Search Results

1. LCRO 13/2015 UP v HQ (19 June 2018) [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...Mr Vaughan had advised them at the commencement of the hearing that he did not want them to read out a statement they had prepared. [21] Prior to the hearing Mr Vaughan had thoroughly acquainted himself with all material on the Committee’s file and provided to this Office on review. It was not necessary to traverse this material at the review hearing and there were particular matters which Mr Vaughan required the parties to address initially. [22] Mr Vaughan’s advice to Mr...

2. Te Manutukutuku Issue 22 [pdf, 2.7 MB]

   ...kilometres east of Kaikohe, the field covers between 25 and 50 square kilo­ metres of land most of which is now in Crown or private ownership. The claimants own one acre in the five acre block on which the Ngawha springs are situated. The claim was filed in response to a joint venture application under the Resource Management Act 1991 by the Bay of Islands Electric Power Board and the Taitokerau Maori Trust Board to use the Ngawha geothermal resource for electricity generation. The...

3. Carrus Corporation Limited & Others Submissions - 6 December 2017 [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...basis for changes to the permitted activity rules and Rules SO 10, SO 12 and SO 14. 13. Changes to the permitted activity rules and rules SO 10, SO 12, and SO 14 were not signalled in the notice of appeal and it was not until reply evidence was filed that the relief sought was expressed. 14. I submit that this is too late to introduce the relief, and that the appropriate mechanism is through a plan change - which will enable KJJ-873709-11-3 260-2 ( ( 15. 16. 6 potent...

4. [2022] NZEmpC 30 Cousens v Star Nelson Holdings Ltd [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...company’s property. He sought the ability to preserve that part of the relief claimed in the statement of claim, as a potential available remedy if the breach continues. I agree that reservation of the ability to make a further application, without filing further proceedings, is appropriate. [35] Leave is reserved to Mr Cousens to seek further or other sanctions under s 140(6) if the Authority’s compliance order is not complied with by Star Nelson on or before 24 March 2022....

5. Hiroti - Succession to Rira Peti Hiroti (2021) 72 Te Waipounamu MB 271 (72 TWP 271) [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...record shows an adoption order made by the Māori Land Court for the adoption of Peihana by Rira on 15 October 1958 at 1 ADWK 139 – 140. Ko te hātepe ture o te tono nei Procedural history [17] A list of potential owners of the SILNA land was filed in the Court nearly 20 years ago. Updating the list of owners by identifying successors to deceased owners is now a priority for the Māori Land Court. On 5 October 2017, the Court approved an updated interim list of beneficiaries...

6. Broderick v Accident Compensation Corporation (Employment) [2022] NZACC 159 [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...achieved is the absolute antithesis of s 6 with the Court being told, in addition, that the appellant currently receives less weekly compensation from ACC than she would if she was receiving an unemployment benefit. [41] In written submissions filed and served prior to the hearing, Ms Broderick said: As advised by MSD, a beneficiary would receive $441 (net) in my situation and I receive $416 (net) via compensation. [42] The respondent has not challenged this statement. I acce...

7. 2. JWS 2 - JWS of Regulatory Planning Experts dated 10 March 2022 [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...evidence: a. Ms Kerstin Strauss, evidence-in-chief dated 11 February 2022; b. Ms Melanie Heather, evidence-in-chief dated 11 February 2022; and c. Mr Quinn McIntyre, evidence-in-chief dated 25 February 2022. 4. Evidence in reply is due to be filed on 11 March 2022. 5. The experts’ qualifications, experience, assumptions, methods, facts, material and papers relied on are set out in their respective briefs of evidence. KS, MH and QM acknowledge they each have different expertise. KS...

8. [2022] NZACC 29 – McIver v ACC (8 March 2022) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...being a meniscal tear of her left knee. The appeal is therefore allowed, and the review decision is set aside. 8 [30] Ms McIver is entitled to costs. If these cannot be agreed within one month, I shall determine the issue following the filing of memoranda. P R Spiller District Court Judge Solicitors: Young Hunter for the first respondent. Solutions Law Office, Nelson, for the second respondent.

9. [2023] NZEnvC 123 MFC Development Limited Partnership [pdf, 341 KB]

   ...substantive hearing but that the concerns raised with respect to notification warranted preliminary determination. [3] Submissions and evidence were received from Council on 10 May and 29 May 2023. CCAS lodged submissions on 23 May 2023, ·with a reply filed on 2June 2023. Another s 27 4 party (Prime Property Group Ltd) provided short submissions supporting the position of CCAS. Similarly, short submissions were received from the applicant supporting the position put fm-ward by th...

10. OIA-102463.pdf [pdf, 248 KB]

    ...The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) is mandated to investigate and prosecute serious or complex fraud, including bribery and corruption crimes that could undermine confidence in the public sector or are of significant public interest. Charges that may be filed include charges under the Secret Commissions Act 1910, and the Crimes Act 1961 (Part 6, sections 99 to 106 – crimes affecting the administration of law and justice). The SFO has provided the following as examples of recent prosecutions...