the Act for disciplinary consequences to follow. Application for review [25] Mr and Mrs BL filed an application for review on 4 July 2016. The outcomes sought are that: (a) Mr HJ be required to apply for a court order under ss 333 to 337 of the Property Law Act 2007 for land covenants to be registered on the title to Lot 11 ret...

3. Rzoska - Estate of Hineawe [2012] Chief Judge's MB 107 (2012 CJ 107) [pdf, 391 KB]

   ...effected by or within the 2012 Chief Judge’s MB 123 months date of confirmation otherwise he will pay interest at the rate of 8% per annum calculated on a daily basis (i) Settlement with Māori Trustee within 2 months (ii) Purchaser filing with Registrar within same periods and undertaking in writing to apply to the Court, within 6 months for a recommendation to the Secretary that the cemetery area be set apart as a reservation (iii) Land remains Māori freehold la...

4. [2021] NZACC 23 - Muirhead v ACC (28 January 2021) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...its decision of 17 March 2011, whereby it declined to provide cover for the appellant’s claim for a work-related gradual onset condition. Background [2] On 23 February 2011, the appellant saw her general practitioner (GP), Dr Leitch, who filed an ACC injury claim form. The injury was described as “increasing upper back and neck pain while working as a sonographer over the past 6-12 months”. Under the heading “Diagnosis 1” was entered “trapezius left” and un...

5. [2021] NZSAAA 1 (11 February 2021) [pdf, 282 KB]

   ...generally require specific TEC/Universities NZ approval. (See generally Committee on University Academic Programmes (CUAP), Handbook 2019 (s 5.3 Terms used for enrolment in more than one qualification) at https://www.universitiesnz.ac.nz/sites/default/files/uni- nz/documents/CUAP Handbook 2019 final Sept.pdf) The number and range of programmes approved as conjoint by TEC/Universities NZ varies considerably between providers. Some offer a wide range, some only three or four and others pre...

6. Allan v Christchurch City Council [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...readings which identified possible water ingress problems. Property Check advised the claimants to lodge a claim with the Weathertight Homes Resolution Service and this was done on 24 July 2006. An assessment was carried out by Mr Glennie and he filed a report dated 30 October 2006. [3] Mr and Mrs Allan decided to undertake repairs prior to the determination of this claim. They entered into an agreement with Ruben Homes to undertake repairs for a sum of $114,984.00. Work co...

7. LCRO 10/2018 DO v ABC & Body Corporate (30 August 2019) [pdf, 274 KB]

   ...itself as no distinction could be drawn between that and its members; because (i) his communication had been within the confines of the formal processes of the body corporate as set down by statute. Application for review and response [47] Mr DO filed an application for review on 17 January 2018. The outcome sought is the setting aside of the findings of rule breach and unsatisfactory conduct. [48] He submits that: (a) he did not communicate directly with the body corporate but...

8. LCRO 207/2018 PC v FM (10 September 2019) [pdf, 499 KB]

   ...successful in Court where there has been a finding of a breach of fiduciary duty on the part of the defendants. The Court found that the defendant’s omission was the cause of Ms PC’s loss. 7 Application for review [34] Through Mr ZL, Ms PC filed an application for review on 9 November 2018 The outcome sought is some limitation on Mr FM’s field of legal work, re-education in fiduciary duty, or a fine. [35] Mr ZL’s submissions are not always particularly easy to follow bu...

9. Kingsnorth v Crawford - Motuaruhe 5D (2018) 199 Waiariki MB 203 (199 WAR 203) [pdf, 368 KB]

   ...Trust, and her son Pararaki Waititi from entering the house and curtilage area, until further order of the Court. 199 Waiariki MB 205 Ngā Kaupapa - The issues [5] Both parties were represented by counsel. Prior to the hearing, counsel filed a joint memorandum containing an agreed statement of facts and setting out their view of the remaining issues for the Court to determine. [6] The joint memorandum provides as follows: 3. The parties agree that: a. the house is a...

10. [2020] NZSSAA 4 (28 April 2020) [pdf, 224 KB]

    ...ordinarily resident in New Zealand. [16] The Ministry contended that the Authority had no jurisdiction to determine XXXX’s entitlement for the period between 7 October 2015 and 7 January 2018 because he did not raise this issue until he filed submissions on his appeal. That is not correct: (a) XXXX’s application for review put in issue both his entitlement from 5 December 2012 and the cessation commencing 7 October 2015; (b) The Benefits Review Committee’s decision rec...