Search Results

1. Complaints Assessment Committee 403 v Elia [2017] NZREADT 7 [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...20 working days of the date of this decision. [29] Pursuant to s 113 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008, which sets out appeal rights. Any appeal must be filed in the High Court within 20 working days of the date on which the Tribunal’s decision is served. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules. ______________________ Hon P J Andrews Chairperso...

2. Griffiths v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 412) & Burnett [2017] NZREADT 26 [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...invite submissions on what educational courses or other practical steps can be taken to address these concerns and such other orders as the CAC or Mr Burnett wish to submit:  The CAC and Mr Griffiths are to have their submission as to penalty filed within 21 days.  Mr Burnett has 21 days to reply.  Mr Griffiths and the CAC have a five further days to make any further submissions strictly in reply. [27] The Tribunals draws the parties attention to the appeal provisions...

3. INZ (Calder) v Ji [2019] NZIACDT 68 (1 October 2019) Sanctions [pdf, 119 KB]

   IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2019] NZIACDT 68 Reference No: IACDT 033/17 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY THE REGISTRAR OF IMMIGRATION ADVISERS Registrar BETWEEN IMMIGRATION NEW ZEALAND (DARREN CALDER) Complainant AND YAN (RYAN) JI Adviser DECISION

4. LCRO 046/2018 HD v BK (18 February 2019) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...relation to both agreements; (c) Mr BK did not act for Mr HD in relation to those documents; and (d) the Committee is unable to discern any conflict of interest in Mr BK acting initially for Mr HD and Ms M. Application for review [26] Mr HD filed an application for review on 28 March 2018. He submits: (a) the Committee’s decision contains critical errors and omissions which he lists in some detail; (b) Mr BK failed to disclose the changes he made to the 2013 agreement on...

5. [2019] NZEnvC169 Kapiti Coast District Council [pdf, 3.3 MB]

   ...Council (the Council) has made application to the Court for rules in its Proposed District Plan (PDP) to have legal effect from the date of notification of those rules pursuant to s 86D Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA). [2] The application was filed on 9 September 2019 and incorporated a detailed memorandum of counsel setting out the grounds for the application together with an 2 [3] The application relates to Variation 4H (the Variation) to the PDP. The Variation is one of a...

6. Glenshee Station Limited - EiC - M E Hore (4 Feb 2021) [pdf, 4.4 MB]

   ...be used to top up the dam. 15 PP-1035600-2-248-V2 Glenshee Station Contour Irrigation Contour and K line irrigation are complementary to each other. When the flow is good: the Kline dam is filing and being used, the Dredge paddocks can be contour irrigated. The races are set to catch the flow as it starts at the top race on the hill and works its way down the terrace. When the flow decreases through the dry season the more ef...

7. [2020] NZEmpC 131 Surplus Brokers Ltd v Armstrong [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...Authority in the defendant’s favour. Conclusion [22] The challenge is dismissed. The defendant is entitled to a contribution to his costs on the challenge. If these cannot otherwise be agreed, I will receive memoranda, with the defendant filing and serving any application together with any supporting material within 15 working days; the plaintiff within a further 10 working days; and anything strictly in reply with a further five working days. Christin...

8. HES v Parekh [2019] NZIACDT 47 sanctions (19 July 2019) [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...thought fair and reasonable. However, the amount claimed by the complainant appeared to be excessive, but she would let the Tribunal decide what sum was payable. [24] In over 13 years of practice, Ms Parekh said she had “built over 7,000 client files”. She acted in the best interests of her clients and would continue to make significant changes to her practice in accordance with Immigration New Zealand’s policies and the Authority’s requirements. JURISDICTION [25]...

9. [2020] NZEmpC 9 Zhang v Telco Asset Management Ltd [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...settlement matters; that Calderbank offers were made which should be taken into account; and that Telco succeeded in most of the case. For all these reasons, Telco’s position is that costs and disbursements should lie where they fall. [4] Mr Zhang filed a submission in reply. Some parts of that submission contain references to factual matters which have already been the subject of findings by the Court, and which cannot be considered further. Mr Zhang also explained why he did...

10. [2020] NZREADT 08 - Bond (25 February 2020) [pdf, 154 KB]

    ...Tribunal were not satisfied that she was guilty of disgraceful conduct, it could find Ms Bond guilty of misconduct under s 73(b) of the 2008 Act (seriously incompetent or seriously negligent real estate agency work). [2] In a joint memorandum filed in the Tribunal on 21 November 2019, Ms Bond pleaded guilty to disgraceful conduct or seriously negligent conduct in the alternative. [3] The Tribunal is required to determine whether Ms Bond is guilty of misconduct under s 73(a) or s 7...