Search Results

1. Complaints Assessment Committee 403 v Shalendra Goundar [2017] NZREADT 52 [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...Act. 14 Wang v Real Estate Agents Authority [2015] NZHC 1011, at [60]. [2017] NZREADT 52 - Goundar [102] The Case Manager is to arrange a telephone conference in order to set a timetable for filing submissions as to penalty. Counsel are directed to advise the Tribunal if a hearing is required. [103] Pursuant to s 113 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Real Estate Ag...

2. DairyNZ Limited [pdf, 427 KB]

   ...requirement to attach the following documents to any notice of appeal is waived: submissions and/or further submissions, the Decision, and the names and addresses of persons to be served with a copy of the appeal. b. That any notice of appeal may be filed electronically to WRC.PC1appeals@justice.govt.nz and must be filed on the Council by email to PC1Appeals@waikatoregion.govt.nz. c. That service of the notice of appeal will be effected by the Court uploading any appeals to it...

3. [2021] NZEnvC 043 Turner v Thames-Coromandel District Council [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...earthworks, started in January 2019. Construction of the house commenced in 2020 and continued through that year. 7 [21] On 13 July 2020, Mr Turner's barrister wrote to Mrs Barrett giving notice of this proceeding. This application was filed and served on 31 July 2020. Mr Turner's Submissions [22] Counsel for Mr Turner submits that the focus of the Court's assessment must be on the extent of work done by 28 January 2019, any subsequent work being irrelevant....

4. [2019] NZEmpC 20 Jacks Hardware and Timber Ltd v First Union Inc [pdf, 537 KB]

   JACKS HARDWARE AND TIMBER LIMITED v FIRST UNION INCORPORATED [2019] NZEmpC 20 [28 February 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2019] NZEmpC 20 EMPC 174/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN JACKS HARDWARE AND TIMBER LIMITED Plaintiff AND FIRST UNION INCORPORATED Defendant Hearing: 15 and 1

5. [2018] NZSAAA 2 (31 July 2018) [pdf, 422 KB]

   ...address them. In particular, it was recognised that class concerns about the timetable and course content, and about the absence of specialist and film industry input, needed to be dealt with. Although it is not altogether clear from the appeal file, it appears that this response largely defused the situation. Certainly most, if not all, of the other students continued with the programme. Of the 11 or so students enrolled, the Provider says that so far as it was aware the appellant was...

6. [2019] NZEnvC 014 Arthurs Point Land Trust v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 7.3 MB]

   ...granted in relation to the Morningstar Reserve. An application by GSL to join the UCESI appeal as a section 274 party is opposed by APONLSI and I will consider that later. [11] 5 6 For its part APONLSI sought a waiver of the time limit to file a section 274 notice Affidavit of M B Sempte 13 December 2018 Exhibit MBS-2. Rules of APONLSI - Exhibit MBS-1 attached to Mr Semple's affidavit, above n 5. 6 in relation to NTTL's appeal (ENV-2018-CHC-136). While NTTL initi...

7. Family Court Rewrite Submission - Te Putahitanga [pdf, 552 KB]

   ...services and programmes. • A Whānau Ora plan because we see the child in the context of whānau. The plan should contain the protective factors of whānau, culture, and identity to impact and absorb the effects of trauma. • Co-construct case files so whānau can control the narration of their journey. It is not just about someone else reporting on the child or the whānau. • How the tamariki is coping physically, emotionally and spiritually • If a child has been removed...

8. Martin v CAC 407 and Ors [2016] NZREADT 67 [pdf, 296 KB]

   ...whether [the licensee] or the Agency failed to apply the very best practice which could possibly have been applied in the circumstances.” Appeal hearing [15] The appeal was heard over two days, as a de novo hearing. Briefs of evidence were filed in advance, and the Tribunal heard oral evidence from the appellant, the licensee, members of the Agency, and other evidence called by the appellant and the second and third respondents. Witnesses were available for cross-examination and...

9. OX v XX Standards Committee LCRO 180/2015 (4 October 2016) [pdf, 456 KB]

   ...expectation that the trial would be completed expeditiously, suggesting it was cut short to suit the Judge’s convenience, rather than because of any shortcoming on Mr OX’s part. He explained the volume and complexity of the materials on the trial file, and difficulties he had had in his client’s instructions before trial commenced. [17] Mr OX says he carefully prepared cross examination for each of the Crown witnesses, which in some cases was lengthy. Mr OX addressed each of...

10. M and M v IAG New Zealand Ltd [2019] CEIT-2019-0047 [pdf, 329 KB]

    ...area of dispute addressed by the Tribunal to avoid further argument and delay. [98] I do not consider that this issue has been properly argued and I am, therefore, calling for further submissions. (a) Mr Johnson's submissions are to be filed by 31 January 2020; (b) Mr Thane's response is to be filed by14 February 2020; and (c) Mr Johnson is to reply to Mr Thane's submissions by 21 February 2020. Overall cost [99] The matters already traversed by the Tribunal c...