Search Results

1. Pukeroa Oruawhata Trust - Pukeroa Oruawhata Trust (2005) 293 Rotorua MB 74 (293 ROT 74) [pdf, 503 KB]

   ...applied for a variation. Similarly, I can find no impediment preventing this Court from varying a trust order as it sees fit, provided notice has been given to those affected by any proposed changes and that they have been given the opportunity to file with the Court any submissions they may care to make. In this instance, ample opportunity has been provided to the parties to canvass the views of the trustees and ~.,. Minute Book: 293 ROT 77 the beneficial owners in their variou...

2. Ross - Omaio 55 (2001) 77 Ōpōtiki MB 24 (77 OPO 24) [pdf, 451 KB]

   ...Ross Whanau, the historical and cultural links they have to it, whakapapa, their contribution as at these dates to the development of the land and evidence as to their plans for future utilisation. In this last respect, quite extensive material was filed by way of a report authored by Mr Robert Ross setting out the future plans of the whanau for the block. These included papakainga developments, fencing of boundaries, road maintenance on the block, harakeke, kiekie, pingao, tree and orcha...

3. Zhong Wei Zhou v Complaints Assessment Committee 412 & Shu (Sue) Zhou [2017] NZREADT 49 [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...reviewing the agreements for sale and purchase and arranging cancellation of the agreements. [40] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Act, which sets out appeal rights. Any appeal must be filed in the High Court within 20 working days of the date on which the Tribunal’s decision is served. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules. ____________________ Hon P J Andrews Chai...

4. [2019] NZEnvC 036 Yaldhurst Joint Action Group v Christchurch City Council [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...(b) Christchurch City Council is to pay the sum of $20,000.00 to the Yaldhurst Quarries Joint Action Group. B: Under section 286 of the Resource Management Act 1991 , the District Court at Christchurch is named as the Court this order may be filed in for enforcement purposes (if necessary). YALDHURST QUARRIES JOINT ACTION GROUP v CCC - COSTS 2 REASONS Introduction [1] Yaldhurst Quarries Joint Action Group successfully appealed a decision granting resource consent to Hare...

5. Canterbury / Westland Standards Committee 3 v Johnson [2018] NZLCDT 21 [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...we have referred. Name Suppression [35] The practitioner seeks suppression of his name and identifying particulars, pursuant to s 240. He acknowledges that “… The Act contains a presumption of open justice”. [36] There is no evidence filed in support of this application. Mr Napier simply makes the submission on behalf of the practitioner that because the matter is currently under appeal, “… if the appeal is successful then what has been found against Mr Johnson may c...

6. GZ v Ke (Luke) Lu [2019] NZIACDT 26 (6 May 2019) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...who returned the draft, having made some changes to it. It was finalised, then signed by the complainant and sent by her to Immigration New Zealand. [14] Immigration New Zealand declined the visa applications. Complaint [15] The complainant filed a complaint against Mr Lu in December 2015 with the Immigration Advisers Authority (the Authority), headed by the Registrar of Immigration Advisers (the Registrar). The complainant was upset that her application had been declined by I...

7. [2019] NZLVT 003 Walker v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   ...(a) the sum of $6,900 to the Kenepuru and Central Sounds Residents Association, and Friends of Nelson Haven and Tasman Bay jointly; and (b) the sum of $31 ,250 to the Marlborough District Council. B: Under s 286 of the Act, the Orders in A may be filed in the District Court at Blenheim for the purposes of enforcement. R J DAVIDSON FAMILY TRUST V MDC - COSTS DECISION 2 REASONS Introduction [1 J This proceeding concerns an appeal by the R J Davidson Family Trust ("the T...

8. McAuley v The Real Estate Agents Authority CAC (416) NZREADT 22 [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...dismissed and there will be an order accordingly. [29] Pursuant to s 113 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008, which sets out appeal rights. Any appeal must be filed in the High Court within 20 working days of the date on which the Tribunal’s decision is served. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules. __________________ J Doogue Deputy Ch...

9. CAC 403 v Optimize Realty Limited [2019] NZREADT 23 (6 June 2019) [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...is to pay to the Authority a fine of $7,500. [35] Pursuant to s 113 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008, which sets out appeal rights. Any appeal must be filed in the High Court within 20 working days of the date on which the Tribunal’s decision is served. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules. __________________ Mr J Doogue Deputy Chairpers...

10. 2021-02-22 Special Advisor (Ian Gordon) - submission on Willowridge s 281 application [pdf, 150 KB]

    ...Plan. It was commenced by way of notice of motion under s 149T(2) of the RMA, following a direction by the Minister for the Environment under s 142(2)(b) that the matter be referred to the Court. 4. Willowridge Development Ltd (Willowridge) has filed a s 274 Notice dated 17 December 2020 (Notice). The Notice was out of time by some three weeks and was accompanied by a request for waiver of time under s 281 of the RMA. 5. In its Notice and subsequent memoranda, Willowridge state...